Wild Fish VS Farmed Fish

docx

School

Western University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1021

Subject

Anthropology

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by CorporalResolve13615

Report
Wild Fish VS Farmed Fish Reyhan Khan Mr: Mohslehi Sat 23 rd April 2016
The Results
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 Wild Fish Harvested 1985-2006 Cod Redfish Herring Years Tonnes of Fish Harvested 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 Aquacuture Harvests 1986-2006 Salmon Trout Years Tonnes of Fish Harvested
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Questions 3. Describe any trends you see in the wild fish data. Earlier on in the years, there were more wild fish being harvested and then as time progressed (during the 1990’s) the harvests decreased substantially. In the 1980’s the amount of cod fish harvested was a significant amount above the rest of the fish being harvested. In 2006 the fisherman do not harvest much of Cod and Redfish but more of the Herring fish 4 . Some wild fish populations change more drastically then other. Suggest reasons for this. The wild fish population decreased in the 1990’s but the Cod fish in particular decreased by much more than the other fish. I believe the Cod fish dropped by a lot because in that time there might have been a disease in the fish that was spreading. This would cause an increase in mortalities making less harvest for the farmers. With a disease spreading it would be impossible for the fishers to catch the Cod fish without catching the disease 5 . What inferences can you draw about sustainability of the wild stocks over time? When looking at the graph, it is evident that the sustainability of the wild fish is decreasing and will continue to decrease over time. We know this because we can see how over time the harvests are decreasing meaning that the sustainability is also decreasing making it unsustainable. 6. Describe any trends you see in the farmed fish data In this graph we can see how the trout fish was the first fish to be aquatically harvested in 1986 and the Salmon fish started in the earlier 1990’s. When Salmon harvesting was discovered it was a hit and it continued to increase in popularity and is continuing to increase in popularity. 7 . What do the data from the farmed fish stocks suggest about the sustainability of aquaculture? The data in this graph shows that this was a questionable idea at first because there were many disadvantages but over time this has become a growing and popular idea and has increases the sustainable of aquaculture. The sustainability of the aquaculture is increasing
8. Research pros and cons of chosen methods. Consider the costs and benefits to society and environment. I have chosen the aquaculture harvests to research. Some of the pros for aquaculture could be that they are much easier to harvest and it will cost a lot less rather than buying all the materials to catch the fish you would just harvest them and there would be no problem. Just like there are pros, there are cons. Some cons are that they can infect wild stock fishes and if they escape and breed with the wild fish they will weaken the wild fish because of the disease spreading. Another con is the harm it may cause to the environment surrounding it Conclusion In conclusion we have learned that the Wild Fish Harvests are decreasing in popularity and are becoming more and more unsustainable because of things like diseases and better ways of harvesting in effect making the sustainability decrease over time. Aquaculture harvests are becoming more and more popular in the world and its sustainability is increasing as time goes by making it the most effective way of harvesting fish