![EBK USING MIS](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/8220103633642/8220103633642_largeCoverImage.jpg)
The spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel file Ch01Ex01_U10e.xlsx contains records of employee activity on special projects. Open this workbook and examine the data that you find in the three spreadsheets it contains. Assess the accuracy, relevancy, and sufficiency of this data to the following people and problems.
- a. You manage the Denver plant, and you want to know how much time your employees are spending on special projects.
- b. You manage the Reno plant, and you want to know how much time your employees are spending on special projects.
- c. You manage the Quota Computation project in Chicago, and you want to know how much time your employees have spent on that project.
- d. You manage the Quota Computation project for all three plants, and you want to know the total time employees have spent on your project.
- e. You manage the Quota Computation project for all three plants, and you want to know the total labor cost for all employees on your project.
- f. You manage the Quota Computation project for all three plants, and you want to know how the labor-hour total for your project compares to the labor-hour totals for the other special projects.
- g. What conclusions can you make from this exercise?
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Explanation of Solution
a.
Time taken by employees for completing the special project in Denver plant:
Special project at Denver involves Market Analysis, Quota computation, Sourcing review and Production planning.
- Time taken by employees for Quota computation is “22+30+17+31=100” hours.
- Time taken by employees for Market analysis is “17+21=38” hours.
- Time taken by employees for sourcing review is “9+22+10+21+5=67” hours.
- Time taken by employees for production planning is “12+15+21+35+20+19=122 hours”
Therefore, time taken by employees for completing the special project in Denver plant is “327”hours.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Explanation of Solution
b.
Time taken by employees for completing the special projects in Reno plant:
Special project at Reno plant involves Quota computation, Sourcing review and Production planning.
- Time taken by employees for Quota computation is “27+42=69” hours.
- Time taken by employees for Sourcing review is “17+23+21+27=88” hours.
- Time taken by employees for Production planning is “19+20+11=50” hours.
Therefore, the time taken by employees for completing the special project in Reno plant is “207” hours.
c.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Explanation of Solution
Time taken by employees for Quota Computation in Chicago plant:
Time taken by employees for special project at Chicago plant for Quota computation is: “27+12+22+29+11+29 = 130” hours.
Therefore, the time taken by employees for computation in Chicago plant is “130” hours.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Explanation of Solution
d.
Total time taken by employees for Quota Computation for all plants:
Time taken by employees for special project at Chicago plant, Denver plant and Reno plant for Quota computation is:
- Time taken by employees for Quota computation in Denver plant is “22+30+17+31=100” hours.
- Time taken by employees for Quota computation in Reno plant is “27+42=69” hours.
- Time taken by employees for special project at Chicago plant for Quota computation is: “27+12+22+29+11+29 = 130”hours.
Therefore, the total time taken by employees is: “100+69+130=299” hours.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Explanation of Solution
e.
Total labor cost for all employees in the Quota computation project:
- Suppose the hourly pay of an employee is “$30”.
- The number of hours worked by the employees on Quota computation project is “299” hours.
Labor cost= hourly wage × number of hours = 30 × 299 = $8970
Therefore, the total labor cost for all employees in the quota computation project is “8970$”.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Explanation of Solution
f.
Comparison of labor hour total for Quota computation with other projects:
- The total time taken by employees for Quota computation is: “100+69+130=299” hours.
- The total time taken by employees for market analysis is “38” hours.
- The total time taken by employees for sourcing review is “67+88+52=207” hours.
- The total time taken by employees for production planning is “122+75+50 =247” hours.
Thus, the ratio of Quota computation with Market analysis = 299/38=7.86 hours, the ratio of Quota computation with sourcing review = 299/207=1.44 hours, and the ratio of Quota computation with production planning = 299/247= 1.21 hours.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Explanation of Solution
g.
Conclusion:
From the above questions, it can be observed that Quota computation almost takes “37%” of the total time taken to complete all projects as compared to the projects – market analysis, sourcing review and production planning.
Therefore, it can be said that the labor employed in Quota computation project is less efficient as compared to the other three projects.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter AE Solutions
EBK USING MIS
Additional Engineering Textbook Solutions
Java: An Introduction to Problem Solving and Programming (8th Edition)
SURVEY OF OPERATING SYSTEMS
Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)
Starting Out with C++ from Control Structures to Objects (9th Edition)
Computer Science: An Overview (13th Edition) (What's New in Computer Science)
Introduction To Programming Using Visual Basic (11th Edition)
- EX:[AE00]=fa50h number of ones =1111 1010 0101 0000 Physical address=4AE00h=4000h*10h+AE00h Mov ax,4000 Mov ds,ax; DS=4000h mov ds,4000 X Mov ax,[AE00] ; ax=[ae00]=FA50h Mov cx,10; 16 bit in decimal Mov bl,0 *: Ror ax,1 Jnc ** Inc bl **:Dec cx Jnz * ;LSB⇒CF Cf=1 ; it jump when CF=0, will not jump when CF=1 HW1: rewrite the above example use another wayarrow_forwardEX2: Write a piece of assembly code that can count the number of ones in word stored at 4AE00harrow_forwardWrite a program that simulates a Magic 8 Ball, which is a fortune-telling toy that displays a random response to a yes or no question. In the student sample programs for this book, you will find a text file named 8_ball_responses.txt. The file contains 12 responses, such as “I don’t think so”, “Yes, of course!”, “I’m not sure”, and so forth. The program should read the responses from the file into a list. It should prompt the user to ask a question, then display one of the responses, randomly selected from the list. The program should repeat until the user is ready to quit. Contents of 8_ball_responses.txt: Yes, of course! Without a doubt, yes. You can count on it. For sure! Ask me later. I'm not sure. I can't tell you right now. I'll tell you after my nap. No way! I don't think so. Without a doubt, no. The answer is clearly NO. (You can access the Computer Science Portal at www.pearsonhighered.com/gaddis.)arrow_forward
- Np Ms Office 365/Excel 2016 I NtermedComputer ScienceISBN:9781337508841Author:CareyPublisher:CengageDatabase Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...Computer ScienceISBN:9781305627482Author:Carlos Coronel, Steven MorrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...Computer ScienceISBN:9781285196145Author:Steven, Steven Morris, Carlos Coronel, Carlos, Coronel, Carlos; Morris, Carlos Coronel and Steven Morris, Carlos Coronel; Steven Morris, Steven Morris; Carlos CoronelPublisher:Cengage LearningA Guide to SQLComputer ScienceISBN:9781111527273Author:Philip J. PrattPublisher:Course Technology Ptr
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305627482/9781305627482_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781285196145/9781285196145_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781111527273/9781111527273_smallCoverImage.gif)