Lab 8 Cosmic Distance Ladder
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Spokane Falls Community College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
101
Subject
Astronomy
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
9
Uploaded by KidResolve12053
The Cosmic Distance Ladder
Remember to use blue text for your answers
Exercises
The Cosmic Distance Ladder Module consists of material on seven different
distance determination techniques. Four of the techniques have external simulators in
addition to the background pages. Work through the material for each technique before
moving on to the next technique.
Note: The Distance Modulus (DM) is
not
a distance
determination technique in itself.
The DM is the equation used to calculate distances in
many of the techniques.
Radar Ranging
Question 1
: Radar ranging can be used to directly determine the distance to a solid
object like Venus or Mercury, but not a gaseous object like the Sun.
Do some
research and summarize how radar ranging can be used to indirectly determine the
distance to the sun.
This is how the Earth-Sun distance is most accurately measured,
and we must know this distance for the stellar parallax method (and all others) to
work. (2 points)
Parallax
In addition to astronomical applications, parallax is used for measuring distances in other
disciplines such as surveying.
Open and investigate the
Parallax Explorer
,
where
techniques very similar to those used by surveyors are applied to the problem of finding
the distance to a boat out in the middle of a large lake. The simulator consists of a map
providing a scaled overhead view of the lake, and a road along the bottom edge where our
surveyor (represented by a red X) is located. The surveyor is equipped with a theodolite,
which is the combination of a small telescope and a large protractor that allows the angle
of the telescope orientation to be precisely measured. This instrument is mounted on a
tripod that can be moved along the road to establish a baseline.
Radar ranging can be used indirectly to find out the distance to the sun by timing the light echo.
The time it takes the light echo to return gives us an indirect calculation of the distance to the
sun.
An
Observer’s View
panel shows the appearance of the boat relative to trees on the far
shore through the theodolite.
Configure the simulator to
preset A
,
which allows us to see the location of the boat on
the map. Drag the position of the surveyor around and note how the apparent position of
the boat relative to background objects changes. Position the surveyor to the far left of
the road and click
take measurement.
This causes the surveyor to sight the boat
through the theodolite and measure the angle between the line of sight to the boat and
the road. Now position the surveyor to the far right of the road and click
take
measurement
again. The distance between these two positions defines the baseline of our
observations and the intersection of the two red lines of sight indicates the position of the
boat.
We now need to make a measurement on our scaled map and convert it back to a
distance in the real world. Check
show ruler
and use this ruler to measure the distance
from the baseline to the boat in arbitrary map units.
The ruler takes the place of the
trigonometric calculations the surveyor would actually use to determine the distance.
Use
the r uler to measure the perpendicular distance from the baseline to the boat in map
units.
Question 2
: Enter your perpendicular distance to the boat in map units.
Convert the map units to meters and show your work in the box below.
Configure the simulator to
preset B
. The parallax explorer now assumes that our
surveyor can make angular observations with a typical error of 3°. Due to this error we
will now describe an area where the boat must be located as the overlap of two cones as
opposed to a definite location that was the intersection of two lines. This preset is more
realistic in that it does not illustrate the exact position of the boat on the map.
Question 3
: Repeat the process of applying triangulation to determine the distance to
the boat and then answer the following:
What
is
your
best
estimate
for
the
perpendicular distance to the boat (in
meters)?
6.6x20m=132m
What is the greatest distance to the boat
that
is
still
consistent
with
your
observations (in meters)?
7.5x20m=150m
What is the smallest distance to the boat
that
is
still
consistent
with
your
observations (in meters)?
5.9x20m=118
7.5 unitd
7.5x20=150m
Distance Modulus
The distance modulus equation (m − M = −5 + 5 log
10
d) is used to find distances to objects
that are too far away to use parallax.
Since the distances to only the closest stars can be
determined using parallax, all other methods of finding distances rely on the distance
modulus equation.
Question 4
: Use the information in the Distance Modulus section to complete the
table below.
Apparent
Absolute
Distance
Star A
4
4
0
1
0
Star B
4
3
1
1
6
Star C
6
4
2
2
5
Star D
9
2
7
250
Spectroscopic Parallax
Open up the
Spectroscopic Parallax Simulator
. There is a panel in the upper
left entitled
Absorption Line Intensities
– this is where we can use information on the
types of lines in a star’s spectrum to determine its spectral type. There is a panel in the
lower right entitled
Star Attributes
where one can enter the luminosity class based upon
information on the thickness of line in a star’s spectrum. This is enough information to
position the star on the HR Diagram in the upper right and read off its absolute
magnitude.
