EBK ENGINEERING ECONOMY
16th Edition
ISBN: 9780133819014
Author: Koelling
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 6, Problem 51P
To determine
Calculate the capitalized worth.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Alternative A and B are two mutually exclusive cost alternatives, and one of them must be
selected. Using Incremental Analysis, which of the alternatives should be recommended based on
ERR (the External Rate of Return)? ·
MARR (Minimum acceptable rate of return) is 12% per year while the re-investment rate is
10% per year.
The study period is 20 years. Assume repeatability is appropriate for this comparison.
Alternative
A
B
$ (101,000)
$ (6,000)
20 years
$ (6,000)
$ (18,500 )
10 years
Initial capital investment
Annual operating expenses
Useful life
Salvage value
None
None
Charlie’s Truck Repair and Service has a new contract that requires him to purchase and maintain new equipment for work on 18-wheeler trucks and heavy road equipment. Two separate vendors have made quotes and estimates for Charlie.
Use the estimates and 6% per year return requirement to find the better economic option. One problem is that Charlie does not currently know if the contract will last for 5, 8, or 10 years. He needs a recommendation for all three time periods.
Table 1. Economical alternatives offered by Vendors
Answer please and take like
Chapter 6 Solutions
EBK ENGINEERING ECONOMY
Ch. 6 - Prob. 1PCh. 6 - The Consolidated Oil Company must install...Ch. 6 - Prob. 3PCh. 6 - Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are...Ch. 6 - Prob. 5PCh. 6 - Prob. 6PCh. 6 - Fiesta Foundry is considering a new furnace that...Ch. 6 - Prob. 8PCh. 6 - Prob. 9PCh. 6 - Consider the following cash flows for two mutually...
Ch. 6 - Prob. 11PCh. 6 - Prob. 12PCh. 6 - The alternatives for an engineering project to...Ch. 6 - Prob. 14PCh. 6 - Prob. 15PCh. 6 - Prob. 16PCh. 6 - Refer to the situation in Problem 6-16. Most...Ch. 6 - Prob. 18PCh. 6 - Prob. 19PCh. 6 - Prob. 20PCh. 6 - Prob. 21PCh. 6 - Prob. 22PCh. 6 - Prob. 23PCh. 6 - Prob. 24PCh. 6 - Prob. 25PCh. 6 - In the Rawhide Company (a leather products...Ch. 6 - Refer to Problem 6-2. Solve this problem using the...Ch. 6 - Prob. 28PCh. 6 - Prob. 29PCh. 6 - Prob. 30PCh. 6 - Prob. 31PCh. 6 - Prob. 32PCh. 6 - Prob. 33PCh. 6 - Potable water is in short supply in many...Ch. 6 - Prob. 35PCh. 6 - Prob. 36PCh. 6 - In the design of a special-use structure, two...Ch. 6 - Prob. 38PCh. 6 - a. Compare the probable part cost from Machine A...Ch. 6 - Prob. 40PCh. 6 - Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being...Ch. 6 - Prob. 42PCh. 6 - IBM is considering an environmentally conscious...Ch. 6 - Three mutually exclusive earth-moving pieces of...Ch. 6 - A piece of production equipment is to be replaced...Ch. 6 - Prob. 46PCh. 6 - Prob. 47PCh. 6 - Prob. 48PCh. 6 - Prob. 49PCh. 6 - Prob. 50PCh. 6 - Prob. 51PCh. 6 - Prob. 52PCh. 6 - Prob. 53PCh. 6 - Prob. 54PCh. 6 - Prob. 55PCh. 6 - Prob. 56PCh. 6 - Prob. 57PCh. 6 - Prob. 58PCh. 6 - Prob. 59PCh. 6 - Prob. 60PCh. 6 - Prob. 61PCh. 6 - Prob. 62PCh. 6 - Prob. 63PCh. 6 - Prob. 64PCh. 6 - Prob. 65PCh. 6 - Prob. 66PCh. 6 - Three models of baseball bats will be manufactured...Ch. 6 - Refer to Example 6-3. Re-evaluate the recommended...Ch. 6 - Prob. 69SECh. 6 - Prob. 70SECh. 6 - Prob. 71SECh. 6 - Prob. 72CSCh. 6 - Prob. 73CSCh. 6 - Prob. 74CSCh. 6 - Prob. 75FECh. 6 - Prob. 76FECh. 6 - Prob. 77FECh. 6 - Complete the following analysis of cost...Ch. 6 - Prob. 79FECh. 6 - For the following table, assume a MARR of 10% per...Ch. 6 - Prob. 81FECh. 6 - Problems 6-82 through 6-85. (6.4) Table P6-82 Data...Ch. 6 - Prob. 83FECh. 6 - Problems 6-82 through 6-85. (6.4) Table P6-82 Data...Ch. 6 - Problems 6-82 through 6-85. (6.4) Table P6-82 Data...Ch. 6 - Consider the mutually exclusive alternatives given...Ch. 6 - Prob. 87FE
