Concept explainers
Project Analysis. You are considering a new product launch. The project will cost $780,000, have a four-year life, and have no salvage value;
a. Based on your experience, you think the unit sales, variable cost, and fixed cost projections given here are probably accurate to within ±10 percent. What are the best and worst cases for these projections? What is the base-case
b. Evaluate the sensitivity of your base-case NPV to changes in fixed costs.
a)
To calculate: The best and the worst case of the net present value.
Introduction:
The process of analyzing the future proceedings compared to the figures of the net present value is scenario analysis. A project often experiences the best and the worst case of scenarios.
Answer to Problem 23QP
The best case of the net present value is $980,214.89 and the worst case of the net present value is -$418,874.44.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
A project with 4-year life is being evaluated, the cost of the project is $780,000 and it has no salvage value. The depreciation is assumed to be a straight-line to zero over the project’s life. The projected sales is 180 units for one year.
The price for a unit is $16,300, the fixed cost for a year is $535,000, and the variable cost for a unit is $11,100. The rate of tax is 35% and the required return is 11%. The projections for the quantity, price, variable cost, and fixed costs are within 11%. The rate of tax is 35%.
Scenario | Unit sales | Variable cost | Fixed costs |
Base | 180 | $11,100 | $535,000 |
Best | 198 | $9,990 | $481,500 |
Worst | 162 | $12,120 | $588,500 |
Formula to calculate the operating cash flow using the tax shield approach:
Here,
Computation of the base case of the operating cash flow:
Hence, the base case of the operating cash flow is $328,900.
Formula to calculate the net present value:
Note: As there are many years, PVIFA is used. PVIFA is the present value interest factor of annuity.
Computation of the base case of the net present value:
Hence, the base case of the net present value is $240,379.36.
Computation of the worst case of the operating cash flow:
Hence, the worst case of the operating cash flow is $116,402.
Computation of the worst case of the net present value:
Hence, the worst case of the net present value is -$418,874.44.
Formula to calculate the operating cash flow using the tax shield approach:
Here,
Computation of the best case of the operating cash flow:
Hence, the best case of the operating cash flow is $567,372.
Formula to calculate the net present value:
Computation of the best case of the net present value:
Hence, the best case of the net present value is $980,214.89.
b)
To evaluate: The sensitivity of the base-case net present value to the changes in fixed costs.
Introduction:
The process of analyzing the future proceedings compared to the figures of the net present value is scenario analysis. A project often experiences the best and the worst case of scenarios.
Answer to Problem 23QP
For each dollar, the fixed costs will increase and the NPV declines by $2.02.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
A project with 4-year life is being evaluated, the cost of the project is $780,000 and it has no salvage value. The depreciation is assumed to be a straight-line to zero over the project’s life. The projected sales is 180 units for one year.
The price for a unit is $16,300, the fixed cost for a year is $535,000, and the variable cost for a unit is $11,100. The rate of tax is 35% and the required return is 11%. The projections for the quantity, price, variable cost, and fixed costs are within 11%. The rate of tax is 35%.
Note: To find the sensitivity of the net present value to the changes in fixed costs, other level of fixed costs is chosen. The chosen fixed cost is $545,000.
Formula to calculate the operating cash flow using the tax shield approach:
Here,
Computation of the operating cash flow:
Hence, the operating cash flow is $322,400.
Formula to calculate the net present value:
Computation the net present value:
Hence, the net present value is $220,213.76.
Formula to compute the sensitivity of net present value to the changes in fixed costs:
Compute the sensitivity of net present value to the changes in fixed costs:
Hence, the sensitivity of the NPV to the changes in fixed costs is -$2.02.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 9 Solutions
Essentials of Corporate Finance (Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series in Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate)
- Roberts Company is considering an investment in equipment that is capable of producing more efficiently than the current technology. The outlay required is 2,293,200. The equipment is expected to last five years and will have no salvage value. The expected cash flows associated with the project are as follows: Required: 1. Compute the projects payback period. 2. Compute the projects accounting rate of return. 3. Compute the projects net present value, assuming a required rate of return of 10 percent. 4. Compute the projects internal rate of return.arrow_forwardGina Ripley, president of Dearing Company, is considering the purchase of a computer-aided manufacturing system. The annual net cash benefits and savings associated with the system are described as follows: The system will cost 9,000,000 and last 10 years. The companys cost of capital is 12 percent. Required: 1. Calculate the payback period for the system. Assume that the company has a policy of only accepting projects with a payback of five years or less. Would the system be acquired? 2. Calculate the NPV and IRR for the project. Should the system be purchasedeven if it does not meet the payback criterion? 3. The project manager reviewed the projected cash flows and pointed out that two items had been missed. First, the system would have a salvage value, net of any tax effects, of 1,000,000 at the end of 10 years. Second, the increased quality and delivery performance would allow the company to increase its market share by 20 percent. This would produce an additional annual net benefit of 300,000. Recalculate the payback period, NPV, and IRR given this new information. (For the IRR computation, initially ignore salvage value.) Does the decision change? Suppose that the salvage value is only half what is projected. Does this make a difference in the outcome? Does salvage value have any real bearing on the companys decision?arrow_forwardMarkoff Products is considering two competing projects, but only one will be selected. Project A requires an initial investment of $42,000 and is expected to generate future cash flows of $6,000 for each of the next 50 years. Project B requires an initial investment of $210,000 and will generate $30,000 for each of the next 10 years. If Markoff requires a payback of 8 years or less, which project should it select based on payback periods?arrow_forward
- Friedman Company is considering installing a new IT system. The cost of the new system is estimated to be 2,250,000, but it would produce after-tax savings of 450,000 per year in labor costs. The estimated life of the new system is 10 years, with no salvage value expected. Intrigued by the possibility of saving 450,000 per year and having a more reliable information system, the president of Friedman has asked for an analysis of the projects economic viability. All capital projects are required to earn at least the firms cost of capital, which is 12 percent. Required: 1. Calculate the projects internal rate of return. Should the company acquire the new IT system? 2. Suppose that savings are less than claimed. Calculate the minimum annual cash savings that must be realized for the project to earn a rate equal to the firms cost of capital. Comment on the safety margin that exists, if any. 3. Suppose that the life of the IT system is overestimated by two years. Repeat Requirements 1 and 2 under this assumption. Comment on the usefulness of this information.arrow_forwardJasmine Manufacturing is considering a project that will require an initial investment of $52,000 and is expected to generate future cash flows of $10,000 for years 1 through 3, $8,000 for years 4 and 5, and $2,000 for years 6 through 10. What is the payback period for this project?arrow_forwardes You are considering a new product launch. The project will cost $2,225,000, have a four- year life, and have no salvage value; depreciation is straight-line to zero. Sales are projected at 280 units per year; price per unit will be $19,700, variable cost per unit will be $13,250, and fixed costs will be $670,000 per year. The required return on the project is 12 percent, and the relevant tax rate is 21 percent. a. Based on your experience, you think the unit sales, variable cost, and fixed cost projections given here are probably accurate to within ±10 percent. What are the upper and lower bounds for these projections? What is the base-case NPV? What are the best-case and worst-case scenarios? (A negative answer should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your NPV answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16. Round your other answers to the nearest whole number, e.g. 32.) Scenario Unit Sales Variable Cost Fixed Costs NPV Base 280 $ 13,250 $ 670,000…arrow_forward
- You are considering a new product launch. The project will cost $2,350,000, have a fouryear life, and have no salvage value; depreciation is straight-line to zero. Sales are projected at 330 units per year; price per unit will be $19,600, variable cost per unit will be $14,000, and fixed costs will be $720,000 per year. The required return on the project is 10 percent, and the relevant tax rate is 21 percent. a. Based on your experience, you think the unit sales, variable cost, and fixed cost projections given here are probably accurate to within +-10 percent. What are the upper and lower bounds for these projections? What is the base-case NPV? What are the best-case and worst-case scenarios? (A negative answer should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your NPV answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16. Round your other answers to the nearest whole number, e.g. 32.) \table[[Scenario,Unit Sales,Variable Cost,Fixed…arrow_forwardYou are considering a new product launch. The project will cost $750,000, have a 4-year life, and have no salvage value; depreciation is straight-line to zero. Sales are projected at 440 units per year; price per unit will be $17,700, variable cost per unit will be $14,400, and fixed costs will be $725,000 per year. The required return on the project is 12 percent, and the relevant tax rate is 23 percent. a. The unit sales, variable cost, and fixed cost projections given above are probably accurate to within ±10 percent. What are the upper and lower bounds for these projections?arrow_forwardYou are considering a new product launch. The project will cost $960,000, have a 5-year life, and have no salvage value; depreciation is straight-line to zero. Sales are projected at 350 units per year; price per unit will be $15,955, variable cost per unit will be $12,000, and fixed costs will be $625,000 per year. The required return on the project is 10 percent, and the relevant tax rate is 23 percent. Based on your experience, you think the unit sales, variable cost, and fixed cost projections given here are probably accurate to within +10 percent. a. What are the best-case and worst-case NPVs with these projections? Note: A negative answer should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16. b. What is the base-case NPV? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16. c. What is the sensitivity of your base-case NPV to changes in fixed costs? Note: A…arrow_forward
- You are considering a new product launch. The project will cost $900,000, have a 4-year life, and have no salvage value; depreciation is straight-line to zero. Sales are projected at 560 units per year; price per unit will be $19,200, variable cost per unit will be $15,900, and fixed costs will be $950,000 per year. The required return on the project is 12 percent, and the relevant tax rate is 23 percent. a. The unit sales, variable cost, and fixed cost projections given above are probably accurate to within ±10 percent. What are the upper and lower bounds for these projections? What is the base-case NPV? What are the best-case and worst-case scenarios? (A negative amount should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations and round your NPV answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) Scenario Unit sales Variable cost per unit Fixed costs Scenario Base-case Best-case Worst-case Upper bound NPV Lower bound unitsarrow_forwardYou are considering a new product launch. The project will cost $1.675 million, have a four-year life, and have no salvage value; depreciation is straight-line to zero. Sales are projected at 195 units per year; price per unit will be $16,300; variable cost per unit will be $9,400; and fixed costs will be $550,000 per year. The required return on the project is 12 percent and the relevant tax rate is 21 percent. a. Based on your experience, you think the unit sales, variable cost, and fixed cost projections given above are probably accurate to within ±10 percent. What are the upper and lower bounds for these projections? What is the base-case NPV? What are the best-case and worst-case scenarios? (A negative answer should be Indicated by a minus sign. Do not round Intermediate calculations and round your NPV answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) Scenario Upper bound Lower bound Unit sales 214 175 units Variable cost per unit $ 10,340 $ 8,480 Fixed costs $ 605,000 $ 495,000 Scenario…arrow_forwardYou are considering a new product launch. The project will cost $830,000, have a 4-year life, and have no salvage value; depreciation is straight-line to zero. Sales are projected at 470 units per year, price per unit will be $18,500, variable cost per unit will be $15,200, and fixed costs will be $845,000 per year. The required return on the project is 10 percent, and the relevant tax rate is 21 percent. a. The unit sales, variable cost, and fixed cost projections given above are probably accurate to within ±10 percent. What are the upper and lower bounds for these projections? What is the base-case NPV? What are the best-case and worst-case scenarios? (A negative amount should be indicated by a minus sign. Do not round intermediate calculations and round your NPV answers to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) Upper bound Lower bound Unit sales 517 423 Variable cost per unit $ 16,720 $ 13,680 Fixed costs $ 929,500 $ 760,500 Base-case $ 1,076,088.00 Best-case $ 3,643,988.00 Worst-case $…arrow_forward
- Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Accounting Volume 2AccountingISBN:9781947172609Author:OpenStaxPublisher:OpenStax CollegeIntermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course...FinanceISBN:9781337395083Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. DavesPublisher:Cengage Learning