Let’s work through an example.
Imagine that an astronomer observes a star to
have an apparent magnitude of 4.2 and collects a spectrum that has very strong helium
and moderately strong ionized helium lines – all very thick. Find the distance to the star
using spectroscopic parallax.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Let’s
first
find
the
spectral type. We can see in the
Absorption Line Intensities panel
that
for
the star to have any
helium lines it must be a very hot
blue
star.
By
dragging
the
vertical cursor we can see that for
the
star
to
have
very
strong
helium
and
moderate
ionized
helium lines it must either be O6
or O7.
Since the spectral lines
are all very thick, we can assume
that it is a main sequence star.
Setting the
star
to luminosity
class V in the Star Attributes panel then determines its position on the HR Diagram and
identifies its absolute magnitude as -4.1.
We can complete the distance modulus
calculation by setting the apparent magnitude slider to 4.2 in the Star Attributes panel.
The distance modulus is 8.3, corresponding to a distance of 449 pc. You should keep in
mind that spectroscopic parallax is not a particularly
precise technique even for
professional astronomers. In reality, the luminosity classes are much wider than they are
shown in this simulation, and distances determined by this technique probably have
uncertainties of about 20%.
Question 5
: Complete the table below by applying the technique of spectroscopic
parallax.
Observational Data
Analysis
m
Description of spectral lines
Description of line
thickness
M
m-M
d
(pc)
5.1
strong hydrogen lines
moderate helium lines
very
thin
0.7
4.40
147
11.5
strong molecular lines
very
thick
16
-4.5
1.26
4.8
strong ionized metal lines
moderate hydrogen lines
very
thick
3.1
1.7
21.5
Main Sequence Fitting
Open up the
HR Diagram Star Cluster Fitting Explorer
. Note that the main
sequence data for nearby stars whose distances are known are plotted by absolute
magnitude in red on the HR Diagram.
In the Cluster
Selection Panel,
choose the Pleiades cluster. The Pleiades data
are then added in apparent magnitude in blue.
Note that the two y-axes are aligned, but the
two main sequences don’t overlap due to the
distance of the Pleiades (since it is not 10
parsecs away).
If you move the cursor into the HR
diagram, the cursor will change to a handle,
and you can shift the apparent magnitude scale
by
clicking
and dragging.
Grab the cluster
data and drag it until the two main sequences
are best overlapped as shown to the right.
We can now relate the two y-axes.
Check
show
horizontal
bar,
which
will
automate the process of determining the offset
between the m and M axes.
Note that it
doesn’t matter where the horizontal bar is
placed vertically. At any point, the difference
between m and M will be the same and will
therefore yield the same distance modulus.
One set of values for the Pleiades gives m – M
= 1.6 – (-4.0) = 5.6, which corresponds to a
distance of 132 pc.
Question 6
: Determine the distance to the Praesepe cluster.
Apparent magnitude m
Absolute Magnitude M
Distance (pc)
13
6.9
166
Question 7
: Determine the distance to the Hyades cluster.
Apparent magnitude m
Absolute Magnitude M
Distance (pc)
12.1
6.5
132
Cepheids
Question 8
: A Type I Cepheid variable has an apparent magnitude of 12 and a
pulsation period of 3 days. Determine the distance to the Cepheid variable and explain
how you got your answer in the box below.
Supernovae
Open up the
Supernovae Light Curve Explorer
.
It functions similarly to
the Cluster Fitting Explorer. The red
line illustrates
the expected profile for a
Type I supernovae in terms of Absolute Magnitude.
Data from various supernovae
can be graphed in terms of apparent magnitude. If the data represents a Type I
Supernovae it should be possible to fit the data to the Type I profile with the
appropriate shifts in time and magnitude. Once the data fit the profile, then the
difference between apparent and absolute magnitude again gives the distance modulus.
As an example, load the data for 1995D.
Grab and drag the data until it
best matches the Type I profile as shown. One can then use the
show horizontal bar
option to help calculate the distance modulus. One pair of values is m – M = 13-(-20)
= 33 which corresponds to a distance of 40 Mpc.
Question 9
: Determine the distance to Supernovae 1994ae and explain how you got
your answer in the box below.
