To think critically about: Whether plaintiff should pay damages or not. Introduction: Tort is an action that causes damage to someone or something. An action is considered tort if that act is wrongful.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter A, Problem 1CT

Summary Introduction

To think critically about: Whether plaintiff should pay damages or not.

Introduction:

Tort is an action that causes damage to someone or something. An action is considered tort if that act is wrongful.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Plaintiff should only pay the damages if the accusation made by him is frivolous or fabricated and it become obvious during the legal proceedings that the accusation made by plaintiff is frivolous. Plaintiff should pay the damages to the defendant because the frivolous complaint had already cost the defendant time, money and goodwill in fighting this case.

If plaintiff loses the case because of lack of evidence, then plaintiff should not pay any damages. If the damages are levied even when it is not obvious that accusation is frivolous, then it will deter the other person to bring the accusation against other party in the court. It will hamper the system of justice.

Conclusion

Hence, the damages should be paid by plaintiff only when the complaint is frivolous.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

WSS is a water supply company that has many customers. All customers homes have water meters that have mechanical dials that turn to record the consumption of water. Most homes have their meters indoors. Customers have to provide WSS with regular readings of their meters in order to ensure that they are billed properly for their water consumption. Customers can log into their accounts online to input their reading, or they can telephone WSS' call centre to give an operator a reading. WSS has a policy that customers must allow an inspector to read the water meters at least once per year. This inspection has two purposes. The first is to ensure that the customer has not been consistently understating the figures in order to underpay for their water and the second is to ensure that the meter has not been tampered with in order to reduce the reading according to the dials. The meters are designed so that they are difficult to dismantle without causing obvious damage and they also have a…

Answer 2

Question

Chapter A, Problem 1CT

Summary Introduction

To think critically about: Whether plaintiff should pay damages or not.

Introduction:

Tort is an action that causes damage to someone or something. An action is considered tort if that act is wrongful.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Plaintiff should only pay the damages if the accusation made by him is frivolous or fabricated and it become obvious during the legal proceedings that the accusation made by plaintiff is frivolous. Plaintiff should pay the damages to the defendant because the frivolous complaint had already cost the defendant time, money and goodwill in fighting this case.

If plaintiff loses the case because of lack of evidence, then plaintiff should not pay any damages. If the damages are levied even when it is not obvious that accusation is frivolous, then it will deter the other person to bring the accusation against other party in the court. It will hamper the system of justice.

Conclusion

Hence, the damages should be paid by plaintiff only when the complaint is frivolous.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter A, Problem 1CT

Summary Introduction

To think critically about: Whether plaintiff should pay damages or not.

Introduction:

Tort is an action that causes damage to someone or something. An action is considered tort if that act is wrongful.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Plaintiff should only pay the damages if the accusation made by him is frivolous or fabricated and it become obvious during the legal proceedings that the accusation made by plaintiff is frivolous. Plaintiff should pay the damages to the defendant because the frivolous complaint had already cost the defendant time, money and goodwill in fighting this case.

If plaintiff loses the case because of lack of evidence, then plaintiff should not pay any damages. If the damages are levied even when it is not obvious that accusation is frivolous, then it will deter the other person to bring the accusation against other party in the court. It will hamper the system of justice.

Conclusion

Hence, the damages should be paid by plaintiff only when the complaint is frivolous.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter A, Problem 1CT

Summary Introduction

To think critically about: Whether plaintiff should pay damages or not.

Introduction:

Tort is an action that causes damage to someone or something. An action is considered tort if that act is wrongful.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Plaintiff should only pay the damages if the accusation made by him is frivolous or fabricated and it become obvious during the legal proceedings that the accusation made by plaintiff is frivolous. Plaintiff should pay the damages to the defendant because the frivolous complaint had already cost the defendant time, money and goodwill in fighting this case.

If plaintiff loses the case because of lack of evidence, then plaintiff should not pay any damages. If the damages are levied even when it is not obvious that accusation is frivolous, then it will deter the other person to bring the accusation against other party in the court. It will hamper the system of justice.

Conclusion

Hence, the damages should be paid by plaintiff only when the complaint is frivolous.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter A, Problem 1CT

Summary Introduction

To think critically about: Whether plaintiff should pay damages or not.

Introduction:

Tort is an action that causes damage to someone or something. An action is considered tort if that act is wrongful.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Plaintiff should only pay the damages if the accusation made by him is frivolous or fabricated and it become obvious during the legal proceedings that the accusation made by plaintiff is frivolous. Plaintiff should pay the damages to the defendant because the frivolous complaint had already cost the defendant time, money and goodwill in fighting this case.

If plaintiff loses the case because of lack of evidence, then plaintiff should not pay any damages. If the damages are levied even when it is not obvious that accusation is frivolous, then it will deter the other person to bring the accusation against other party in the court. It will hamper the system of justice.

Conclusion

Hence, the damages should be paid by plaintiff only when the complaint is frivolous.

Answer 6

Chapter A, Problem 1CT

Summary Introduction

To think critically about: Whether plaintiff should pay damages or not.

Introduction:

Tort is an action that causes damage to someone or something. An action is considered tort if that act is wrongful.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Plaintiff should only pay the damages if the accusation made by him is frivolous or fabricated and it become obvious during the legal proceedings that the accusation made by plaintiff is frivolous. Plaintiff should pay the damages to the defendant because the frivolous complaint had already cost the defendant time, money and goodwill in fighting this case.

If plaintiff loses the case because of lack of evidence, then plaintiff should not pay any damages. If the damages are levied even when it is not obvious that accusation is frivolous, then it will deter the other person to bring the accusation against other party in the court. It will hamper the system of justice.

Conclusion

Hence, the damages should be paid by plaintiff only when the complaint is frivolous.

Answer 7

Chapter A, Problem 1CT

Summary Introduction

To think critically about: Whether plaintiff should pay damages or not.

Introduction:

Tort is an action that causes damage to someone or something. An action is considered tort if that act is wrongful.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Plaintiff should only pay the damages if the accusation made by him is frivolous or fabricated and it become obvious during the legal proceedings that the accusation made by plaintiff is frivolous. Plaintiff should pay the damages to the defendant because the frivolous complaint had already cost the defendant time, money and goodwill in fighting this case.

If plaintiff loses the case because of lack of evidence, then plaintiff should not pay any damages. If the damages are levied even when it is not obvious that accusation is frivolous, then it will deter the other person to bring the accusation against other party in the court. It will hamper the system of justice.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Conclusion

Hence, the damages should be paid by plaintiff only when the complaint is frivolous.

Answer 12

Ch. A.1 - Prob. A.1AQ Ch. A.1 - Prob. 1TP Ch. A.1 - Prob. 2TP Ch. A.1 - Prob. 3TP Ch. A.3 - Prob. 4TP Ch. A.3 - Prob. 5TP Ch. A.3 - Prob. 6TP Ch. A.3 - Prob. 7TP Ch. A.4 - Prob. A.4AQ Ch. A.5 - Prob. 8TP

To think critically about: Whether plaintiff should pay damages or not. Introduction: Tort is an action that causes damage to someone or something. An action is considered tort if that act is wrongful.

Solution Summary: The author explains that plaintiff should only pay damages if the accusation made by him is frivolous or fabricated. If plaintiff loses the case because of lack of evidence, he should not pay any damages.

To think critically about: Whether plaintiff should pay damages or not.

Introduction:

Tort is an action that causes damage to someone or something. An action is considered tort if that act is wrongful.

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter A Solutions