
A manager is trying to decide whether to purchase a certain part or to have it produced internally. Internal production could use either of two processes. One would entail a variable cost of $17 per unit and an annual fixed cost of $200,000; the other would entail a variable cost of $14 per unit and an annual fixed cost of $240,000. Three vendors are willing to provide the part. Vendor A has a price of $20 per unit for any volune up to 30,000 units. Vendor B has a price of $22 per unit for demand of 1,000 units or less, and $18 per unit for larger quantities. Vendor C offers a price of $21 per unit for the first 1,000 units, and $19 per unit for additional units.
a)

To determine: The best alternative from a cost standpoint for an annual volume of 10,000 units and 20,000 units.
Introduction: Decision-making is the process that helps to make decision. It is the process of choosing a best alternative by evaluating many alternatives.
Answer to Problem 8P
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
A manager has to decide whether to purchase a product or produce it internally. Internal production consists of two processes. Variable cost and fixed cost of the first process is $17 and $200,000 respectively. Variable cost and fixed cost of the second process is $14 and $240,000 respectively.
There are three vendors available to purchase a product. Vendor A has a price of $20 per unit up to 30,000 units. Vendor B has a price of $22 per unit if the demand is 1,000 units or less and $18 for larger volumes. Vendor C has a price of $21 per unit for first 1,000 units and $19 per unit for additional units.
Determine the best alternative from a cost standpoint for an annual volume of 10,000 units:
Calculate the total cost for the first internal process:
It is calculated by adding the fixed cost with the value attained by multiplying the variable cost and the annual volume. Annual volume is given as 10,000 units. Hence, the total cost for the first internal process is $370,000.
Calculate the total cost for the second internal process:
It is calculated by adding the fixed cost with the value attained by multiplying the variable cost and the annual volume. Annual volume is given as 10,000 units. Hence, the total cost for the first internal process is $380,000.
Calculate the total cost for the Vendor A:
It is calculated by multiplying the price and the annual volume. Hence, the total cost for Vendor A is $200,000.
Calculate the total cost for the Vendor B:
It is calculated by multiplying the price and the annual volume. It is given that the price is $22 if the volume is less than 1,000 and $18 if the volume is larger. As the annual volume is more than 1,000, the price is $18. Hence, the total cost for Vendor B is $180,000.
Calculate the total cost for the Vendor C:
It is calculated by multiplying the price and the annual volume. It is given that the price is $21 for the volume up to 1,000 and $19 for the additional volume. Thus, price is $21 for the 1,000 units and $19 for additional 9,000 units. Hence, the total cost for Vendor C is $192,000.
At the annual volume of 10,000 units, Vendor B has the lowest total cost of ($180,000). Hence, it should be chosen from a cost standpoint.
Determine the best alternative from a cost standpoint for an annual volume of 20,000 units:
Calculate the total cost for the first internal process:
It is calculated by adding the fixed cost with the value attained by multiplying the variable cost and the annual volume. Annual volume is given as 20,000 units. Hence, the total cost for the first internal process is $540,000.
Calculate the total cost for the second internal process:
It is calculated by adding the fixed cost with the value attained by multiplying the variable cost and the annual volume. Annual volume is given as 20,000 units. Hence, the total cost for the first internal process is $520,000.
Calculate the total cost for the Vendor A:
It is calculated by multiplying the price and the annual volume. Hence, the total cost for Vendor A is $400,000.
Calculate the total cost for the Vendor B:
It is calculated by multiplying the price and the annual volume. It is given that the price is $22 if the volume is less than 1,000 and $18 if the volume is larger. As the annual volume is more than 1,000, the price is $18. Hence, the total cost for Vendor B is $360,000.
Calculate the total cost for the Vendor C:
It is calculated by multiplying the price and the annual volume. It is given that the price is $21 for the volume up to 1,000 and $19 for the additional volume. Thus, price is $21 for the 1,000 units and $19 for additional 19,000 units. Hence, the total cost for Vendor C is $382,000.
At the annual volume of 20,000 units, Vendor B has the lowest total cost of ($360,000). Hence, it should be chosen from a cost standpoint.
b)

To determine: The range of the best alternative.
Introduction:Decision-making is the process that helps to make decision. It is the process of choosing a best alternative by evaluating many alternatives.
Answer to Problem 8P
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
A manager has to decide whether to purchase a product or produce it internally. Internal production consists of two processes. Variable cost and fixed cost of the first process is $17 and $200,000 respectively. Variable cost and fixed cost of the second process is $14 and $240,000 respectively.
There are three vendors available to purchase a product. Vendor A has a price of $20 per unit up to 30,000 units. Vendor B has a price of $22 per unit if the demand is 1,000 units or less and $18 for larger volumes. Vendor C has a price of $21 per unit for first 1,000 units and $19 per unit for additional units.
Cost function for each alternative if the annual volume is 1-1,000 units:
First internal process:
Second internal process:
Vendor A:
Vendor B:
Vendor C:
When considering the cost functions, Vendor A would exhibit less cost when compare to Vendor B and Vendor C. Vendor A should be preferred over other alternatives. The graph is as follows:
Cost function for each alternative if the annual volume is more than 1,000 units:
First internal process:
Second internal process:
Vendor A:
Vendor B:
Vendor C:
When considering the cost functions, Vendor B would dominate Vendor A and Vendor C. Hence, Vendor A and Vendor C should be eliminated. The graph considering two internal processes and Vendor B is as follows:
Determine the value of Q by equaling two cost equations:
Equal the cost function of second internal process and Vendor B to determine the value of Q.
Calculate the total cost of first internal process:
Substitute the value Q in the cost equation of first internal process. Hence, the total cost is $1,220,000.
