OL620 4-2 Short Paper

docx

School

Southern New Hampshire University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

620

Subject

Business

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by CaptainComputer1749

1 Running head: Job Evaluation at Smith Upholstery Katie Allard OL620: 4-2 Short Paper Job Evaluation at Smith Upholstery March 24, 2024

2 JOB EVALUATION AT SMITH UPHOLSTERY What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of the simple ranking, alternate ranking, and point method job evaluation techniques? The Simple Ranking Method offers simplicity and quick implementation, making it easy for evaluators to understand and apply. However, its reliance on subjective judgment may introduce bias and limit differentiation between closely ranked jobs. The Alternate Ranking Method provides a relative comparison between jobs, reducing some biases compared to the simple ranking method. It strikes a balance between simplicity and detail, suitable for medium- sized organizations. Yet, its complexity and potential for bias remain drawbacks. Conversely, the Point Method stands out for its objectivity and detailed analysis by assigning numerical values to job factors and sub-factors (Martocchio, 2019). It offers flexibility for complex organizations but is time-consuming and requires specialized expertise. Despite its potential for disagreement among raters, its objectivity is a significant advantage. In the context of Smith Upholstery, where Robert opted for the Simple Ranking Method, speed of completion and his desire for a single evaluator indicate priorities over detailed analysis and objectivity. What problems may occur by following Robert’s approach? Robert's approach of employing the Simple Ranking Method and entrusting Marco with sole responsibility for conducting evaluations may result in several issues for Smith Upholstery. Firstly, relying on a single evaluator heightens the risk of bias and inconsistency in the evaluation process, potentially leading to inaccurate assessments of job roles. Secondly, the lack of detailed analysis provided by the Simple Ranking Method may obscure the specific factors and complexities of each job, making it challenging to establish fair pay rates (Martocchio, 2019). Moreover, employees may perceive the evaluation process as unfair, diminishing morale and potentially contributing to retention issues as individuals seek better-compensated opportunities

3 JOB EVALUATION AT SMITH UPHOLSTERY elsewhere. From a legal perspective, this simplified approach may also pose compliance risks with equal employment opportunity laws and regulations, particularly considering Marco's additional task of completing the affirmative action plan. Lastly, while the Simple Ranking Method offers a quick solution (Rogers, 2023), it may not align with the company's long-term strategic objectives, potentially hindering its ability to adapt to market changes and maintain competitiveness. Thus, Robert's prioritization of expediency over accuracy and fairness could jeopardize the company's ability to attract and retain top talent in the future. What do you recommend Marco do first? Why? Given the circumstances outlined in the scenario, I recommend that Marco address the urgent task assigned by Robert: completing the company's affirmative action plan. This task is already two weeks overdue, indicating its critical importance to the company's compliance and legal obligations. By prioritizing the affirmative action plan, Marco demonstrates responsiveness to Robert's immediate concerns and ensures that the company remains in good standing with regulatory requirements (Martocchio, 2019). Completing the affirmative action plan first also establishes credibility and trust with Robert, demonstrating Marco's reliability and commitment to fulfilling his responsibilities. Additionally, addressing this pressing task promptly (Kenton, 2023) allows Marco to focus on other projects, such as job descriptions and job evaluations, with a clear conscience and without the distraction of an overdue assignment looming over him. Once the affirmative action plan is completed, Marco can then turn his attention to the job description and job evaluation projects. He can engage with Robert to revisit the decision regarding the evaluation method, providing a well-reasoned argument for the benefits of using the Point Method or an alternative approach that aligns more closely with the company's long-

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

4 JOB EVALUATION AT SMITH UPHOLSTERY term goals and objectives. By demonstrating flexibility and adaptability in prioritizing tasks while advocating for best practices, Marco can effectively navigate the challenges presented by Robert's management style and contribute positively to the company's success.

5 JOB EVALUATION AT SMITH UPHOLSTERY References Kenton, W. (2023, September 30). What is affirmative action? how it works and example . Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/affirmative-action.asp Martocchio, J. J. (2019). Strategic Compensation (10th ed.). Pearson Education (US). https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/books/9780135175910 Rogers, K. (2023, November 21). Job Evaluation Classification & Methods | what is a job evaluation? . Study.com. https://study-com.translate.goog/learn/lesson/job-evaluation- classification-methods.html?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=id&_x_tr_hl=id&_x_tr_pto=tc

Related Documents

5.2 Case Study Corporations.docx

Union.docx

Vroom's expectancey.docx

VD-MBA548-Topic & Case Questions-24Spring.docx

Tesla Case Study.pdf

Chapter 4 final.pdf

_Module 7 Portfolio Milestone.docx

IBU606 Week Four Assignment.docx

Fine Tresses LLC Business Plan.pdf

Milestone Three.docx

Milestone 2 (2).docx

MBA 556 Final Spring 2024.docx

Recommended textbooks for you

Practical Management Science

Operations Management

ISBN:9781337406659

Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.

Publisher:Cengage,

Management, Loose-Leaf Version

Management

ISBN:9781305969308

Author:Richard L. Daft

Publisher:South-Western College Pub

Understanding Management (MindTap Course List)

Management

ISBN:9781305502215

Author:Richard L. Daft, Dorothy Marcic

Publisher:Cengage Learning

Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)

Marketing

ISBN:9781337386920

Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor

Publisher:Cengage Learning

Foundations of Business - Standalone book (MindTa...

Marketing

ISBN:9781285193946

Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor

Publisher:Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS

Recommended textbooks for you

Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,
Management, Loose-Leaf Version
Management
ISBN:9781305969308
Author:Richard L. Daft
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Understanding Management (MindTap Course List)
Management
ISBN:9781305502215
Author:Richard L. Daft, Dorothy Marcic
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Foundations of Business (MindTap Course List)
Marketing
ISBN:9781337386920
Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Foundations of Business - Standalone book (MindTa...
Marketing
ISBN:9781285193946
Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. Kapoor
Publisher:Cengage Learning