BUS210 6-3 Assignment Organizational Structure

docx

School

Southern New Hampshire University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

210

Subject

Business

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by MateTurkey2957

Report
BUS210 6-3 Assignment: Organizational Structure The original organizational structure for this company was formalized, with managers having a broad span of control from multiple departments and functions. Unfortunately, this resulted in a poor team culture and underuse of employee talents. Because of this, the company began to shift to less formalization to promote more creativity and autonomy amongst employees. While this has begun to satisfy employees, it’s leaving managers feeling overwhelmed and employees feeling under-supported. Employees also felt a lack of communication about current projects, leading to lack of information and defined work across management teams. In revising the original organizational structure, I wanted to use more of a hybrid approach of a more matrix organizational structure to help address the management and communication struggles the company is experiencing. Starting from the top down, the CEO now has 4 direct reports under them: Director of Shared Resources Group, HR manager, IT manager, and Marketing Manager, with each manager having their own function specific employees. This way, the “big picture” group remains intact, and relatively unchanged from the original structure. In the new structure, the Director of Products and the Director of Service now report to the Director of Shared Resources, who reports to the CEO. This now makes for less management direct reporting to the CEO, and instead the Director of Shared Resources supervises and supports both the Director of Products and Director of Service, who both have all function specific managers report to each of them. This is to ensure that both Directors are familiar with managers’ workloads and processes in relation to their own area (product and service) which they work on and oversee to report together to the Director of Shared Resources. Each employee group(Data Analysts, Designers, Developers, Graphic Designers, and QA Specialists) has their own manager. This is meant to help managers feel less overwhelmed and more confident and able to closely supervise and support their employees since they are focusing on one function/area of expertise. Each employee group is part of a team with other employee groups, each reporting not only to their respective manager, but to their Project Manager assigned as well. This further gives support to employee groups because Project Managers will be working with them directly, resolving the poor communication to team members about current projects. These team members now receive communication and support from both their own function specific managers as well as their Project Manager. All Project Managers work with multiple functions of each team to oversee projects and work with the Director of Shared Resources in reporting to the CEO. This hybrid approach to restructuring is more of a matrix organizational structure, giving Project Managers more structure and more power now being a bit higher in the organizational hierarchy. Matrix organizational structures “are created in response to uncertainty and dynamism of the environment and the need to give particular attention to specific products or projects.” (Soomo Learning, 2023). Since the company is trying to shift from their more traditional, formalized structure into a less formalized one to promote more creativity and innovativeness, the company is in a time of changing dynamics and uncertain environment, so more of a matrix structure here may help balance the benefits of product/service-based and traditional functional structures. (Soomo Learning, 2023). Overall, this change in structure should help increase both formal and informal communication, creating more fluid communication between managers and project managers, along with their team members, which will likely lead to increased cooperation among all
disciplines. While this isn’t a clear unity of command among lower level employees, it does promote more fluid communication between team members, and will likely lead to employees feeling more support while still maintaining freedom to be innovative and promote a team culture that the company is currently lacking. Employees can feel more free to be creative and use their talents fully, likely leading to higher employee satisfaction and motivation which will help ensure processes are completed to reach the organization’s goal. Above the managers, the Director of Products and Director of Service oversees all managers below them to ensure managers are meeting the needs of both areas. Managers report to both Directors of the company’s goods and service, who both then report to a Director of Shared Resources above them, who also can oversee and collaborate with the Project Managers when necessary. This way, the Director of Shared Resources oversees that both of those Directors are meeting their specific function and providing support as needed more generally, who then reports on both of those areas directly to the CEO. This delegates more responsibility to the Director of Shared Resources from the CEO. This way, the Directors can have more autonomy and empowerment and freedom to be innovative while also maintaining a chain of command and hierarchy of communication lines, while the CEO still oversees the products and services the company provides. The Director of Shared Resources has more of a broad description with multiple direct reports underneath them who maintain a good amount of control and freedom to be creative with how they do their job and manage those underneath them. The Director of Shared Resources can also work with the manager of HR, IT, and Marketing together to focus more on the “big picture”. Each HR, IT, and Marketing manager also maintains their function specific employees and play a role in more “big picture” strategies and functions of the organization. This still structures lines of communication further “at the top” with more fluid lines of communication the further you go down the hierarchy to the lower level of employees. Overall, this new structure promotes a team culture, innovativeness, and autonomy and can address the communication and management concerns the company had.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help