Assignment 1 Auditing

In 2001 and 2002 there were several high-profile US corporate collapses associated with misleading financial statements and accounting practices. Following these collapses, new laws were introduced to improve the quality of financial reporting. a) In your opinion, will further regulation prevent deliberately misleading reporting? Explain. b) Are additional laws likely to prevent corporate collapses? Why or why not? c) How important is the enforcement of financial reporting requirements in promoting high quality reporting?

oshiba - a case of internal audit failure The 140-year-old pillar of Japan Inc is caught up in the country's biggest accounting scandal since 2011 Asish K Bhattacharyya   Toshiba, a 140-year-old pillar of Japan Inc, is caught up in the country's biggest accounting scandal since 2011. In 2011, Olympus Corp was embroiled in a scandal. In July 2015, Toshiba Corp president Hisao Tanaka and his two predecessors quit after investigators found that the company inflated earnings by at least $1.2 billion during the period 2009-2014. Toshiba is one of the early adopters of the corporate governance reforms initiated in Japan. The corporate governance structure met corporate governance standards. Time and again cases of corporate governance failures have provided evidence that good corporate governance structure does not necessarily lead to good corporate governance. Organisation culture is a critical determinant of the quality of corporate governance. Some of the observations of the independent…

Identify one (1) real-life ‘financial reporting accounting fraud’ that occurred post 1990 (i.e. in the last 30 years), in any country, and answer the following questions: a) Discuss what specific accounting regulations were violated?

Question 4: Case Study The Enron scandal, revealed in October 2001, eventually led to the bankruptcy of the Enron Corporation, an American energy company based in Houston, Texas, and the de facto (complete) dissolution of Arthur Andersen, which was one of the five largest audit and accountancy partnerships in the world. In addition to being the largest bankruptcy reorganization in American history at that time, Enron was attributed as the biggest audit failure. Enron's auditor firm, Arthur Andersen, was accused of applying reckless standards in its audits because of a conflict of interest over the significant consulting fees generated by Enron. During 2000, Arthur Andersen earned $25 million in audit fees and $27 million in consulting fees from Enron. Enron hired numerous Certified Public Accountants as well as accountants who had worked on developing accounting rules with the Financial Accounting Standards Board. The accountants searched for new ways to save the company money,…

Below are several statements about the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX).1. SOX represents legislation passed in response to several accounting scandals in the early 2000s.2. The requirements outlined in SOX apply only to those companies expected to have weak internal controls or to have manipulated financial statements in the past.3. Section 404 of SOX requires both company management and auditors to document and assess the effectiveness of a company’s internal control processes that could affect financial reporting.4. Severe financial penalties and the possibility of imprisonment are consequences of fraudulent misstatement.5. With the establishment of SOX, management now has primary responsibility for hiring an external audit firm.6. The lead auditor in charge of auditing a particular company must rotate off that company only when occupational fraud is suspected.Required:State whether the answer to each of the statements is true or false.

Ans

?!

What are some of the possible reasons for the numerous corporate accounting scandals discovered during 2001 and 2002?

ESB. ACCOUNTING CONNECTION Careful scrutiny of accounting records and financial statements can lead to the discovery of fraud or embezzlement. Each of the situations that follow may indicate a breakdown in internal control. Indicate the nature of the pos- sible fraud or embezzlement in each of these situations. 1. Wages expense for a branch office was 30 percent higher in 2014 than in 2013, even though the office was authorized to employ only the same four employees and raises were only 5 percent in 2014. 2. Sales returns and allowances increased from 5 percent to 20 percent of sales in the first two months of 2014, after record sales in 2013 resulted in large bonuses for the sales staff. 3. Gross margin decreased from 40 percent of net sales in 2013 to 20 percent in 2014, even though there was no change in pricing. Ending inventory was 50 percent less at the end of 2014 than it was at the beginning of the year. There is no immediate explanation for the decrease in inventory. 4. A…

e. Of the following, the most significant risk factor relating to the risk of misstatement arising from fraudulent financial reporting for SSC is that: Multiple Choice Company officers serve on the board of directors. The company must refinance a significant portion of its debt. The company operates in the Bisbee, Arizona, area. The company paid no dividend this year. Untitled docume...pdf Untitled docume....pdf docx Presentation se....pdf Untitled docume...pdf 身

In thinking about overcoming the negative publicity and securities fraud fines related to revenue fraud, some companies succeed and move on, while others fail following the fraud. What forces might influence corporate “survivability” in the face of financial reporting fraud related to revenue?

Subject: Accounting Information System ETHICS, FRAUD, AND INTERNAL CONTROL Stated Problem: EXPENSE ACCOUNT FRAUD While auditing the financial statements of Petty Cor-poration, the certified public accounting firm of TrueBlue and Smith discovered that its client’s legal expenses account was abnormally high. Further investigation of the records indicated the following:•Since the beginning of the year, several disbursements totaling $15,000 had been made to the law firm of Swindle, Fox, and Kreip.•Swindle, Fox, and Kreip were not Petty Corporation's attorneys. A review of the canceled checks showed that they had been written and approved by Mary Boghas, the cash disbursements clerk. Boghas’s other duties included performing the end-of-month bank reconciliation. Subsequent investigation revealed that Swindle,Fox, and Kreip are representing Mary Boghas in an unrelated embezzlement case in which she is the defendant. The checks had been written in payment of her personal legal fees.…

ABC Corporation (the "Company") incurred heavy losses over the past 10 years resulting in deficit and liquidity problems. The Company considers borrowing from different banks as a way to produce more funds for the company to continue operation and possibly, recover from losses.  However, banks are afraid to grant loans to the Company due to recent issues with fraudulent issuance of financial statements by the companies just to obtain loans.In line with the above scenario, what good corporate governance practices may be implemented by the company to increase the confidence of banks (lenders) and avoid the high probability of issuing misstated financial statements by the company?   - Have an independent external audit   - Require internal audit to conduct examination/audit of Company’s FS   - Have the financial statements certified by BIR, Management, and SEC before submission to Banks   - Increase integrity and loyalty of BOD

The following paragraphs describe fraudulent accounting committed by the company Rite-Aid in 1999. After reading the paragraphs, list the journal entries you think Rite-Aid would have used to do what is described here. You will have to make an educated guess as to what journal entries the company would use to cover up the fraud. In the fourth quarter of FY 1999, Rite Aid prematurely recognized $17 million relating to a litigation settlement with a vendor. Rite Aid should not have recognized this sum in that period because the settlement offer was expressly contingent upon the execution of a formal settlement agreement which did not take place until May 20, 1999. Moreover, the litigation settlement was also contingent upon the execution of a purchasing agreement that was not finalized until May 18, 1999. Both of these contingencies were expressly stated in the February 26, 1999 letter of intent signed by Grass.