a.
Interpretation:
The company that has the lowest bid and the total cost of that bid.
Concept Introduction:
Under linear averaging method score of each tender will be result of sum of individual score in each category multiplied by corresponding category weight.
a.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
A tender invitation for a consulting project was sent and four companies have done the bidding as below-
Junior consultant hourly rate ($) | Hours provided by junior consultants (hr) | Senior consultant hourly rate ($) | Hours provided by senior consultants (hr) | |
Company A | 150 | 10 | ||
Company B | 250 | 6 | ||
Company C | 300 | 2 | ||
Company D | 200 | 4 |
Based on the bid provided four companies, total cost for all consulting hours is calculated as below-
Junior consultant hourly rate ($) | Hours provided by junior consultants (hr) | Senior consultant hourly rate ($) | Hours provided by senior consultants (hr) | Total bid cost($) | |
Company A | 150 | 10 | |||
Company B | 250 | 6 | |||
Company C | 300 | 2 | |||
Company D | 200 | 4 |
Thus it is clear that the lowest bid is from company C and the bid amount is
b.
Interpretation:
The company that will take the fewest hours to complete the work and the hours is may take.
Concept Introduction:
Under linear averaging method score of each tender will be result of sum of individual score in each category multiplied by corresponding category weight.
b.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
A tender invitation for a consulting project was sent and four companies have done the bidding as below-
Junior consultant hourly rate ($) | Hours provided by junior consultants (hr) | Senior consultant hourly rate ($) | Hours provided by senior consultants (hr) | |
Company A | 150 | 10 | ||
Company B | 250 | 6 | ||
Company C | 300 | 2 | ||
Company D | 200 | 4 |
Based on the bid provided four companies, total consulting hours is calculated as below-
Junior consultant hourly rate ($) | Hours provided by junior consultants (hr) | Senior consultant hourly rate ($) | Hours provided by senior consultants (hr) | Total consulting hours | |
Company A | 150 | 10 | |||
Company B | 250 | 6 | |||
Company C | 300 | 2 | |||
Company D | 200 | 4 |
Thus it is clear that the company A will take least time of
c.
Interpretation:
Price score and quality score of the bid based on stated specification.
Concept Introduction:
Under linear averaging method score of each tender will be result of sum of individual score in each category multiplied by corresponding category weight.
c.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
A tender invitation for a consulting project was sent and four companies have done the bidding as below-
Junior consultant hourly rate ($) | Hours provided by junior consultants (hr) | Senior consultant hourly rate ($) | Hours provided by senior consultants (hr) | |
Company A | 150 | 10 | ||
Company B | 250 | 6 | ||
Company C | 300 | 2 | ||
Company D | 200 | 4 |
For calculation of price score, each company is awarded
For calculation of quality score, the proportion of hours provided by senior consultant is multiplied by
Based on the bid provided four companies, total cost for all consulting hours is calculated as below-
Junior consultant hourly rate ($) | Hours provided by junior consultants (hr) | Senior consultant hourly rate ($) | Hours provided by senior consultants (hr) | Total bid cost($) | |
Company A | 150 | 10 | |||
Company B | 250 | 6 | |||
Company C | 300 | 2 | |||
Company D | 200 | 4 |
Thus it is clear that the lowest bid is from company C and the bid amount is
For calculation of price score, each company is awarded
Total bid cost($) | Difference with lowest bid($) | Penalty for price score | Price score | |
Company A | ||||
Company B | ||||
Company C | ||||
Company D |
For calculation of quality score, the proportion of hours provided by senior consultant is multiplied by
Hours provided by junior consultants (hr) | Hours provided by senior consultants (hr) | Proportion of hours provided by senior consultant | Quality score | |
Company A | 10 | |||
Company B | 6 | |||
Company C | 2 | |||
Company D | 4 |
Hence company B has worst price score of
d.
