MONTEBON-ANTHRO1022-Lab2

docx

School

Western University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1021A

Subject

Anthropology

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by ChiefDuckPerson642

Report
Anthropology 1022 Lab 2 – Brain and Body Size Evolution Anthropology 1022A – Lab 2 – Brain and Body Size Evolution – Response Template Name: Record your cranial measurements in this table, in cm, to one decimal place Maximum Cranial breadth (XCB) Nasion-Inion Length (NIL) Basion- Bregma height (BBH) Nasion- Prosthion Height (NPH) Cranial volume (cc) Pan troglodytes (Chimpanzee) 10.1 cm 11.0 cm 7.8 cm 69.2 mm 453.7 cc Australopithecus afarensis 8.0 cm 12.5 cm 8.6 cm 74.1 mm 450.3 cc Homo erectus (ergaster) 11.0 cm 14.5 cm 8.0 cm 47.3 mm 668.1 cc Homo neanderthalensis 10.8 cm 15.5 cm 10.3 cm 83.8 mm 1070.0 cc Homo sapiens 10.4 cm 15.1 cm 10.3 cm 64.1 mm 1018.3 cc Once you’ve recorded the measurements, estimate the cranial volume for each species using the following equation: Record your femur measurements here in cm, to one decimal place Femur Maximum Length (cm) Femur Head Diameter (mm) Chimpanzee 28.2 32.0 Australopithecus 26.5 21.3 Homo erectus 42.4 44.2 Homo neanderthalensis 45.6 51.5 Homo sapiens 47.8 44.5 1
Anthropology 1022 Lab 2 – Brain and Body Size Evolution Assignment Combining results for your cranial and postcranial measurements, what can you interpret about the timing and development of locomotion, brain and body size? How do your observations fit into the broader patterns of human evolution? (250 words) Response: The cranial measurements show that early humans' brains got larger and more complex as their bodies grew larger and they met new environmental challenges. They were able to process and store more information because of this cranial and brain alteration. As a result, early humans had a substantial advantage in their social interactions and contacts with unfamiliar ecosystems. The only exception to this rule is the evolution of the Neanderthal head. They possessed larger skulls and brains than modern humans because they also had larger bodies, demanding greater mental capacity. Human skulls also have less prognathism than earlier species, which is most likely due to a decrease in the number of teeth and chewing muscles. This development could be the result of dietary changes caused by human evolution, which drove them to consume more prepared meals and meat rather than fibre plants and fruits with tough skins. The femur measurements show the species' evolution in their bodies. Although both Australopithecus and Homo erectus originated in East Africa, the femur length differs significantly. The fossils of Australopithecus preserved climbing features, which may explain why their femurs are substantially shorter than those of Homo erectus. The Homo erectus' long, thin structure helped keep the body cool as it adapted to the hot, dry conditions. Neanderthals' bodies were wider but not much longer than Homo erectus'. Neanderthals' short and wide bodies helped them retain heat in their cold-climate surroundings. Finally, Homo sapiens are not significantly taller than Neanderthals, but are thinner, as evidenced by femur head measurements. Grading Rubric Please do not delete this rubric. The TAs will use this rubric to grade your discussion activity. The discussion activity will be graded out of 10 marks. Exceptional Response Meets Expectations Needs More Details Marks Summary and discussion of the major differences in cranial measurements All observed differences in cranial morphology are accurately described and thoughtfully interpreted. The most significant differences in cranial morphology are described and interpreted Differences are inadequately described and interpreted 4 4 marks 2-3 marks 0 - 1 mark Summary and discussion of the major differences in femur measurements All observed differences in femur morphology are accurately described and thoughtfully interpreted. The most significant differences in femur morphology are described and interpreted Differences are inadequately described and interpreted 3 3 marks 2 marks 0-1 mark Integration into discussion of broader trends in human evolution Thoughtful articulation of how the observed patterns in these species relate to broader trends in human evolution with Some relevant discussion of how the observed patterns relate to broader trends in human evolution No contextualization of the observed trends relative to broader pattern of human evolution 2 2
Anthropology 1022 Lab 2 – Brain and Body Size Evolution reference to other species or traits 2 marks 1 mark 0 Yes No Response length is within the response guidelines (250 words +/- 10%) No grammatical or spelling errors 1 mark 0 or 0.5 marks 1 3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help