Enthalpy of Combustion

docx

School

Florida International University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

3410L

Subject

Chemistry

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

11

Uploaded by ColonelValorHeron45

Report
Enthalpy of Combustion Amatullah Shahid 11/27/2022
Introduction The standard enthalpy of formation is equal to the energy needed to break bonds between reactants minus the energy released by new bonds formed in the product. Heat, which uses the symbol q, is absorbed or used up one mole of the compound when temperature and pressure are under standard conditions (i.e 25* C (298 K) and p = 1 bar. An exothermic reaction is when heat is released from the course of the reaction. This denotes the reaction is favorable and spontaneous. When heat is absorbed resulting in a positive number for enthalpy, then it is not favorable and non-spontaneous. A bomb calorimeter is a device used to measure the value of the heat of reaction at constant pressure.
Abstract In this experiment, one is going to use a bomb calorimeter to obtain the measurement for the enthalpy of combustion. From the experimental data obtained from the results of using the bomb calorimeter, the enthalpy of formation will be found. The compound was combustion in three trials to find the heat capacity. This was done by recording the temperature every 30 seconds. There is a distinct fluctuation between the three trials. This can be the result of errors done by multiple methods. According to the results, the heat capacity is far from the recorded experimental data of Naphthalene.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Procedure 1. Two compounds will be used to do combustion measurements: benzoic acid and a compound that will be assigned. For each compound, three measurements should be obtained. 2. To find the heat of capacity of the calorimeter, benzoic acid will be used to find C B because it can be found in high purity, burns easily, and has a known value for the internal energy of combustion. 3. For The Calorimeter measurement a. First obtained a pellet shape of the compound to be burned. The pellet should be around 1 gram. Make sure to measure the exact mass of the pellet on an analytical balance. b. Cut a piece of the fuse wire to about 3 inches in length and then weight it on the analytical balance. 4. Assembly of the Bomb Calorimeter a. The fuse wire must be threaded between electrodes of the reaction vessel. Then place the pellet in a way that it is in contact with the fuse wire. b. To the reaction vessel, make sure to add one milliliter of water to the reaction vessel because the gas inside the bomb is already saturated with water vapor. This is so any more water produced is water liquid. c. Put together the reaction vessel d. Use 10 to 15 atmospheres of oxygen to fill the reaction vessel. e. Place the reaction vessel in the metal bucket. Fill the reaction bucket with 2.00 L of water using volumetric glassware. f. Place the bucket inside the insulated jacket. g. Make the electrical connection between the bucket and reaction vessel. h. Put the lid on the insulated jacket and stir the water in the reaction vessel
Errors Sources 1. Not weighing out enough sample might make it combust quicker than one would expect. 2. Not adding enough water or oxygen could make some errors. 3. Not threading the fuse wire through the electrodes correctly where there is a defined kink so the heat transfers to the compound and doesn't just burn the wire.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Results Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample3 naphthalene 1.002g 1.006g 1.010g Pressure 758.4 Temperature 20.0 Naph pellet 0.996g 0.995g 0.973g Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Tim e Temperatur e Tim e Temperatur e Tim e Temperatur e 0 21.07 0 21.04 0 21.22 30 21.05 30 21.11 30 21.38 60 21.06 60 21.09 60 21.35 90 21.06 90 21.11 90 21.34 120 21.07 120 21.1 120 21.37 150 21.06 150 21.1 150 21.4 180 21.06 180 21.1 180 21.38 210 21.05 Combustio n 210 21.13 210 21.37 240 21.09 240 21.1 240 21.36 270 21.51 270 21.1 270 21.37 300 22.77 300 21.08 300 21.37
330 23.64 330 21.1 330 21.37 360 24.24 360 21.12 360 21.36 390 24.5 390 21.1 390 21.38 420 24.64 420 21.1 420 21.38 450 24.77 450 21.1 450 21.37 480 24.85 480 21.1 Combustio n 480 21.36 Combustio n 510 24.92 510 21.16 510 21.38 540 24.93 540 22.45 540 21.84 570 24.96 570 23.69 570 23.2 600 24.96 600 24.3 600 24.02 630 24.97 630 24.64 630 24.51 660 24.95 660 24.84 660 24.8 690 24.98 690 24.93 690 24.96 720 24.96 720 25.01 720 25.05 750 24.99 750 25.11 780 25.01 780 25.14 810 25.01 810 25.16 840 25.01 840 25.18 870 25.01 870 25.16 900 25.17 930 25.16 960 25.18 990 25.17 102 0 25.16 105 0 25.16 108 0 25.15
Reaction:   C 10 H 8 +8 O 2 → 10 CO 2 + 4 H 2 O + energy   Tria ls C J/C Delta c U q J n R j/Km ol delt a T Delta T in K Delta H mx g of compoun d mw g Delt a cU (W) Delta cU (X) 1 43.7 3 - 170.64 3 - 170.98 4 1 8.314 3.89 276.8 9 2131.42 1.002 0.008 - 585 0 - 123.93642 71 2 62.7 6 - 243.92 8 - 245.39 2 1 8.314 3.91 276.9 1 2058.30 2 1.006 0.000 3 - 585 0 - 242.18349 9 3 81.5 6 - 306.05 2 - 309.11 2 1 8.314 3.79 276.7 9 1995.18 1.01 0.01 - 585 0 - 248.13108 91 C average Delta U Average C variance Delta U Variance C Average deviation Delta U Average Deviation C estimate standard deviatio n Delta U estimate d Standard Deviation 62.6833 3 - 240.207642 3 357.781633 3 4594.27130 4 12.6355555 6 46.376418 9 34.9402 5 67.78105
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Discussion The results seems to show there is a range of numbers. The error seems to lie in the amount of readings for the trial. Since some trials had more readings than the last, perhaps there was an error in how many readings were done much the experiment was affected. The size of the sample could have affected the heat capacity of the overall combustion. How warm the water is before combustion.
Conclusion A major source of error in this experiment is not properly kinking the wire when it is attached to the compound. One doesn't want the heat to not be evenly distributed. The experiment did not display a temperature which corresponded to the recorded heat capacity naphthalene.