12-(-1)=-5+5log10 D (+5 to both sides and /5 both sides)
18/5=log10 d
D=10^18/5=3981pc
Using the example:type I profile helped me to figure out the magnitude at day 0 is ~13.
Absolut magnitude = -19.5.
13-(-19.5)=32.5
Using the distance module, the distance came out to 3.2x10^7pc.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Hubble’s Law
In this part of the lab you will make an investigation of Hubble’s Law; an empirical law
that relates the
recession velocity of galaxies to their distance from us. You will create a
Hubble graph and calculate a
value for the Hubble constant, and then use that value to
estimate the distance to a very distant galaxy.
This is the method used to find distances to
galaxies that are too far away to detect Cepheid variable stars, or in galaxies where no
other distance indicators (such as white dwarf supernovae) have been observed.
Realize
that it is more accurate to use a distance indicator if one can be found.
The universe contains billions of galaxies, including our own, the Milky Way. With only
a few nearby exceptions, these galaxies are all receding from us. Their recession velocity
can be measured
using the Doppler Effect, which is a change in the observed wavelength
of light relative to the wavelength we know must have been emitted by the stars in that
galaxy. Since the galaxies are moving away from us, the light is shifted towards longer
wavelengths,
or is
red-shifted
. By measuring the Doppler shift of the wavelength, the
speed of recession can be
calculated.
The best way to determine the distance to nearby galaxies is to find Cepheid variable
stars in that galaxy, measure their pulsation period, then use the established period-
luminosity relationship of Cepheids to determine their distance.
The galaxy’s position on a Hubble graph can be plotted once the recession velocity and
distance to the galaxy have been determined.
Using the recession velocity and distance information for the 5 galaxies listed below, plot
all the galaxies on the Hubble graph on the following page.
To plot a point, use the
‘Shapes’ option under the ‘Insert’ tab in this Word document to find a ‘Basic Shape’ you
would like to use.
Insert this shape onto the graph, then resize it and drag the shape to
the correct positon on the graph.
You do not need to label the data points.
Next, use the
‘Shapes’ option to draw a straight “best fit” line that goes from the origin through the
middle of the data point distribution.
Recall that the Hubble constant (H) is simply the
slope of this
line.
You can determine the slope of a straight line that begins at the origin by
picking any point on the line, and then divide the
y
coordinate (velocity) of the point by its
x
coordinate (distance).
If you cannot get the drawing tools to work in Word, you may print the following page, fill
it in by hand, then scan and send it to me along with your Word document.
Galaxy cluster
Recession Velocity (km/s)
Distance (Mpc)
Virgo
5000
65
Ursa Major
17,000
225
Corona
27,000
384
Bootes
42,000
600
Hydra
63,000
875
Question 10
:
What is the value of the Hubble constant, as determined from this data?
Round this value to the nearest whole number and show your work.
Be sure to include the
units for the Hubble constant.
Mpc stands for Megaparsecs, or millions of parsecs.
(3 points)
Go to the following Astronomy Picture of the Day:
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap180305.html
and move your cursor around the picture to see (and hear) the distances of different
galaxies.
The distances to galaxies in this Hubble Space Telescope deep field picture were
all found by measuring their redshifts to determine their velocities, then applying Hubble’s
Law (H = V/D) to find their distances.
Question 11:
Using the value you obtained for the Hubble constant in the previous
question, use Hubble’s Law to determine the distance to a galaxy whose recession velocity
is 100,000 km/s.
Show your work and express your answers in Mpc.
1700 km/s /225mpc= 76 km/s/mpc
100000km/s =76km/s/mpc X D
1000000/76=1315.79
76/76= cancels out
= 1316 mpc
Summary/Conclusion (5 points):
Which of the methods
that you investigated in this lab
is the most accurate for finding the distance to the
closest stars
?
What are the limitations
of this method?
Which of the methods
that you investigated in this lab
is the most accurate for finding the
distance to the
most distant galaxies?
For this question, assume you can see a standard
candle (object with known luminosity) in the galaxy.
What are the limitations of this method?
The trigonometric parallax is the most accurate for me when I am calculating the distance to the
closest stars. Despite being very straight forward, it is limited to stars that are closer (within a
thousand light years) and is a bit difficult. It is the most direct way to measure distance. To find
distant galaxies we have to use observation and astrophysics to make educated guesses based
on known parallaxes.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help