Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-hill Series Economics)
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-hill Series Economics)
9th Edition
ISBN: 9781259290619
Author: Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 7, Problem 7CACQ
To determine

The general rule for impact on HHI when two firms in market merge.

Expert Solution & Answer
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Sales of firms are termed in industry as: S1,S2,,S3........Sn respectively such total sales in the industry is Sr

When firms are not merged, then HHI is calculated as:

  10,000i=1n(SiST)2=10,000[(S1ST)2+(S2ST)2+...+(SiST)2+(Si+1ST)2+...+(SnST)2]

When there is merger between two firms: HHI is calculated as follows:

  10,000[(S1ST)2+(S2ST)2+...+(Si+Si+1ST)2+...+(SnST)2]

Difference between above two:

  10,000[(Si+Si+1Sr)2(SiST)2(Si+1ST)2]

  =10,000[2Si+Si+1ST2]

Since,

  SiST=Si+1ST=0.3

Comparison of HHI when firms are merged and not merged:

  10,000[2SiSi+1ST2]

  =10,000×2×0.3×0.3

  =1800

Value of HHI increases by 1800.

For the purpose of generalization, if the two firms merge, the increase in HHI post-merger is given by:

  10,000[(Si+Si+1ST)2(SiST)2(Si+1ST)2]

  =10,000[2SiSi+1ST2]

  =2×10,000×SiST×Si+1ST

Where, SiST and Si+1ST are the pre-merger market share of the two merging firms.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction:HHI is a measure to know concentration of market power in an industry. Higher the value of HHI, higher is the firm’s market power.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
answer
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781337617406
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning