AAMANI_SHARMA_L05

docx

School

Pennsylvania State University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

100A

Subject

Chemistry

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by CoachOxideNewt22

CAS 100A Reflection on Personal Topics Part 1: The Five Canons (8 points) Question 1.1: As discussed in Lessons 04 and 05 and the Planned Spontaneity Keywords entry, this class will emphasize and require extemporaneous speaking for your major speeches. You also had some practice with extemporaneous speaking in your Professional Speech. Define extemporaneous speaking in your own words and distinguish it from the other memory strategies. Be clear and specific. (2 points) Extemporaneous speaking is a way of speaking that masks your preparedness of the topic, it places thoughtful pauses and filler words strategically to give off the image that it has not been practice. Even though, it is crafted to give an organic image Two extemporaneous speeches will never be the same because they are never delivered in sequence, making it the same. They do have the same framework of points which is where the preparedness and research comes from. Other memory strategies like memorized or impromptu speaking are two opposite sides of the coin, either every word is recited from memory or delivered without any preparation. Extemporaneous speaking is the best of both worlds, requiring preparation but also spontaneity and adaptability during the delivery. Of the 4 major types, memorized, impromptu, extemporaneous and manuscript, the most impersonal one is manuscript because that gives you the room to fully write out the speech and have it read from a note-card in front of you, whereas extemporaneous speaking balances out planning and being natural. Albeit, in scenarios such as giving eulogies, manuscription is recommended for depth of thoughts and mind-to-heart connection. Question 1.2: Based on our discussion of the five canons, your Professional Speech, and/or your history of public speaking, which of the five canons do you think is/are your strongest and why? (2 points) I would say that for me personally, cannon 3, Style is my strongest because in my history of speaking I’ve always gotten compliments about how unique my way of delivery is. I always make sure that I am not using jargon and heavy terms just to sound knowledgeable, but the truth is, anyone could use a thesaurus. I try and go by the school of thought: “Don’t use a five-dollar word when a fifty-cent word would work just as well.” A lot of the times more than speaking the content, it’s about communicating the content and there is a fine difference between the two. Two people delivering the same speech with the exact same words can have different impacts simply based on how they choose to present the information. Little things like pauses and enunciation, makes a big difference. The essence of my delivery lies in the art of making content resonate, not just in the words I choose but in how I choose to deliver them. It's in these subtle nuances—how I pause for effect, the emphasis I place on certain words, and my overall pacing—that truly differentiate impactful speaking. This approach underscores that powerful communication is as much about the listener's comprehension as it is about the speaker's expression. Question 1.3: What can you do to keep this/these canon(s) strong? (1 point)

CAS 100A Reflection on Personal Topics For me, I can focus on eloquence and structure to achieve the best outcome from this office of rhetoric, as can the skilled use of emotive language and rhetorical devices such as analogy, allusion, and alliteration. When I'm trying to persuade others, I make an effort to avoid anything that could distract them from my argument. I avoid giving them any reason to discredit me by being meticulous with correct grammar and usage. My approach varies depending on the platform and who I'm speaking to, incorporating techniques like metaphors, storytelling, and the use of visual aids. I strive to keep my sentences short, clear, and powerful, enhancing the elegance and effectiveness of my communication. I consciously choose words that are positive and motivational, deliberately avoiding language that might stir negative emotions such as fear, anger, or shame. Question 1.4: Which of the five canons do you think is/are ones that need the most work and why? (2 points) The question is subjective because it differs but in my personal preview, the most important one would be invention simply because its step 1 and if the foundation of a house isn’t strong enough, it wouldn’t ever stand as tall. It needs the most work because this is the point where we define the topic and analyze its various elements. This is also where we make sure that all terms are aren’t ambiguous or open to misinterpretation. This stage lays the groundwork for your entire rhetorical approach, allowing you to identify your main points, gather evidence, and strategize on how to present your ideas persuasively. It's essentially about developing the core of your message before moving on to organize and express it effectively. Question 1.5: What can you do to develop and strengthen this/these canon(s)? (1 point) For canon 1, Invention, my advice would be: Don't be tempted to embellish facts or massage statistics to advance your agenda. These are surefire ways to destroy your credibility. Think about who's listening. What do they know about your topic? What do they want to learn? Consider their backgrounds. When addressing a varied group, segmenting can aid in identifying each segment's specific needs. A thorough understanding of both your subject and your audience is vital for your message to persuade effectively. Part 2: Identity (6 points) Question 2.1: The Keywords entry on Identity describes something called an identity gap. In a few sentences, describe an identity gap that you have faced in your own life. An identity gap I've faced involves my self-perception as an organized person, contrasted with reality where I sometimes fall short of this ideal. This gap between how I view myself and my actual organizational habits has led to moments of self-reflection and a realization that my identity is more nuanced, with strengths and areas for growth. Question 2.2: What did the identity gap consist of? That is, which layers of your identity (personal, enactment, relational, communal) were not quite matching up?

