John Butler Antacid Lab

docx

School

Saint Joseph's University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

120

Subject

Chemistry

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by CountBoulder12888

Report
John Butler Antacid Lab DATA TABLE I: Back Titration of HCl (aq) NOT Neutralized by Antacid Tablet Molarity of HCl: 1.00 Molarity of NaOH: 1.00 Antacid assigned to your group: Gaviscon Cost per tablet: 11 c Active agent in antacid: Aluminum hydroxide and magnesium carbonate Trial # Mass of Antacid Volume of HCl added to antacid Initial Buret Reading Final Buret Reading Volume of NaOH used 1 1.607g 25 mL 38 mL 16.5 mL 21.50 mL 2 1.60 25 mL 20 mL 12mL 18.00 mL 3 1.61 25 mL 30.5 9.5 mL 21.00 mL Average volume of NaOH (aq) used 20.20 mL
DATA TABLE II: Comparison of Commercial Antacids Antacid 1: AlkaSeltzer Antacid 2: Tums Antacid 3: Gaviscon Antacid 1 Antacid 2 Antacid 3 Average volume of NaOH (aq) used ( from Data Table I ) 19.28 mL 7.29 mL 20.20 mL Mols of. NaOH (aq) .01298 .00729 .02020 Mols of HCl (aq) not neutralized by antacid .01928 .00729 .02020 Mols of HCl (aq) neutralized by antacid .00572 .01771 .00480 Volume of stomach acid that would be neutralized by antacid (mL) 36.9 mL 11.43 mL 31.0 mL Cost of Antacid tablet (¢) 17 c 10 c 11 c Cost per mL of stomach acid .46 c .87 c .35 c Calculations: L x Molarity =moles M x V - M1 x V1= moles neutralized by antacid .025 moles - .02020 moles = .00480 moles neutralized by antacid (.00480 moles of HCl)/(.155M)= 31.0 mL 1. .0202 moles of NaOH 2. .0202 moles of HCl 3. .00480 moles of HCl were neutralized by antacid 4. 31.0 mL of stomach acid would be neutralized 5. .35 c/L Conclusion: 6. According to my data I would want to buy Gaviscon because it is only .35 c per mL of
stomach acid that is neutralized. Knowing the chart displayed in class it was apparent that the best option was Alka Seltzer which neutralized stomach acid for the cheapest. An observation I made during the lab was that the Alka seltzer appeared to dissolve the quickest into the HCl solution which could be why it is the most cost effective. I believe the reason for the inaccuracy in our data has to do with an observational bias. I believed that the titration color for the Gaviscon solution was the same as the displayed example using a smaller amount of NaOH on average.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help