To determine:
Silencing the online reviewers is fair or not.
Introduction: The review column or portals are for giving the product reviews. The reviews are sometimes positive and sometimes negative.
Answer to Problem 11CT
Solution: It is not ethical to silence the online reviewer because it totally declines the purpose of reviews. The review is for the customers or consumers to read and know the product more. The companies should not resist the damaging complaints but should try to improve on their services and products.
Explanation of Solution
It is worst for the company’s growth to protect themselves from negative online reviews; instead, they should keep staff for responding to each of those comments. By working on the issues, the company would improve its reputation and gain customer trust. The company is not acting ethically if it is removing the online reviews or suing the authors for negative posts. It would be a good step f or law makers if they void disparagement clauses in small prints.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 6 Solutions
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Course List)
- help this answer.arrow_forwardcorrect answer is accounting.arrow_forwardAn asset was purchased for $72,000 with a salvage value of $6,000 on July 1, Year 1. It has an estimated useful life of 6 years. Using the straight-line method, how much depreciation expense should be recognized on December 31, Year 1? Helparrow_forward
- help this answer accounting.arrow_forwardNet operating income?arrow_forwardKelly Company purchased a bulldozer at a cost of $200,000. The bulldozer has an estimated salvage value of $25,000 and an estimated life of 10 years, or 15,000 hours of operation. The bulldozer was purchased on January 1, 2018, and was used 3,000 hours in 2018 and 2,500 hours in 2019. What amount will Kelly Company report as depreciation expense over the 10-year life of the equipment using straight-line depreciation?arrow_forward
