Assume that Atlas Sporting Goods Inc. has
a. Compute the anticipated return after financing costs with the most aggressive asset financing mix.
b. Compute the anticipated return after financing costs with the most conservative asset financing mix.
c. Compute the anticipated return after financing costs with the two moderate approaches to the asset financing mix.
d. If the firm used the most aggressive asset financing mix described in part a and had the anticipated return you computed for part a, what would earnings per share be if the tax rate on the anticipated return was 30 percent and there were 20,000 shares outstanding?
e. Now assume the most conservative asset financing mix described in part b will be utilized. The tax rate will be 30 percent. Also assume there will only be 5,000 shares outstanding. What will earnings per share be? Would it be higher or lower than the earnings per share computed for the most aggressive plan computed in part d?
a.
To calculate: The anticipated return, after deducting the finance costs, with the most aggressive approach of the asset financing mix.
Introduction:
Anticipated return:
It is the amount that an individual or company has estimated to earn from an investment. It is one of the factors taken into account by an investor before selecting an investment plan.
Aggressive approach:
When a company selects a plan of low liquidity with high return and long-term financing, it is termed as an aggressive approach.
Answer to Problem 11P
The anticipated return, after deducting the finance costs, with the most aggressive approach of the asset financing mix is $50,400.
Explanation of Solution
The calculation of the anticipated return is as follows.
Working notes:
The calculation of the return from the low liquidity plan is as follows.
The calculation of the finance cost of short-term financing is as follows.
b.
To calculate: The anticipated return, after deducting the finance costs, with the most conservative approach of the asset financing mix.
Introduction:
Conservative approach:
When a company selects a plan of high liquidity with low return and short-term financing, it is termed as a conservative approach.
Answer to Problem 11P
The anticipated return, after deducting the finance costs, with the most conservative approach of the asset financing mix is $8,400.
Explanation of Solution
The calculation of the anticipated return is as follows.
Working notes:
The calculation of the return from the high liquidity plan is as follows.
The calculation of the finance cost of long-term financing is as follows.
c.
To calculate: The anticipated return, after deducting the finance costs, with the two moderate approaches of the asset financing mix.
Introduction:
Moderate approach:
When a company selects a plan of low liquidity with high return and short-term financing or one of high liquidity with low return and long-term financing, it is termed as a moderate approach.
Answer to Problem 11P
The anticipated return, after deducting the finance costs, with the moderate approach of the low liquidity plan and long-term financing of the asset financing mix is $33,600.
The anticipated return, after deducting the finance costs, with the moderate approach of the high liquidity plan and short-term financing of the asset financing mix is $25,200.
Explanation of Solution
Anticipated return in the moderate approach of the low liquidity plan and long-term financing of the asset financing mix:
The calculation of the anticipated return is as follows.
Working notes:
The calculation of the return from the low liquidity plan is as follows.
The calculation of the finance costs of long-term financing is as follows.
Anticipated return in the moderate approach of the high liquidity plan and short-term financing of the asset financing mix:
The calculation of the anticipated return is as follows.
Working notes:
The calculation of the return from the high-liquidity plan is as follows.
The calculation of the finance costs of short-term financing is as follows.
d.
To calculate: The earnings per share if Atlas Sporting Goods Inc. uses the aggressive approach of the asset financing mix with the anticipated return computed in part (a).
Introduction:
Earnings per share:
It is a measurement of the company's profitability. It is calculated by dividing the net income less dividend paid for the prefernece stock by the average number of outstanding shares.
Answer to Problem 11P
The calculation of the earnings per share is as follows.
If Atlas Sporting Goods Inc. uses the aggressive approach of the asset financing mix with the anticipated return computed in part (a), its earnings per share is $1.76.
Explanation of Solution
The calculation of the earnings per share using Excel is as follows.
e.
To calculate: The earnings per share if Atlas Sporting Goods Inc. uses the conservative approach of the asset financing mix with the anticipated return computed in part (b) as well as to check whether it is higher or lower than the earnings per share computed in part (d).
Introduction:
Earnings per share:
It is a measurement of the company's profitability. It is calculated by dividing the net income less dividend paid for the preference stock by the average number of outstanding shares.
Answer to Problem 11P
The calculation of the earnings per share is as follows.
If Atlas Sporting Goods Inc. uses the conservative approach of the asset financing mix with the anticipated return computed in part (b), its earnings per share is $1.18.
The earnings per share by the conservative approach of the asset financing mix, that is, $1.18 is lower that by the aggressive approach of the asset financing mix, that is, $1.97.
Explanation of Solution
The formula used for the calculation of the earnings per share using Excel is as follows.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 6 Solutions
Loose Leaf for Foundations of Financial Management Format: Loose-leaf
- How has AirBnb negatively affected the US and global economy? How has Airbnb negatively affected the real estate market? How has Airbnb negatively affected homeowners and renters market? What happened to Airbnb in the Tax Dispute in Italy?arrow_forwardHow has AirBnb positively affected the US and global economy? How has Airbnb positively affected the real estate market? How has Airbnb positively affected homeowners and renters market?arrow_forwardD. (1) Consider the following cash inflows of a financial product. Given that the market interest rate is 12%, what price would you pay for these cash flows? Year 0 1 2 3 4 Cash Flow 160 170 180 230arrow_forward
- Explain why financial institutions generally engage in foreign exchange tradingactivities. Provide specific purposes or motivations behind such activities.arrow_forwardA. In 2008, during the global financial crisis, Lehman Brothers, one of the largest investment banks, collapsed and defaulted on its corporate bonds, causing significant losses for bondholders. This event highlighted several risks that investors in corporate bonds might face. What are the key risks an investor would encounter when investing in corporate bonds? Explain these risks with examples or academic references. [15 Marks]arrow_forwardTwo companies, Blue Plc and Yellow Plc, have bonds yielding 4% and 5.3%respectively. Blue Plc has a credit rating of AA, while Yellow Plc holds a BB rating. If youwere a risk-averse investor, which bond would you choose? Explain your reasoning withacademic references.arrow_forward
- B. Using the probabilities and returns listed below, calculate the expected return and standard deviation for Sparrow Plc and Hawk Plc, then justify which company a risk- averse investor might choose. Firm Sparrow Plc Hawk Plc Outcome Probability Return 1 50% 8% 2 50% 22% 1 30% 15% 2 70% 20%arrow_forward(2) Why are long-term bonds more susceptible to interest rate risk than short-term bonds? Provide examples to explain. [10 Marks]arrow_forwardDon't used Ai solutionarrow_forward
- Don't used Ai solutionarrow_forwardScenario one: Under what circumstances would it be appropriate for a firm to use different cost of capital for its different operating divisions? If the overall firm WACC was used as the hurdle rate for all divisions, would the riskier division or the more conservative divisions tend to get most of the investment projects? Why? If you were to try to estimate the appropriate cost of capital for different divisions, what problems might you encounter? What are two techniques you could use to develop a rough estimate for each division’s cost of capital?arrow_forwardScenario three: If a portfolio has a positive investment in every asset, can the expected return on a portfolio be greater than that of every asset in the portfolio? Can it be less than that of every asset in the portfolio? If you answer yes to one of both of these questions, explain and give an example for your answer(s). Please Provide a Referencearrow_forward
- EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTFinanceISBN:9781337514835Author:MOYERPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT