Concept explainers
a)
To determine: The monthly volume at each location.
Introduction: Location is where a firm chooses to site its operations. Location decisions can large effects on expenses and incomes. Location choices are normally quite imperative to both substantial and private companies. The area choice directly affects an operation's expenses and also its capacity to serve clients.
a)
Answer to Problem 2P
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
It is given that the labor and material costs are $1.76 per sandwich, the cost of sandwich is $2.65. The rent and equipment cost for Location A is$5,000, Location B is $5,500 and Location C is $5,800. The realized monthly profit is $10,000
Calculate the monthly volume at each location
It is calculated by adding realized profit with fixed costs and dividing the result with rate per unit subtracted by variable costs.
Hence, the monthly volume of location A is 16,853.93 units, location B is 17,415.73 units and location C is 17,752.81 units.
b)
To determine: The location that yield with greatest profits.
Introduction: Location is where a firm chooses to site its operations. Location decisions can large effects on expenses and incomes. Location choices are normally quite imperative to both substantial and private companies. The area choice directly affects an operation's expenses and also its capacity to serve clients.
b)
Answer to Problem 2P
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
It is given that the labor and material costs are $1.76 per sandwich, the cost of sandwich is $2.65. The rent and equipment cost for Location A is $5,000, Location B is $5,500 and Location C is $5,800. The expected sales for Location A are $21,000, Location B is $22,000 and Location C is $23,000.
Calculate the location that yield with greatest profits.
It is calculated by subtracting the rate per unit with variable costs and multiplying the result with expected sales and subtracting the whole with the fixed costs.
Hence, location C yields greatest profits.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 8 Solutions
Loose-leaf for Operations Management (The Mcgraw-hill Series in Operations and Decision Sciences)
- Please do not give solution in image format thankuarrow_forwardThe owner of Genuine Subs, Inc., hopes to expand the present operation by adding one new outlet.She has studied three locations. Each would have the same labor and materials costs (food, servingcontainers, napkins, etc.) of $1.78 cents per sandwich. Sandwiches sell for $2.43 each in all locations.Rent and equipment costs would be $5,000 per month for location A, $6,500 per month forlocation B, and $5,800 per month for location C.a. Determine the volume necessary at each location to realize a monthly profit of $10,000.b. If expected sales at A, B, and C are 22,000 per month, 21,000 per month, and 20,000 per month,respectively, which location would yield the greatest profits?arrow_forwardA small producer of machine tools wants to move to a larger building, and has identified two alternatives. Location A has annual fixed costs of $800,000 and variable costs of $14,000 per unit; location B has annual fixed costs of $920,000 and variable costs of $13,000 per unit. The finished items sell for $17,000 each.a. At what volume of output would the two locations have the same total cost?b. For what range of output would location A be superior? For what range would B be superior?arrow_forward
- OP i need all solution please help......arrow_forwardAmazon had planned to open a second headquarters in Brooklyn that would have allegedly added 25,000 jobs to the region, increased property values, generated more business for local store owners, and generated additional sales and income tax revenue for the government. Some people were concerned, however, that increased home prices could lead to higher rent for people who rented apartments in Brooklyn. Which of the following statements are true? O Allowing Amazon to locate its second headquarters in Brooklyn is a Pareto improvement (i.e., makes one or more persons better off without making anyone worse off) even if some renters will have to pay higher rent. O Allowing Amazon to locate its second headquarters in Brooklyn would not be Kaldor-Hicks efficient if some renters will have to pay higher rent. O Allowing Amazon to locate its second headquarters in Brooklyn is a Kaldor-Hicks improvement if the gain in jobs and tax revenue more than offsets any losses experienced by renters. O…arrow_forwardLocation A would result in annual fixed costs of $300,000 and variable costs of $55 per unit. Annual fixed costs at Location B are $600,000 with variable costs of $32 per unit. Sales volume is estimated to be 30,000 units per year. Which location has the lower cost at this volume? How large is its cost advantage? At what volume are the two facilities equal in cost?arrow_forward
- Requirement: Show your calculationarrow_forwardA small producer of machine tools wants to move to a larger building, and has identified two alternatives. Location A has annual fixed costs of $160,000 and variable costs of $15,000 per unit; location B has annual fixed costs of $360,000 and variable costs of $14,000 per unit. The finished items sell for $16,000 each. a. At what volume of output would the two locations have the same total cost? Volume of Output ____________unites b.1 For what range of output would location A be superior? (Enter your answer as a whole number. Do not include the indifference point in your answer.) Range of output 0 to ______________ b.2 For what range would B be superior? (Enter your answer as a whole number. Do not include the indifference point in your answer.) Range of output _________________or morearrow_forward1arrow_forward
- Please show the solution to the corresponding answer stated in the problem.arrow_forwardAn operations manager wants to use factor rating method to decide the location of a new restaurant. Weights of the three factors specified, and the scores of two options are shown in the table below. Which option should the operations manager choose and what is the weighted score of this option? Factor Weight Option 1 Score Option 2 Score Proximity to the University 0.5 90 80 Rental Cost 0.3 80 100 Size 0.2 70 70 Option 2, weighted score = 84 Option 2, weighted score = 83 Option 1, weighted score = 83 There is no difference between the two options Option 1, weighted score = 84arrow_forwardDawson Electronics is a manufacturer of high-tech control modules for lawn sprinkler systems. Denise, the CEO, is trying to decide if the company should develop one of the two potential new products, the Water Saver 1000 or the Greener Grass 5000. With each product, Dawson can capture a bigger market share if it chooses to expand capacity by buying additional machines. Given different demand scenarios, their probabilities of occurrence, and capacity expansion versus no change in capacity, the potential sale of each product are summarized in the included table. Click the icon to view the table. What is the expected payoff for the Water Saver 1000 and the Greener Grass 5000, with and without capacity expansion? The expected payoff for the Water Saver 1000 with the capacity expansion is $ integer.) The expected payoff for the Water Saver 1000 without the capacity expansion is $. (Enter your response as an integer.) ਗਿਆ (Enter your response as an The expected payoff for the Greener Grass…arrow_forward
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,Operations ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781259667473Author:William J StevensonPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationOperations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi...Operations ManagementISBN:9781259666100Author:F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B ChasePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
- Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage LearningProduction and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi...Operations ManagementISBN:9781478623069Author:Steven Nahmias, Tava Lennon OlsenPublisher:Waveland Press, Inc.