CAS 100A Reflection on Personal Topics The identity gap I experienced was primarily at the personal layer of my identity. This gap arose between how I perceived myself as an organized individual and the actual state of my organizational practices. Essentially, there was a discrepancy between my internal self- conception and the external reality of my behaviors and habits in managing tasks and maintaining order in my daily life. This misalignment led to a realization that my self-view needed adjustment to more accurately reflect my true capabilities and areas for improvement. Question 2.3: What caused it? The cause of the identity gap related to my perception of being organized likely stems from a combination of overly optimistic self-assessment and the complex realities of daily life. It reflects a common human tendency to view ourselves in an idealized light, especially regarding traits we value, like organization. This discrepancy might also be influenced by external pressures and expectations, both personal and societal, that shape how we wish to see ourselves versus our actual behaviors and practices. Question 2.4: What, if anything, did you do to respond to it? In response to the identity gap, I have been actively working to align my self-perception with reality by improving my organizational skills. This involves adopting new strategies and tools to better manage my time and responsibilities, aiming to genuinely embody the organized persona I aspire to. This effort is a conscious attempt to reduce the gap between how I view myself and how I actually function, striving to be more in line with the perception of being organized that I value. Question 2.5: The Keywords entry on Identity states (warns?) that “in a public speaking class, you will inevitably hear perspectives that could complicate your understanding of ‘who you are.’” This is likely to happen in our unit on beliefs, and it is also likely to happen when we move into our units on persuasion. How do you typically respond when someone else says something that challenges, bothers, or offends you based on who you are and/or what you believe? (1 point) When faced with perspectives that challenge, bother, or offend me, I typically approach the situation with an open mind and a willingness to engage in constructive dialogue. I believe it's important to listen actively and try to understand where the other person is coming from, even if I disagree. This approach allows me to reflect on my beliefs and consider different viewpoints, which can be a valuable learning experience. I strive to respond respectfully and thoughtfully, aiming for a conversation that fosters mutual understanding rather than conflict. Question 2.6: What advice do you have for keeping our virtual classroom a (relatively) safe space, even when people have vehement disagreements with each other? (1 point) Biggest step would be to be self-reflective and mindful of the words we use. The best way to do that is to sensitize ourselves to current news and what’s going on in the world, so we are not unintentionally hurting people as we present our speeches. Before we submit our speeches, there

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

CAS 100A Reflection on Personal Topics should be a guideline to watch it ourselves to promote constructive dialogue and require participants to support their arguments with evidence. Part 3: Beliefs (2 points) Question 3.1: Identify an example of a topic that a speaker might use for a personal speech that might be too cliché to have much of an impact upon their audience. (1 point) A topic that might come across as too cliché for a personal speech and therefore might not significantly impact the audience is "The Importance of Following Your Dreams." While inspirational, this theme has been extensively explored in various speeches, books, and media, making it challenging for a speaker to present new insights or perspectives that captivate the audience. To have an impact, the speaker would need to find a unique angle or deeply personal story that sets their interpretation apart from common narratives. Question 3.2: Using the cliché topic from the previous question, explain how a speaker hypothetically could make it stronger and more specific. (1 point) To strengthen and specify the cliché topic of "The Importance of Following Your Dreams," a speaker could focus on a unique, personal experience that illustrates the challenges and rewards of pursuing a less conventional or particularly difficult dream. For instance, sharing a story about overcoming specific obstacles, such as financial hardship, societal expectations, or personal doubts, to achieve a dream adds depth and relatability. Incorporating concrete examples, lessons learned, and the tangible impact of following that dream on their life and others could make the speech more engaging and inspirational. Part 4: Narrative (4 points) Question 4.1: The Keywords entry on Narrative discusses communication scholar Walter Fisher’s narrative paradigm, which consists of narrative coherence and narrative fidelity. Define each in your own words (2 points). Walter Fisher's narrative paradigm includes two key concepts: narrative coherence and narrative fidelity. Narrative coherence refers to how well a story is internally consistent, meaning it makes sense and flows logically without contradictions. Essentially, it's about whether the story "hangs together" as a coherent whole. Narrative fidelity, on the other hand, deals with a story's truthfulness or reliability in reflecting reality. It assesses whether a story feels true and aligns with the listener's or reader's experiences and beliefs, questioning the authenticity and moral soundness of the narrative. Fisher's work emphasizes that stories are not just for entertainment but are fundamental to how we understand and navigate the world, highlighting the importance of both coherence and fidelity in making narratives persuasive and meaningful. Question 4.2: Consider one of your favorites (or least favorite) books, movies, TV shows, or other examples of a narrative that your classmates and instructor are likely to know. Does

CAS 100A Reflection on Personal Topics applying the concept of narrative fidelity help explain what makes this a good (or bad) story? Why or why not? (1 point) My least favorite book is a poem anthology by Rupi Kaur called "milk and honey". Applying the concept of narrative fidelity to the book helps understand the mixed reactions to its quality. For some, the book's straightforward, relatable exploration of themes like love, pain, and healing aligns with their experiences and truths, making it resonate deeply. This alignment—where the narrative feels true to one's own life experiences—can render it a powerful, validating read. However, critics argue that its simplicity and lack of depth fail to capture the complexity of these themes, suggesting a lower narrative fidelity for those who seek richer, more nuanced expressions of human emotion and experience. The book's impact, then, depends on individual experiences and expectations, illustrating the subjective nature of narrative fidelity. Considering Rupi Kaur's work in the context of narrative fidelity involves questioning the authenticity and reliability of her narratives. Kaur's poetry in "milk and honey" is grounded in personal and universal experiences, aiming to resonate with readers through shared emotions and situations. The fidelity of her stories can be evaluated by their ability to reflect genuine experiences, without distorting facts for emotional effect. The simplicity and directness of her writing can enhance the perceived authenticity, as it often mirrors the internal reasoning and decision-making processes of the reader, making the narratives relatable and credible. The importance of her stories is narrated through the lens of personal growth, healing, and empowerment, appealing to readers' values and potentially influencing their perspectives. Question 4.3: Is narrative fidelity a good way to judge the quality of a story? Why or why not? (1 point) Narrative fidelity can be a valuable metric for evaluating a story's quality, but it should not be the sole criterion. It measures how well a story aligns with the audience's experiences and values, contributing to its believability and impact. However, focusing only on narrative fidelity might overlook other essential aspects of storytelling, such as creativity, structure, and style. A story might be highly original and artistically executed yet not have high narrative fidelity for all audiences. Therefore, while narrative fidelity is important, assessing a story's quality comprehensively requires considering a range of factors.