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- An industrial coal-fired boiler for process steam is equipped with a 10-year-old electrostatic precipitator (ESP). Changes in coal quality have caused stack emissions to be in noncompliance with federal standards for particulates. Two mutually exclusive alternatives have been proposed to rectify this problem (doing nothing is not an option). The MARR is 9% per year. Make a recommendation regarding which alternative to select. 3. An industrial coal-fired boiler for process steam is equipped with a 10-year-old electrostatic precipitator (ESP). Changes in coal quality have caused stack emissions to be in noncompliance with federal standards for particulates. Two mutually exclusive alternatives have been proposed to rectify this problem (doing nothing is not an option). Capital investment Annual operating expenses Useful Life New Baghouse $1,140,000 $115,500 10 years New ESP $992,500 $73,200 10 years The MARR is 9% per year. Make a recommendation regarding which alternative to select.arrow_forwardRequired information In order to provide drinking water as part of its 50- year plan, a west coast city is considering constructing a pipeline for importing water from a nearby community that has a plentiful supply of brackish ground water. A full-sized pipeline can be constructed at a cost of $125 million now. Alternatively, a smaller pipeline can be constructed now for $65 million and enlarged 16 years from now for another $115 million. The pumping cost will be $25,000 per year higher for the smaller pipeline during the first 16 years, but it will be approximately the same thereafter. Both pipelines are expected to have the same useful life with no salvage value. At an interest rate of 6% per year, which alternative is more economical? The present worth of the full-sized pipeline is determined to be $ and that of the small-sized pipeline is $ pipeline is the most economical pipeline. The smallarrow_forwardNadine Chelesvig has patented her invention. She is offering a potential manufacturer two contracts for the exclusive right to manufacture and market her product. Plan A calls for an immediate single lump sum payment to her of $170,000. Plan B calls for an annual payment of $14,000 plus a royalty of $1.60 per unit sold. The remaining life of the patent is 10 years. Nadine uses a MARR of 10%/year. What must be the uniform annual sales volume of the product for Nadine to be indifferent between the contracts, based on an annual worth analysis? unitsarrow_forward
- Nadine Chelesvig has patented her invention. She is offering a potential manufacturer two contracts for the exclusive right to manufacture and market her product. Plan A calls for an immediate single lump sum payment to her of $175,000. Plan B calls for an annual payment of $14,000 plus a royalty of $3.90 per unit sold. The remaining life of the patent is 10 years. Nadine uses a MARR of 10%/year. What must be the uniform annual sales volume of the product for Nadine to be indifferent between the contracts, based on an units annual worth analysis? Carry all interim calculations to 5 decimal places and then round your final answer to the nearest unit. The tolerance is ±10.arrow_forwardA deep water port for imported liquefied natural gas (LNG) is needed for three years. At the end of the third year, it will cost more to dismantle the LNG facility than it produces in revenues. The cash flows are estimated as follows: The IRR for this LNG facility is closest to which choice below? Choose the closest answer below. A. The IRR for the LNG facility is 9.5% per year. B. The IRR for the LNG facility is 4.7% per year. C. The IRR for the LNG facility is 12.2% per year. D. The IRR for the LNG facility is 14.6% per year. EOY 0 1 2 3 Net Cash Flow - $54 million 44 million 40 million - 24 millionarrow_forwardThree different plans were presented to the Ahbhalet Corporation for operating an identity-theft scanning system. Plan A involves renewable 1-year