CJ112ModThreeAssignmentEHeath

docx

School

Southern New Hampshire University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

112

Subject

Accounting

Date

Jun 4, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by emrachheath

CJ 112 Module Three Assignment: Emily Heath The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees several rights to citizens in criminal prosecutions. These rights embody the right to a speedy and public trial, entitlement to an impartial jury, entitlement to the information of the nature and cause of the accusation, the right to face witnesses, the right to compel witnesses to testify, and the right to legal representation ( Due Process of Law: Crash Course Government and Politics #28 2015). However, under certain circumstances, the citizens' rights under the Sixth Amendment may not apply. This particularly becomes the case in situations where individuals, due to overcrowded court dockets or delays in the legal proceedings, are forced to endure prolonged pre-trial detention. This could inadvertently infringe upon their right to a speedy trial. An illustrative example can be found in instances where law enforcement seeks evidence without proper warrants or conducts warrantless searches. While professionals aim to maintain public safety, these actions can conflict with the Fourth Amendment's protection against the unreasonable searches and seizures that may occur. Given that these potential conflicts may arise, it's crucial for criminal justice professionals to uphold a suspect's right to legal representation. This means they can't interrogate or question a suspect without allowing them proper access to an attorney, which can potentially halt a swift investigation. The right to confront witnesses may limit the use of certain evidence or testimonies that cannot be subjected to cross-examination, impacting the prosecution's case. Imagine a scenario where the prosecution presents a witness who claims to have seen the accused commit the crime, but the accused's attorney is unable to cross-examine the witness due to their absence. This absence of cross-examination could severely undermine the prosecution's case. The challenges of conducting a thorough and comprehensive investigation within the time constraints

of a speedy trial may potentially compromise the quality of the case criminal justice professionals present. Law enforcement must ensure that individuals are adequately informed of the charges against them. Neglecting this may lead to legal challenges that hinder the progress of the case. Ensuring an impartial jury may restrict the selection process for criminal justice professionals, limiting their ability to control the composition of the jury for strategic reasons.

References YouTube. (2015). Due Process of Law: Crash Course Government and Politics #28. YouTube. Retrieved November 12, 2023, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyHWRXAAgmQ.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version