Interpretation:
The company that would win the bid based
Concept Introduction:
Under linear averaging method score of each tender will be result of sum of individual score in each category multiplied by corresponding category weight.
d.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
A tender invitation for a consulting project was sent and four companies have done the bidding as below-
Junior consultant hourly rate ($) | Hours provided by junior consultants (hr) | Senior consultant hourly rate ($) | Hours provided by senior consultants (hr) | |
Company A | 150 | 10 | ||
Company B | 250 | 6 | ||
Company C | 300 | 2 | ||
Company D | 200 | 4 |
For calculation of price score, each company is awarded
For calculation of quality score, the proportion of hours provided by senior consultant is multiplied by
For finalizing the contract
Price score | Quality score | Weighted average score | |
Company A | |||
Company B | |||
Company C | |||
Company D |
Hence, company A has highest weighted average score and should be awarded with the contract.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 9 Solutions
Practical Operations Management
- i). Complete the table assuming a Level production plan. ii) Comment on your results and explain whether at this stage, you consider a Level plan is a suitable approach for this particular business. Your comment should include reference to a calculated ‘fill rate’.arrow_forwardIn the following sawtooth inventory profile diagram, two inventory plans with different order quantities (Q) and different frequencies of delivery are shown; order quantity for Plan A = 200 units and Plan B = 50 units. i). Total demand (D) is 350 units, the holding cost per unit (Ch) is equal to (£0.8) and the ordering cost per order (Co) is (£12.5). Calculate the total costs for each plan and state which one is more preferable along with the reason why. ii). There is a stark difference in the composition of the total costs of Plans A and B. Explain this difference and why it occurs. Use the breakdown of costs for each plan to help illustrate your answer.arrow_forwardi). Complete the table for a Chase production plan. ii). Explain whether a Level or Chase plan is more suitable for the demand pattern experienced by this particular business, which incidentally relies on highly skilled workers in the production process. Assume a starting workforce of 7 and that fractional workers are permissible. You should support your answer with numerical data derived from Table 3. In comparing the costs, state any other assumptions made.arrow_forward
- i). Complete for a Chase production plan. ii). Explain whether a Level or Chase plan is more suitable for the demand pattern experienced by this particular business, which incidentally relies on highly skilled workers in the production process. Assume a starting workforce of 7 and that fractional workers are permissible.arrow_forwardComplete the table for a Chase production plan.arrow_forwardHow much can the garden centre expect to sell during each quarter of next year (Year 3) accounting for seasonality? Your forecast must make use of seasonal indices. All workings must be shown in full. (NOTE: Please round your calculations to three decimal places).arrow_forward
- PS.53 Brother I.D. Ricks is a faculty member at BYU-Idaho whose grandchildren live in Oklahoma and California. He and his wife would like to visit their grandchildren at least once a year in these states. They currently have one vehicle with well over 100,000 miles on it, so they want to buy a newer vehicle with fewer miles and that gets better gas mileage. They are considering two options: (1) a new subcompact car that would cost $18,750 to purchase or (2) a used sedan that would cost $12,750.They anticipate that the new subcompact would get 37 miles per gallon (combined highway and around town driving) while the sedan would get 26 miles per gallon. Based on their road tripping history they expect to drive 13,000 miles per year. For the purposes of their analysis they are assuming that gas will cost $2.93 per gallon.Question: How many miles would the Ricks need to drive before the cost of these two options would be the same? (Display your answer to the nearest whole number.) (Hint:…arrow_forwardTisjTzktxyduduarrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- Not use ai pleasearrow_forwardWhat is Bitcoin? How important is it to businesses and individuals? How does it cause environmental damage and is that damage worth continued uses of Bitcoin? Read the following articles to help answer these questions: United Nations University. (2023, October 24). UN study reveals the hidden environmental impacts of bitcoin: Carbon is not the only harmful by-product. https://unu.edu/press-release/un-study-reveals-hidden-environmental-impacts-bitcoin-carbon-not-only-harmful-product#:~:text=Bitcoin%2C%20the%20most%20popular%20cryptocurrency,the%20worldwide%20Bitcoin%20mining%20network. Salam, E. (2023, April 26). Bitcoin is terrible for the environment – can it ever go green? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/apr/26/bitcoin-mining-climate-crisis-environmental-impactarrow_forward419 X .com/courses/1546/assignments/49499?module_item_id=111573 Unlimited Attempts Allowed ✓ Details Directions: Record a video of yourself giving a business presentation. Imagine you are tasked with researching a professional development topic on business communication for 40 coworkers. You are then expected to give a 4 - 5 minute presentation on the topic. Choose any topic related to business communication, such as intercultural communication, effective leadership, professional writing, etc. Research the topic and prepare a 4 - 5 minute presentation that could be given over video conference call (such as Zoom). You may use visual aids if you choose. Upload a video file of your presentation. Provide all needed citations. Requirements: 4-5 minutes long Contains visual and audio Create your own work; do not plagiarize Cite your sources using APA citations Choose a submission type Tarrow_forward
- Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage LearningMarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033791Author:Pride, William MPublisher:South Western Educational PublishingPractical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,