contracts with payments of $1.1 million at the beginning of each year. Plan B is a 2-year contract that requires four payments of $360,000 each, with the first one made now and the other three at 6-month intervals. Plan C is a 3-year contract that entails payment of $3.5 million now and the second payment of $0.5 million 2 years from now. Assuming that the company could renew any of the plans under the same payment conditions, determine which plan is best on the basis of a PW analysis at a MARR of 6% per year compounded semiannually. The present worth of plan A is $ The best plan on the basis of the present worth analysis is plan B the present worth of plan B is $ and the present worth of plan C is $arrow_forward
- Dexcon Technologies, Inc. is evaluating two alternatives to produce its new plastic filament with tribological (i.e., low friction) properties for creating custom bearings for 3-D printers. The estimates associated with each alternative are shown below. Using a MARR of 20% per year, which alternative has the lower present worth? Method DDM LS First cost, $ −164,000 −370,000 M&O cost, $/year −55,000 −21,000 Salvage value, $ 0 30,000 Life, years 2 4arrow_forwardFast!arrow_forwardThree different plans were presented to the Ahbhalet Corporation for operating an identity-theft scanning system. Plan A involves renewable 1-year contracts with payments of $1.5 million at the beginning of each year. Plan B is a 2-year contract that requires four payments of $600,000 each, with the first one made now and the other three at 6-month Intervals. Plan C is a 3-year contract that entails payment of $3.1 million now and the second payment of $0.5 million 2 years from now. Assuming that the company could renew any of the plans under the same payment conditions, determine which plan is best on the basis of a PW analysis at a MARR of 6% per year compounded semiannually. The present worth of plan A is $ 1500000], the present worth of plan B is $ The best plan on the basis of the present worth analysis Is (Click to select) and the present worth of plan C is $[arrow_forward
- An engineer launches a project in the country's top technohub. This involves rental of a computer unit for online class students. He felt that because of the density of students in the area, 90% of his 30-units will be occupied per sem (5 months each) per year. He desires a rate of return of 20%. Other pertinent data are the following: Assess the project using (1) ROR, (2) Present Worth Method, and (3) Future Worth Method. (4) Estimate the payback period of this project. Help me solve this manually.arrow_forwardYou have been asked to evaluate two alternatives, X and Y, that may increase plant capacity for manufacturing high-pressure hydraulic hoses. The parameters associated with each alternative have been estimated. Which one should be selected on the basis of a present worth comparison at an interest rate of 12% per year? Why is yours the correct choice? Alternative X Y First cost, $ −45,000 −58,000 Maintenance cost, $/year −8,000 −4,000 Salvage value, $ 2,000 12,000 Life, years 5 5arrow_forwardA town in Wyoming wants to drill a geothermal well to provide district heating steam and hot water for its businesses and residences. After government subsidies, the capital investment for the well is $418,000, and the geothermal well will reduce natural gas consumption for steam and hot water production by $50,000 per year. The salvage value of the well is negligible. The simple payback period for this well is 9 years. If the MARR of the town is 6% per year and the life of the geothermal well is 25 years, what is the IRR for this project? Choose the closest answer below. OA. The IRR for the project is 12.1% per year. OB. The IRR for the project is 8.3% per year. OC. The IRR for the project is 13% per year. OD. The IRR for the project is 11.1% per year. CXXarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education