OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT >C<
14th Edition
ISBN: 9781307701432
Author: Stevenson
Publisher: MCG/CREATE
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 8, Problem 6DRQ
Summary Introduction
To define: Factor rating and determine the framework of factor rating.
Introduction:
It is a method to assess different options in through various indicated factors. It enables heads to incorporate subjective data and measureable data while giving a levelheaded premise of correlation through factor rating by setting up an incentive for every alternative that includes all variables.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Explain The Factor-Rating Method?
what is the importance of ultimate zone rating in baseball
AHP
Chapter 8 Solutions
OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT >C<
Ch. 8.3 - Prob. 1RQCh. 8.3 - Prob. 2RQCh. 8.3 - Prob. 3RQCh. 8 - Prob. 1DRQCh. 8 - Prob. 2DRQCh. 8 - Prob. 3DRQCh. 8 - Prob. 4DRQCh. 8 - Prob. 5DRQCh. 8 - Prob. 6DRQCh. 8 - Prob. 7DRQ
Ch. 8 - Prob. 8DRQCh. 8 - Prob. 9DRQCh. 8 - Prob. 1TSCh. 8 - Prob. 2TSCh. 8 - Prob. 3TSCh. 8 - Prob. 1CTECh. 8 - Prob. 2CTECh. 8 - Prob. 3CTECh. 8 - Prob. 4CTECh. 8 - Prob. 1PCh. 8 - Prob. 2PCh. 8 - Prob. 3PCh. 8 - Prob. 4PCh. 8 - Prob. 5PCh. 8 - Prob. 6PCh. 8 - Prob. 7PCh. 8 - Prob. 8PCh. 8 - Prob. 9PCh. 8 - Prob. 10PCh. 8 - Prob. 11PCh. 8 - Prob. 12PCh. 8 - Prob. 13PCh. 8 - Prob. 14PCh. 8 - Prob. 15PCh. 8 - Prob. 1CQ
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?arrow_forward
- Voice International is deciding between 2 Philippine companies to provide its call center services. A factor-rating method is used to evaluate. The factors are rated on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best score. If the factors are weighted equally with respective weights of .3333, which of the firm is preferred? FIRM FACTOR 1 FACTOR 2 FACTOR 3 A 6 7 10 B 8 9 8arrow_forwardWhat are the considerations in planning for location, facilities and capacity?arrow_forwardThe Zhao family of Atlanta, Georgia, is planning its annual summer vacation. Three vacation locations along with criteria weights and location ratings follow. What is the recommended vacation location? Criteria Travel distance Vacation Entertainment available Outdoor activities Unique experience Family fun O Myrtle Beach, South Carolina OSmoky Mountains Branson, Missouri Weight 2 5 3 2 4 5 Myrtle Beach, South Carolina 5 5 7 9 5 8 Ratings Smoky Mountains 9 6 4 6 9 9 Branson, Missouri 3 8 4 5 9 8arrow_forward
- sniparrow_forwardWhat is a Locational break-even analysis?arrow_forwardMetro has initiated discussions on attracting rail service. A depot would need to be constructed, which would require $2.5million in land and $7.5 million in construction costs. Annual operating and maintenance costs (O&M) for the facility would be $150,000, and personnel costs would be an additional $110,000. Other assorted costs would be born by the railroad and federal authorities. Annual benefits (B) of the rail service are estimated as listed: $120,000 for Railroad annual payments, $25,000 for Rail tax charged to passengers, $20,000 for Convenience benefits to local residents, and $12,000 for Additional tourism dollars for Metro. Apply the B-C ratio method, with a MARR of 8% per year and 20 year study period, to determine if the rail service should be established. a. BC ratio=2.12, good project b. BC ratio=-1.76, good project c. BC ratio=1.69, good project d. BC ratio=0.14, not good projectarrow_forward
- The piece of land available is situated on the main road through the area and has great views of MountKinabalu on one side and the valley below on the other side. As the strategic advisor you have been asked to come up with a recommendation whether to develop a 4-star or 5-star property. Due to the fact that the area is near a World Heritage site and due to building height restrictions the total number of rooms for a 4-star hotel would be 300 rooms, whilst for a 5-star property the number of rooms would be 190. Identify at least THREE (3) strengths and weaknesses each and at least TWO (2) opportunities and threats each for the proposed hotel/resort at that area. (Not for Mount Kinabalu as a tourist attraction!)arrow_forwardsniparrow_forwardAmazon had planned to open a second headquarters in Brooklyn that would have allegedly added 25,000 jobs to the region, increased property values, generated more business for local store owners, and generated additional sales and income tax revenue for the government. Some people were concerned, however, that increased home prices could lead to higher rent for people who rented apartments in Brooklyn. Which of the following statements are true? O Allowing Amazon to locate its second headquarters in Brooklyn is a Pareto improvement (i.e., makes one or more persons better off without making anyone worse off) even if some renters will have to pay higher rent. O Allowing Amazon to locate its second headquarters in Brooklyn would not be Kaldor-Hicks efficient if some renters will have to pay higher rent. O Allowing Amazon to locate its second headquarters in Brooklyn is a Kaldor-Hicks improvement if the gain in jobs and tax revenue more than offsets any losses experienced by renters. O…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning