Session 4 Learning Exercise Oct 1 2023
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Colorado Christian University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
326A
Subject
Arts Humanities
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by MasterInternet8018
1
SESSION 4 LEARNING EXERCISE
Cody Colin
Colorado Christian University
BIB-326A
Dr. Nathan French
October 1, 2023
2
SESSION 4 LEARNING EXERCISE
What is the difference between foretelling and forth-telling, and what do either or both have to do with a study of the Old Testament prophets?
Forthtelling is an act of prophecy that speaks the word of God through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit to
edify oneself, while foretelling seeks to predict the future. Both have their roots in the Old Testament prophets, and prophets received their prophecy directly from God. It's important to note that when we speak of prophecy, we are primarily referring to speaking faith-filled words that edify, exalt, and comfort. Forthtelling is a powerful benefit of prophetic ministry that explains the present from God's perspective and brings strength to God's people to overcome the situation and move into His purposes.
what does the temple in Jerusalem have to do with any of the millennial views of eschatology?
Jerusalem's temple was at the heart of various eschatological hypotheses, desires, and beliefs. Regardless of their views, everyone believed that the temple would be the site of the eschatological conclusion. In Ezekiel 44, there is a vision of the eschatological temple. Jesus forewarned of God's impending destruction of Israel's magnificent temple, and many believed that the coming of Jesus, judgment, and rupture would be based on the temple in Jerusalem as a sign of the end of the world. This would be the point of separation between the righteous and the evil.
What connections could be made between the Pharaoh of Egypt prior to the Exodus and Nebuchadnezzar King of Babylon as recorded in Daniel chapters 1 – 4?
Both Pharaoh of Egypt and Nebuchadnezzar, the greatest king of the Chaldean dynasty of Babylonia, shared several similarities in their reigns. They both worshipped false idols, held people in captivity, had a misconstrued view of God, imposed harsh consequences, and were corrupted by power and tradition. However, both rulers had a revelation about God that transformed their lives.
3
Nebuchadnezzar II was known for his conquests of Syria and Palestine, and for making Babylon a splendid city. He even destroyed the Temple of Jerusalem and initiated the Babylonian Captivity of the Jewish population. Despite his power and success, he was still troubled by sin and power, and he eventually realized that his worldly ways were not godly. His patron god Marduk supposedly heard his prayer and made Babylon the most powerful city-state in the region. In the end, both stories serve as a reminder that even the most powerful rulers can be corrupted by sin and power, and that true godliness requires a prioritization of faith over worldly desires.
What connections could be made between some political cartoons and Daniel’s apocalyptic literature?
Political cartoons and apocalyptic literature from the Bible may seem like an unlikely pairing, but
there is a clear connection between the two in terms of symbolism and imagery. This can be seen in a cartoon that depicts Donald Trump as a golden calf, which is a false god mentioned in the Book of Exodus. This is a direct reference to the Israelites worshipping a golden calf as a false god, and the cartoonist is drawing a parallel between that and Trump's leadership. The Book of Revelation also mentions a similar image that is worshipped, which is associated with the Antichrist prophesied by Daniel
in his apocalyptic literature. By depicting Trump as the golden calf, the cartoonist is suggesting that he is a false leader who is worshipped by many, similar to the Antichrist. It is important to note, however, that this cartoon is a form of political commentary and not a literal interpretation of religious texts. The use of apocalyptic imagery in political cartoons is a common practice that allows cartoonists to critique and satirize political figures and events in a dramatic and impactful way.
Why is Edom representative of all “other nations” outside of Judah?
Edom was considered a weak nation, which is why it is often used as a representation of all "other
nations" outside of Judah. Although Edom lacked the strength to invade Judah by itself, it is likely that it formed alliances with other nations whenever the tides of change favored it. After the death of a famous
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
king, Edom rebelled, leading to the division of Israel into two separate kingdoms: Israel in the north, with Samaria as its capital, and Judah in the south, with Jerusalem as its capital. Although Edom was initially independent, it had to face the Kingdom of Judah and a resurgent Egypt as a result of the division.
5
References
Hays, D. J. (2010).The Message of the Prophets. : Zondervan Academic