Janie Pinedo Assigntment 8-TR==Ethics in Techology (1)

docx

School

Ashworth College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

PY360

Subject

Accounting

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by DeanSnowRat21

1 Janie Pinedo Student ID# AC1111904 PY360, Ethics in Technology Assignment 8, Ethics in Technology 12/11/2023 Ethics in Technology The Harms and Benefits of Privacy Privacy in the digital age has pros and cons. Keeping private data secret is essential to its ownership and control. Building your internet persona boosts confidence. Users need privacy to protect their money and personal data from online harassment. Online privacy is poor as data breaches and espionage harm humanity. A comprehensive privacy management strategy is needed to address these issues. Privacy promotes freedom and trust in the Information Age therefore users should trust internet data security. Privacy empowers and builds trust in an information-driven environment. Interactive and secure digital platforms enable information sharing while protecting privacy. Technology is useful in this era, but privacy breaches are rising. Surveillance and data collecting threaten privacy. Data breaches, targeted advertisements, and government surveillance violate privacy. Digital privacy and security ethics are growing harder to balance. Advanced data analytics and tracking, especially in targeted marketing, compromise privacy. Data breaches

2 demonstrate digital system weaknesses and the need for strong cybersecurity. Conflicts between national security and individual rights create moral difficulties. Personal freedom and social security must be balanced. Technology can improve or hinder privacy. Therefore, individual and community rights must be balanced. Privacy must be balanced with public safety and national security in this ethical setting. Tailoring social media content optimizes user experience by combining intimacy and privacy. This strategy customizes internet content to increase interactivity. Social media algorithms customize feeds and ads based on user activity. However, this customized approach raises privacy concerns. Advertising involves online activity tracking, whereas user-relevant material is preferable. Privacy and personalization are difficult to balance. Personalized content and privacy invasions are immoral. Content that suits your interests is different from continuous advertising. Online tracking may alarm users, but a personalized feed is convenient and fun. Social media firms must prioritize user experience and privacy in this age of intimacy and technology. Thanks to data analysis, the advertising knows precisely what I am looking for and want. The contrast makes us think about the problems people and society face daily. Discover the perfect balance between privacy and customization. It highlights the significance of talking about privacy in the dynamic digital landscape. Whistleblowing as a Moral Duty Richard De George and Carlos G. Bell Jr. argue that whistleblowing can hold organizations accountable for wrongdoing. They argue that it is morally necessary to come forward when mischief causes substantial harm and internal channels for resolving the issue are unsuccessful. According to consequentialist Richard De George, blowing the whistle is morally permissible if doing so averts catastrophic public damage and serves as a last option when other

3 means of resolving the issue have been exhausted. In agreement, Carlos G. Bell Jr. stresses the need for substantial action. They emphasize that internal routes must be finished, and the possible harm must be sufficient to warrant moral whistleblowing. According to Richard De George, the morality of blowing the whistle hinges on whether it stops harm that surpasses the damage that an individual might cause (Quinn, 2020). According to this perspective, society gains from exposing organizational misconduct. For instance, imagine a software engineer finding a deadly flaw in a medical device's code. Therefore, according to De George, whistleblowing is necessary to prevent patient harm. Engineers with a consequentialist moral compass put the welfare of others ahead of their financial interests. Consequently, De George advocates for whistleblowing to strengthen community safety and ethics. The bravery and integrity displayed by institutional whistleblowers are emphasized by virtue ethics proponent Carlos G. Bell, Jr (Quinn, 2020). Whistleblowing is morally commendable because it promotes transparency and responsibility. An employee who reveals fraudulent accounting practices to the company is a perfect example. Bell emphasizes that whistleblowing is morally admirable and helps minimize harm. This view emphasizes the importance of ethics in guiding a group or a community. As a matter of moral courage and commitment, virtue ethics focuses on blowing the whistle about the consequences to one's character and integrity. However, Whistleblowing, according to skeptics, raises critical ethical questions. People may punish whistleblowers if they report wrongdoing through internal methods. Honest assessments of whistleblowing should consider the dangers the whistleblower faces. While doing the right thing from a moral standpoint, whistleblowing might put the whistleblower's well-

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

4 being, reputation, and safety at risk. Reporting wrongdoing is a duty, and whistleblowers must weigh the risks against the benefits. The Winner-Take-All Society and Its Harmful Effects According to Robert Frank and Philip Cook, the winner-take-all society promotes small performance disparities with enormous rewards (Quinn, 2020). This modern-era socioeconomic phenomenon influences income distribution, job pathways, and societal inequality. In this model, small performance advantages yield exponential returns. This widens gaps and concentrates success, leaving most individuals needing more resources. Winner-take-all increases social inequality, making it harder for people experiencing poverty to survive. Frank and Cook demonstrate how a system where modest performance discrepancies lead to massive result differences influences modern socioeconomic structures. In the winner-take-all economy, even a slight advantage leads to market dominance, leaving others fighting for relevance. One distinctive product or service might help a digital firm stand out, limiting underrepresented groups' resources. Competitors require tech-like advantages. In this winner-take-all scenario, even little performance differences can affect results. This arrangement concentrates power and riches in a few successful enterprises. Winner-take-all creates economic inequity as digital giants hoard resources. Consolidation, resource constraints, and inequality hurt small businesses. Tech industry winner-take-all economies represent access and achievement-based social and economic inequality. Examine industry, policy, and social systems to promote inclusion and equity. Frank and Cook emphasize winner-take-all's ethical and business effects. In a winner- take-all system, fierce competition can misallocate resources and destabilize business. Pressure

5 to succeed and overcome competitors can lead to deception and labor abuse. In a winner-take-all economy, researchers may compromise ethics for money and fame. Financial aid and professional status may cause people to ignore ethics, highlighting ethical issues in a wealth- driven society. Winner-take-all economies enhance competition and unequal incentives, causing industry-wide ethics difficulties. This demands ethical decision-making to ensure success and growth do not compromise ethics, worker treatment, research, or corporate integrity. Sustainable and responsible economies must address these ethical issues. In conclusion, the Information Age ethical landscape requires balancing privacy, whistleblowing, and economic structure consequences on society. Ethical frameworks must evolve with technology to promote digital responsibility in individuals and enterprises. Understanding the complex link between individual liberty and community security in privacy, whistleblowing, and winner-take-all resource allocation ethics is crucial. These elements give the fast-growing ICT sector an Information Age ethical compass. Open communication advances technological ethics. Rapid ICT growth presents many challenges, yet this discourse encourages ethical and responsible solutions. Ethics could make the Information Age fairer, juster, and more accountable for society.