Calculate the total cost of second internal process:
Substitute the value Q in the cost equation of second internal process. Hence, the total cost is $1,080,000.
Calculate the total cost of Vendor A:
Substitute the value Q in the cost equation of Vendor A. Hence, the total cost is $1,200,000.
Calculate the total cost of Vendor B:
Substitute the value Q in the cost equation of Vendor B. Hence, the total cost is $1,080,000.
Calculate the total cost of Vendor C:
Substitute the value Q in the cost equation of Vendor C. Hence, the total cost is $1,142,000.
Inference:
- Vendor A should be preferred when the purchasing quantity ranges from 1 to 1,000 units.
- Vendor B should be preferred when the purchasing quantity ranges from 1,001 to 59,999 units.
- There would indifferent between Vendor B and second internal process if the quantity is 60,000 units.
- Second internal process should be preferred if the quantity is more than 60,000 units.
First internal process and Vendor C are never best.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 5 Solutions
Loose Leaf for Operations Management (The Mcgraw-hill Series in Operations and Decision Sciences)
- Do you feel there is anything positive about rework?arrow_forwardDo you think technology can achieve faster setup times? How would it be implemented in the hospital workforce?arrow_forwardIn your experience or opinion, do you think process changes like organizing workspaces make a bigger difference, or is investing in technology usually the better solution for faster setups?arrow_forward
- Have you seen rework done in your business, and what was done to prevent that from occurring again?arrow_forwardResearch a company different than case studies examined and search the internet and find an example of a business that had to rework a process. How was the organization affected to rework a process in order to restore a good flow unit? Did rework hurt a process or improve the organization's operational efficiency? • Note: Include a reference with supportive citations in the discussion reply in your post.arrow_forwardSetup time is very important in affecting a process and the capacity of a process. How do you reduce setup time? Give examples of reducing setup time. Please Provide a referenecearrow_forward
- Do you think TPS was successful? If so, how? Are there other companies that have used TPS? If so, give examples. Please provide a referencearrow_forwardGiven the significant impact on finances, production timelines, and even equipment functionality, as you pointed out, what do you believe is the most effective single strategy a company can implement to significantly reduce the occurrence of rework within their operations?arrow_forwardDurban woman, Nombulelo Mkumla, took to social media last week to share how she discovered the rodent.In a lengthy Facebook post, she said she purchased the loaf of bread from a local shop after work on August 27.For the next days, Mkumla proceeded to use slices of bread from the load to make toast."Then, on the morning of August 31, I took the bread out of the fridge to make toast and noticed something disgusting andscary. I took a picture and sent it to my friends, and one of them said, 'Yi mpuku leyo tshomi' [That's a rat friend]“."I was in denial and suggested it might be something else, but the rat scenario made sense - it's possible the rat got into thebread at the factory, and no one noticed," Mkumla said.She went back to the shop she'd bought the bread from and was told to lay a complaint directly with the supplier.She sent an email with a video and photographs of the bread.Mkumla said she was later contacted by a man from Sasko who apologised for the incident.According to…arrow_forward
- PepsiCo South Africa says the incident where a woman discovered part of a rodent in her loaf of bread, is anisolated occurrence.Durban woman, Nombulelo Mkumla, took to social media last week to share how she discovered the rodent.In a lengthy Facebook post, she said she purchased the loaf of bread from a local shop after work on August 27.For the next days, Mkumla proceeded to use slices of bread from the load to make toast."Then, on the morning of August 31, I took the bread out of the fridge to make toast and noticed something disgusting andscary. I took a picture and sent it to my friends, and one of them said, 'Yi mpuku leyo tshomi' [That's a rat friend]“."I was in denial and suggested it might be something else, but the rat scenario made sense - it's possible the rat got into thebread at the factory, and no one noticed," Mkumla said.She went back to the shop she'd bought the bread from and was told to lay a complaint directly with the supplier.She sent an email with a video and…arrow_forwardDurban woman, Nombulelo Mkumla, took to social media last week to share how she discovered the rodent.In a lengthy Facebook post, she said she purchased the loaf of bread from a local shop after work on August 27.For the next days, Mkumla proceeded to use slices of bread from the load to make toast."Then, on the morning of August 31, I took the bread out of the fridge to make toast and noticed something disgusting andscary. I took a picture and sent it to my friends, and one of them said, 'Yi mpuku leyo tshomi' [That's a rat friend]“."I was in denial and suggested it might be something else, but the rat scenario made sense - it's possible the rat got into thebread at the factory, and no one noticed," Mkumla said.She went back to the shop she'd bought the bread from and was told to lay a complaint directly with the supplier.She sent an email with a video and photographs of the bread.Mkumla said she was later contacted by a man from Sasko who apologised for the incident.According to…arrow_forwardRead the project statement and answer ALL of the questions that follow PROJECT STATEMENT The African Integrated High-Speed Railway Network (AIHSRN). African nations are preparing to invest billions in a significant overhaul of their rail infrastructure as part of an ambitious plan for the continent. One of the key projects underway is the African Integrated High-Speed Railway Network (AIHSRN), which aims to connect Africa's capital cities and major commercial centres with a high-speed railway network to enhance continental trade and competition. This network will span 2,000 km (1,243 miles) and connect 60 cities, including Nairobi, Lagos, Cairo, and Dakar. It will improve access to essential markets, enhance economic cooperation, and encourage regional collaboration. The plan is poised to revolutionise intra-African trade by reducing travel times and lowering transportation costs, making trade between African nations more competitive. The trains will be capable of reaching speeds of up…arrow_forward
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,MarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033791Author:Pride, William MPublisher:South Western Educational PublishingPurchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Contemporary MarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033777Author:Louis E. Boone, David L. KurtzPublisher:Cengage Learning


