Smith and Roberson's Business Law
Smith and Roberson's Business Law
16th Edition
ISBN: 9781285428253
Author: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
Publisher: Cengage Learning
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 7, Problem 3TS
Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person E and her 13 year old daughter bough few things and proceeded through checkout of

stores W. Anti theft alarm ringed and security guard R told E to step back inside and checked her contents. It was found that one item had security code on it. Security guard R never touched E or her daughter. No one in stores W threatened E and her daughter of arrest. Person M filed a tort case against stores W.

To discuss: Which party should prevail.

Blurred answer
Students have asked these similar questions
This week we will be building a regression model conceptually for our discussion assignment. Consider your current workplace (or previous/future workplace if not currently working) and answer the following set of questions. Expand where needed to help others understand your thinking: What are other potential dependent variables in this context? Consider your dependent variable of choice. What are all the factors you can think of that can help predict it?
Do you think Ms. Browne Sanders had the basis for a sexual harassment suit? Why?             I believe that Ms. Browne Sanders did in fact have the basis for a sexual harassment suit because her claims of retaliation from management after coming out about the verbal abuse and sexual harassment from her superiors, to me, are proven by her being let go shortly after bringing them to light. Not only that, but the jury found her case compelling enough to award her the $11 million (Sandomir, 2007). Sexual harassment cases like this are hard to make due to the reliance on the credibility of those involved (the victim and the perpetrator), one of which has it in his best interest to deny the claims outright. This leaves the victim in a vulnerable situation where retaliation can occur, such as this, because of the “he said she said” nature of the issue. A study done in 2023 showed the decline of women who report their harassment from 66% the previous year down to 59% (Cox, 2023). This was…
Do you think Ms. Browne Sanders had the basis for a sexual harassment suit? Why? I think Ms. Browne Sanders had a valid basis for a sexual harassment suit against the New York Knicks and her coach. The jury found that she was harassed and that the Knicks retaliated against her for it. According to the New York Times article, the evidence used in court showed a pattern of inappropriate behavior by Thomas, and this created a hostile work environment for her. Sexual harassment cases often use circumstantial evidence rather than direct proof, as harassment usually doesn't leave much concrete evidence. The Employee Rights Attorney Group article explains that harassment is illegal if it changes an employee's work conditions, making it difficult to do their job. Browne Sanders’ case cleared this bar, as she lost her job after reporting the harassment. Her claims were credible because a jury determined that the Knicks organization failed to address the issue appropriately. Retaliation can also…
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning