3054 rubric 2

docx

School

Hostos Community College, CUNY *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

3054

Subject

Civil Engineering

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by EarlMaskNarwhal31

Report
EDUC_3054_Week_1_Assignment_Rubric EDUC_3054_Week_1_Assignment_Rubric Criteria Ratings This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiteracy Assessments- Summarize the literacy instruction and assessment utilized within the classroom. 6.25 to >5.62 pts Advanced Analyze the literacy instruction and assessment utilized within the classroom. An extended explanation is included of why these techniques are used and how they impact student learning. 5.62 to >4.99 pts Proficient Summarize the literacy instruction and assessment utilized within the classroom. 4.99 to >4.37 pts Emerging Identifies components of literacy instruction and assessment used within the classroom, but fails to describe a complete picture of the assessment used to drive instruction. 4.37 to >0 pts Novice Discusses activities that take place in th classroom, but includes an inaccurate picture o the literacy instruction and assessment within the classroom. This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStudent Interests- Discusses how the host teacher determines student interests, dispositions, and attitudes about reading and literacy to create a literate and motivating environment. 5 to >4.5 pts Advanced Analyzes ways to determine student interests, dispositions, and attitudes about reading to create a motivating environment. A supporting rationale and examples are included to demonstrate how this information impacts student learning. 4.5 to >4.0 pts Proficient Discusses how the host teacher determines student interests, dispositions, and attitudes about reading and literacy to create a literate and motivating environment. 4 to >3.5 pts Emerging Provides examples of the student interests and attitudes toward reading and literacy, but provides little evidence as to how the host teacher obtains this information. 3.5 to >0 pts Novice Discusses student interests and attitudes in general, but fail to connect this discussion to their field experience classroom.
EDUC_3054_Week_1_Assignment_Rubric Criteria Ratings This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccommodati ons-Explains which accommodations are made for second language learners and how instruction and assessment are adjusted based on narrative and expository texts. 5 to >4.5 pts Advanced Analyzes accommodations made for second language learners and instructional adjustments based on narrative and expository texts. An explanation is included surrounding why these accommodations and adjustments impact student learning. 4.5 to >4.0 pts Proficient Explains which accommodations are made for second language learners and how instruction and assessment are adjusted based on narrative and expository texts. 4 to >3.5 pts Emerging Describes general accommodations and adjustments to instruction, but fails to connect these to specific situations or second language learners. 3.5 to >0 pts Novice Identifies ineffective or irrelevant accommodations and adjustments t instruction. This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedia Literacy- Explains how media literacy is incorporated into instruction/assessmen t. 5 to >4.5 pts Advanced Analyzes the use of media literacy and how its use can increase student learning. 4.5 to >4.0 pts Proficient Explains how media literacy is incorporated into instruction/assessment. 4 to >3.5 pts Emerging Discusses media literacy, but provides limited details on the application within the classroom. 3.5 to >0 pts Novice Identifies inaccurate examples of media literacy
EDUC_3054_Week_1_Assignment_Rubric Criteria Ratings This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting: The writing of the assignment reflect Walden’s expectations. 3.75 to >3.37 pts Advanced Writing meets Walden’s standards for scholarly writing and is exceptionally well organized. Virtually no errors in grammar, mechanics or APA are present in the assignment. 3.37 to >3.0 pts Proficient Writing is generally clear, well organized, and meets Walden’s standards for scholarly writing. Writing contains few grammar, mechanics, or APA errors. 3 to >2.62 pts Emerging Writing lacks clarity and/or organization. Significant errors in grammar, mechanics, or APA are present. 2.62 to >0 pts Novice Writing lacks both clarity and organization. Error in grammar, mechanics, or APA make the assignment difficul to read. Total Points: 25
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help