
a)
The Correctly labeled graph that shows the points from 0% to 100% of the population on the Lorenz curve before the redistribution of income.
a)

Explanation of Solution
Before the redistribution of income, the population included 100 households and income was 2 million who earn their share according to the proportion of poor from 0% to 100% which can be shown on the Lorenz curve as follows:
Here, 20% of the population earns 20% of the total income and 40% of the population earns 40% of the income and this income is in the same proportion up to 100%.
Introduction: Total income is the gross income of a country from all sources of revenue that subtract some deductions such as expenses and allowances.
The Lorenz curve shows the graphical representation of inequality in income and inequality in wealth which was developed by Max Lorenz.
b)
The correctly labeled graph that shows the points from 0% to 100% of the population on the Lorenz curve after the redistribution of income
b)

Explanation of Solution
After the redistribution of income, the population included 100 households and the total income was also the same which was 2 million. Here, people earn their share according to the proportion of poor from 0% to 100% which can be shown on the Lorenz curve as similar to the previous graph:
Here, 20% of the population earns 20% of the total income and 40% of the population earns 40% of the income and this income is in the same proportion up to 100%. The graph shows a similar proportion because there is no change in total income and the number of households after the redistribution of income.
Introduction: Total income is the gross income of a country from all sources of revenue that subtract some deductions such as expenses and allowances. The amount of income, where one group of the population earns income below that amount and one group earns above that amount refers to the median income. Whereas, mean income is the average income of the population.
The Lorenz curve shows the graphical representation of inequality in income and inequality in wealth which was developed by Max Lorenz.
c)
The Gini coefficient after the redistribution of income
c)

Explanation of Solution
In this case, the Gini coefficient would be zero because there is no gap between the Lorenz curve and the equality line. As all the members receive an equal proportion of income after the distribution which means there is no inequality of income distribution. It does not show any difference between the equality line and the Lorenz curve. Therefore, the Gini coefficient would be zero.
Introduction: Total income is the gross income of a country from all sources of revenue that subtract some deductions such as expenses and allowances.
The Lorenz curve shows the graphical representation of inequality in income and inequality in wealth which was developed by Max Lorenz.
The Gini coefficient refers to the measurement of the inequality among values of a frequency distribution which is developed by Corrado Gini and it covers the distribution of income and distribution of wealth such as the levels of income.
Chapter 78 Solutions
Krugman's Economics For The Ap® Course
- Problema 4 (20 puntos): Supongamos que tenemos un ingreso de $120 y enfrentamos los precios P₁ =6 y P₂ =4. Nuestra función de utilidad es: U(x1, x2) = x0.4x0.6 a) Planteen el problema de optimización y obtengan las condiciones de primer orden. b) Encuentren el consumo óptimo de x1 y x2. c) ¿Cómo cambiará nuestra elección óptima si el ingreso aumenta a $180?arrow_forwardPlease draw the graph for number 4 and 5, I appreciate it!!arrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- not use ai pleasearrow_forward• Prismatic Cards: A prismatic card will be a card that counts as having every suit. We will denote, e.g., a prismatic Queen card by Q*. With this notation, 2.3045 Q would be a double flush since every card is a diamond and a heart. • Wild Cards: A wild card counts as having every suit and every denomination. Denote wild cards with a W; if there are multiple, we will denote them W₁, W2, etc. With this notation, W2 20.30054 would be both a three-of-a-kind (three 2's) and a flush (5 diamonds). If we add multiple wild cards to the deck, they count as distinct cards, so that (e.g.) the following two hands count as "different hands" when counting: W15 5Q and W255◊♡♡♣♣ In addition, 1. Let's start with the unmodified double-suited deck. (a) Call a hand a flush house if it is a flush and a full house, i.e. if all cards share a suit and there are 3 cards of one denomination and two of another. For example, 550. house. How many different flush house hands are there? 2. Suppose we add one wild…arrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- In a classic oil-drilling example, you are trying to decide whether to drill for oil on a field that might or might not contain any oil. Before making this decision, you have the option of hiring a geologist to perform some seismic tests and then predict whether there is any oil or not. You assess that if there is actually oil, the geologist will predict there is oil with probability 0.85 . You also assess that if there is no oil, the geologist will predict there is no oil with probability 0.90. Please answer the two questions below, as I am trying to ensure that I am correct. 1. Why will these two probabilities not appear on the decision tree? 2. Which probabilities will be on the decision tree?arrow_forwardAsap pleasearrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- not use ai pleasearrow_forwardIn this question, you will test relative purchasing parity (PPP) using the data. Use yearly data from FRED website from 1971 to 2020: (i) The Canadian Dollars to U.S. Dollar Spot Exchange Rate (ER) (ii) Consumer price index for Canada (CAN_CPI), and (iii) Consumer price index for the US (US_CPI). Inflation is measured by the consumer price index (CPI). The relative PPP equation is: AE CAN$/US$ ECAN$/US$ = π CAN - πUS Submit the Excel sheet that you worked on. 1. First, compute the percentage change in the exchange rate (left-hand side of the equation). Caculate the variable for each year from 1972 to 2020 in Column E (named Change_ER) of the Excel sheet. For example, for 1972, compute E3: (B3-B2)/B2). ER1972 ER1971 ER 1971 (in Excel, the formula in cellarrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





