Bundle: Essentials Of Economics, Loose-leaf Version, 8th + Lms Integrated Mindtap Economics, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card
8th Edition
ISBN: 9781337368087
Author: N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 8, Problem 5PA
To determine
The pros and cons of taxing food to raise tax revenue.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
Suppose the price elasticity of demand for smartphones is 0.5 (absolute value), while the price elasticity of supply is 1.9. If the government imposes a per-unit tax of $100 on the sellers of smartphones, how will the price and quantity transacted of smartphones change? Will the sellers or the buyers bear a larger tax burden? Will the market be able to achieve economic efficiency after the tax is imposed? Explain with a diagram.
After economics class one day, your friend suggests that taxing food would be a good way to raise revenue because the demand for food is quite inelastic. In what sense is taxing food a “good” way to raise revenue? In what sense is it not a “good” way to raise revenue?
why do comsumers pay the tax on goods if the elasticity of demand is less than the elasticty of supply?
Chapter 8 Solutions
Bundle: Essentials Of Economics, Loose-leaf Version, 8th + Lms Integrated Mindtap Economics, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose the supply curve for cars is more elastic than the demand curve for cars. If the government imposes a tax on car sellers, which party (buyers or sellers) will bear more of the tax burden? How will the tax burden change if the government imposed the tax on car buyers, rather than sellers?arrow_forwardWe discussed rent control in class this semester. When there is rent control in the market for housing, we expect the supply of rental housing to be more elastic in the long run than in the short run. Which of the following is true based on the above statement about rent control and the supply of rental housing? a. In the short run, there will be a large deadweight loss from rent control. However, the deadweight loss becomes smaller in the long run. b. The supply is inelastic in the short run because it is difficult to build lots of new housing units in a small amount of time. c. Rent control is never binding. d. The number of rental housing decreases in the short run but increases in the long run. e. None of the above.arrow_forwardConsider the market for BP gasoline. If the market has a very elastic supply and a very inelastic demand, how would the burden of a tax on BP gasoline be shared between producers and consumers? Draw a graph to support your answer.arrow_forward
- The government needs to raise revenue to subsidize the vegetable industry and wants to do so by taxing the fruit industry. Four fruit markets are summarized below. Fruit Markets Apple Banana Cherry Durian Demand P= 163-0.9Q P = 163-2.7Q P=163-3.1Q P = 163-2.7Q Supply P=6+0.8Q P=6+0.8Q P=6+4.2Q P=6+4.20 If the government imposes a $9.9 per fruit tax on one of these markets, what's the most it could earn? a. $211.06 b. $251.08 c. $856.64 d. $416.08arrow_forwardthe demand for beer is more elastic than the demand for milk. would a tax on beer or a tax on milk have a larger deadweight loss? why?arrow_forwardDaniel Patrick Moynihan, the late senator from New York, once introduced a bill that would levy a 10,000 percent tax on certain hollow-tipped bullets. A 10,000 percent tax on bullet ___ is not/is___ likely to generate a lot of revenue. Why might Senator Moynihan have proposed it? To boost the manufacturing industry of hollow-tipped bulletsTo raise revenue to support law enforcementTo discourage the use of hollow-tipped bulletsarrow_forward
- 35-37. The market for widgets has the following supply and demand curves: Supply: P = 10 + (1/3)Q Demand: P = 100 – (1/2)Q Initially, the market is in equilibrium at P = $46, Q = 108. Questions 35 through 37 concern this market. 35. Suppose the government opens the border to free trade in widgets and foreign suppliers have a perfectly elastic supply at a price of $40 per unit. As a result the dollar value of widget imports is: A) $0 B) $40 C) $3600 D) $4800 E) $1380 F) $1200 G) $5520 H) $4140 I) $2400 J) none of the above 36. As a result of trade (rounded to the nearest dollar) the gain to society has changed by: A) -$684 B) +$684 C) -$594 D) +$594 E) -$90 F) +$90 G) -$1278 H) +$1278 I) $0 J) None of the above 37. Suppose a new study comes out that identifies widgets as a source of a health hazard, exposure to them causes cancer. The study estimates that the total global external cost of widget production and consumption is given by the following expression: Now determine (rounded to…arrow_forwardSuppose the market for cigarette is competitive. An economist estimates the price elasticity of demand and supply for cigarette are -0.8 and 0.7 respectively. Suppose the government imposes a per-unit tax of $45 Some economists believe that a sales tax, in general, is undesirable. Explain. Despite this, why do most countries still impose a tax on cigarette? Explain plausible arguments.arrow_forwardWith the help of appropriate diagrams, explain how a tax can be used to reduce the consumption of a harmful product such as cigarettes.arrow_forward
- Please answer these two questions using the information from above: The government wants to increase production of this good. Would it make more sense to offer a subsidy or a tax? Based on your previous answers, would the government plan to increase production be likely to be effective or ineffective? Explain your answer.arrow_forwardIf the government imposes a tax of 8% on luxury cars that the consumer must pay, why does the consumer not actually pay the full 8%? How is it determined how much the consumer will pay and how much the producer will pay? Is it possible for an 8% tax the government imposes on the consumer to actually have 1% paid by the consumer and 7% by the producer? Why or why not?arrow_forwardAt the current market equilibrium, the price elasticity of supply for a certain good is much lower than the price elasticity of demand. if the government imposes a $5 specific tax on this good, who will bear more of the burden of the tax?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337091992
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning