Engineering economic analysis provides useful input in all of the following situations except which one. (a). Determining how much we should pay for a machine that will provide savings. (b). Determining the priority of investing our company’s retained earnings . (c). Illustrating the economic advantages of one alternative over other feasible choices. (d). Convincing management that one person should be hired over another.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter D, Problem 1P

To determine

Engineering economic analysis provides useful input in all of the following situations except which one.

(a). Determining how much we should pay for a machine that will provide savings.

(b). Determining the priority of investing our company’s retained earnings.

(c). Illustrating the economic advantages of one alternative over other feasible choices.

(d). Convincing management that one person should be hired over another.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 1P

Option D is the situation in which engineering economic analysis does not provides a useful input.

Explanation of Solution

Engineering economic analysis is analyzing the economy and its effect on the engineering. How our economy helps in engineering and how engineering provides useful tools and techniques for the development of the society as a whole.

Engineering economic analysis provides useful input in all of the following situations.

(a) Determining how much we should pay for a machine that will provide savings.

(b) Determining the priority of investing our company’s retained earnings.

(c) Illustrating the economic advantages of one alternative over other feasible choices.

As the process used in engineering economic analysis helps us in determining how much we should pay for a machine that will provide savings. Investment and savings is one of the most important concept of economics that is even used by engineers for the betterment of their projects and the betterment of the economy as a whole.

It helps us in determining from a pool of investment that which alternative should be selected first, which one will provide that maximum benefits and maximum return.

It helps us in determining the advantages of one alternative over the other so that the best results can be obtained.

Engineering economic analysis does not provide useful input in convincing the management that one person should be hired over another. As this is the task of human resource manager and the management has to decide the qualitative aspect attached with the selection of the person to be hired. So this is the work of management engineering economic analysis has no role to play in this situation.

Conclusion:

So, Option D is the situation in which engineering economic analysis does not provides a useful input.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

1. A town relies on four different sources for its non-drinking water needs: dam water, reclaimed water, rain water, and desalinated water. The different sources carry different risks and costs. For instance, desalinated water is fully reliable due to abundant sea water, but it is more expensive than other options. Reclaimed water also has relatively lower risk than rain or dam water since a certain amount can be obtained, even during the dry. season, by the treatment of daily generated waste water. Using any of the four options requires an investment in that resource. The return on a particular water source is defined as the amount of water generated by the source per dollar of investment in it. The expected returns and standard deviations of those returns for the four water sources are described in the following table: Water resource Expected return St. Deviation Dam water 2.7481 0.2732 Reclaimed water 1.6005 0.0330 Rain water 0.5477 0.2865 Desalinated water 0.3277 0.0000 Higher…

1. Imagine a society that produces military goods and consumer goods, which we'll call "guns" and "butter." a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for guns and butter. Using the concept of opportunity cost, explain why it most likely has a bowed-out shape. b. Show a point that is impossible for the economy to achieve. Show a point that is feasible but inefficient. c. Imagine that the society has two political parties, called the Hawks (who want a strong military) and the Doves (who want a smaller military). Show a point on your production possibilities frontier that the Hawks might choose and a point the Doves might choose. d. Imagine that an aggressive neighboring country reduces the size of its military. As a result, both the Hawks and the Doves reduce their desired production of guns by the same amount. Which party would get the bigger "peace dividend," measured by the increase in butter production? Explain.

A health study tracked a group of persons for five years. At the beginning of the study, 20%were classified as heavy smokers, 30% as light smokers, and 50% as nonsmokers. Resultsof the study showed that light smokers were twice as likely as nonsmokers to die duringthe five-year study, but only half as likely as heavy smokers.A randomly selected participant from the study died during the five-year period. Calculatethe probability that the participant was a heavy smoker

Answer 2