
The correct option in relation to the Nash equilibrium outcome in the classic prisoners’ dilemma game.

Answer to Problem 6MCQ
From the available options, the correct option is to lead one player to change his or her strategy, but not the other.
Explanation of Solution
The opportunity to successfully cooperate will include that there would be a change in one player’s strategy that, in turn, can change the strategy of other players because they get influenced by each other. Moreover, according to Nash equilibrium, no one benefits if any person modifies their approach while everyone else sticks with their original plan. Therefore, not both players will change their strategy as it will lead one player to change their strategy. The opportunity to successfully cooperate would not result in a better payoff for only one player because cooperation needs payoffs for both players equally. It means there would be an effect on the payoffs of both players.
Therefore, the correct option is b ( lead one player to change his or her strategy, but not the other) and all other options would be incorrect.
Introduction: An equilibrium where it is assumed that all players are aware of one another's equilibrium strategies and changing one's own strategy will not help anyone, is called Nash equilibrium.
Chapter 65 Solutions
Krugman's Economics For The Ap® Course
- Given the following petroleum tax details, calculate the marginal tax rate and explain its significance: Total Revenue: $500 million Cost of Operations: $200 million Tax Rate: 40% Additional Royalty: 5% Profit-Based Tax: 10%arrow_forwardUse a game tree to illustrate why an aircraft manufacturer may price below the current marginal cost in the short run if it has a steep learning curve. (Hint: Show that learning by doing lowers its cost in the second period.) Part 2 Assume for simplicity the game tree is illustrated in the figure to the right. Pricing below marginal cost reduces profits but gives the incumbent a cost advantage over potential rivals. What is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium?arrow_forwardAnswerarrow_forward
- M” method Given the following model, solve by the method of “M”. (see image)arrow_forwardAs indicated in the attached image, U.S. earnings for high- and low-skill workers as measured by educational attainment began diverging in the 1980s. The remaining questions in this problem set use the model for the labor market developed in class to walk through potential explanations for this trend. 1. Assume that there are just two types of workers, low- and high-skill. As a result, there are two labor markets: supply and demand for low-skill workers and supply and demand for high-skill workers. Using two carefully drawn labor-market figures, show that an increase in the demand for high skill workers can explain an increase in the relative wage of high-skill workers. 2. Using the same assumptions as in the previous question, use two carefully drawn labor-market figures to show that an increase in the supply of low-skill workers can explain an increase in the relative wage of high-skill workers.arrow_forwardPublished in 1980, the book Free to Choose discusses how economists Milton Friedman and Rose Friedman proposed a one-sided view of the benefits of a voucher system. However, there are other economists who disagree about the potential effects of a voucher system.arrow_forward
- The following diagram illustrates the demand and marginal revenue curves facing a monopoly in an industry with no economies or diseconomies of scale. In the short and long run, MC = ATC. a. Calculate the values of profit, consumer surplus, and deadweight loss, and illustrate these on the graph. b. Repeat the calculations in part a, but now assume the monopoly is able to practice perfect price discrimination.arrow_forwardThe projects under the 'Build, Build, Build' program: how these projects improve connectivity and ease of doing business in the Philippines?arrow_forwardhow utillity relate to microeconomics ?arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





