Case Study 1_Richard Cotton

docx

School

Saint Leo University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

505

Subject

Accounting

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

6

Uploaded by DeanWildcatMaster364

Report
Case Study 1: Cantaloupe Inc Accounting Fraud Case Study 1: Cantaloupe Inc Accounting Fraud Richard Cotton Saint Leo University Fraud Examination ACC-505-MBOL1 Professor C'Lamt Ho 1
Case Study 1: Cantaloupe Inc Accounting Fraud 1.) To start, Cantaloupe Inc formerly known as USAT Inc during the time of the incident was charged by the SEC with financial statement fraud for improper revenue recognition. This was done by USAT through them using non-GAAP compliant accounting methods to bill for goods but hold them until the next quarter (Posner, 2023). This fraud occurred from the 3 rd quarter of FY2017 through the third 3rd of FY2018. The fraud was perpetrated by 2 executives pressuring clients to agree to purchases they did not want nor need and even if they declined would mark the sale as “bill to hold”. Later taking it off the books after the fiscal quarter has closed but still representing it in financial statements for the quarter. The conclusion of the case came after the total in overstated revenue was found to be $4.61 million in total between FY2017 and FY2018. The SEC lobbied a fine of 1.5 million dollars against the company as well as applying civil penalties to two executives totaling 90 thousand dollars (Brasseur, 2023). 2.) The fraud perpetrated by Cantaloupe Inc was the direct result of executive leadership namely the executive Vice President and Chief Services Officer at the time bypassing internal accounting controls. This was done by the two executives working together to pressure both external customers to comply with actions that would result in improper revenue recognition and by the executives pressuring internal staff. The external pressure was done through agreeing to make bad sales they knew would be returned or shipping incorrect products intentionally at the end of a quarter to recognize that revenue. The internal pressure was used to push financial reporting out on a faster than usual pace or altering terms and conditions within customer arrangements. This allowed these two executives who were receiving cash bonuses to achieve higher bonuses based upon the fraudulent numbers. 2
Case Study 1: Cantaloupe Inc Accounting Fraud 3.) The victims were the external customers as well as the shareholders of Cantaloupe Inc. First, the external customers over the course of the yearlong scheme were frequently shipped obsolete devices, defective products or were coerced in some fashion into deals they otherwise would not have made. All of these things were known to the executives perpetrating the fraud and was kept suppressed through the control they had within the organization. As for the other victim the shareholders of Cantaloupe they saw the stock price rise by 40% during the period this fraud was committed due to the financial overstatements (McGraw, 2023). This would mean that not only existing shareholders but new shareholders who decided based on potential dishonest information Cantaloupe was a good investment were deceived. As, after the fraud was uncovered the stock fell from $15.90 to $3.44 which is a 79% drop in value. Overall, even though the external customers were impacted I believe the bigger victim in this fraud scheme were the shareholders due to the drastic loss in stock value. 4.) From my research and reading over some sections of the textbook I’ve come to find that forensic investigation methods are not meant to be preventative. Due to the nature of financial statement fraud, it is nearly impossible trace every revenue streams a company has back to its source. So, with that in mind forensic investigation is meant to be a tool that is used as an analytical method to look into irregularities found within a financial report. Through methods such as analysis of digit patterns, combing through currently intact accounting policies within an organization that could be vulnerable to abuse and evaluating risk (Gottlieb, 2016). Digit patterns are a logic-based test that an auditor or fraud examiner would use to review a company’s financial statements and look for patterns across a few different periods of statements. Noting both the patterns that emerge 3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Case Study 1: Cantaloupe Inc Accounting Fraud and when those patterns are deviated from then reviewing the trend for any potential fraud. Next, is combing through the accounting policies of a company to ensure that there are no policies that don’t align with GAAP or seem to be easily exploitable. Examples could be policies that have an executive override function and upon review that function is used on a frequent basis. As the exploitation of that override could be a red flag that fraud is occurring at a level where a particular executive is not having their work reviewed. Finally, evaluating risk is another forensic method that can be used namely by observing different kinds of warning signs. These warning signs can be financial, behavioral, organizational or business process based. This allows for an auditor or examiner to hone in on more specific areas that may need to be addressed without having to analyze every part of a company for fraud as often warning signs will point in the direction of active fraud. With those things in mind there are different applications and software that can be used to detect fraud as well as help research it. There are Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software options that exist as a strong tool to detect, diagnose and assist with the investigation of fraud (Beaver, 2022). By acting as a comprehensive tracking system for a company’s resources it cannot be manipulated or bypassed without sending out notifications alerting to potential abuse. Additionally, it can provide data that allows auditors to review different patterns of non-compliance and address them proactively. This allows for audit teams to get out in front of fraud by showing that things are being monitored closely as well as clear up any unintentional errors that could make fraud more likely. With the utility of an ERP in mind I believe if Cantaloupe Inc. had an ERP system in place it would have made it much easier to catch the two executive who were committing financial statement fraud. This could’ve been done via the ERP 4
Case Study 1: Cantaloupe Inc Accounting Fraud system’s ability to notify auditors when the frequent process bypasses were occurring. As well as, when they were committing the fraud by having resources allocated in a way that was not planned for. Since that would’ve created many data points for which a trend would’ve begun to develop and been flagged for further investigation. To conclude, Cantaloupe Inc. was found to be guilty of financial statement fraud and with improved forensic investigation processes and an ERP system they could prevent this kind of fraud in the future. 5
Case Study 1: Cantaloupe Inc Accounting Fraud References: Beaver, S. (2022, April 7). Financial statement fraud: Detection & prevention . Oracle NetSuite. https://www.netsuite.com/portal/resource/articles/accounting/financial-statement- fraud.shtml Brasseur, K. (2023, June 8). Cantaloupe fined $1.5m in SEC Accounting Fraud Case . Compliance Week. https://www.complianceweek.com/regulatory-enforcement/cantaloupe- fined-15m-in-sec-accounting-fraud-case/33177.article Gottlieb, M. (2016, September 6). Detecting financial statement fraud . Mark S. Gottlieb. https://www.msgcpa.com/forensicperspectives/detecting-financial-statement-fraud/ #:~:text=Forensic%20analytic%20methods%2C%20however%2C%20can,risk%20based %20on%20inconsistent%20data. McGraw, M. (2023, June 5). United States of America before the Securities and Exchange Commission ... Sec.Gov. https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/admin/2023/33-11202.pdf Posner, C. (2023, June 15). SEC charges improper revenue recognition practices-still A hot topic for sec enforcement . Cooley PubCo. https://cooleypubco.com/2023/06/15/sec-charges- improper-revenue-recognition/ 6
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help