EP PRIN.OF OPERATIONS MGMT.-MYOMLAB
10th Edition
ISBN: 9780134183848
Author: HEIZER
Publisher: PEARSON CO
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 24P
a)
Summary Introduction
To determine: The best decision when Mr. T is assumed to possess the semiconductor.
Introduction: Expected monetary value (EMV) is a calculation system for expected returns for the certain decision made by a company.
b)
Summary Introduction
To determine: The criteria used in decision making.
c)
Summary Introduction
To determine: The worst and the best outcome to Mr. T as a result of the decision made.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Ritz Products’s materials manager, Tej Dhakar,must determine whether to make or buy a new semiconduc-tor for the wrist TV that the firm is about to produce. Onemillion units are expected to be produced over the life cycle.If the product is made, start-up and production costs of themake decision total $1 million, with a probability of .4 thatthe product will be satisfactory and a .6 probability that itwill not. If the product is not satisfactory, the firm will haveto reevaluate the decision. If the decision is reevaluated, thechoice will be whether to spend another $1 million to redesignthe semiconductor or to purchase. Likelihood of success thesecond time that the make decision is made is .9. If the secondmake decision also fails, the firm must purchase. Regardlessof when the purchase takes place, Dhakar’s best judgment ofcost is that Ritz will pay $.50 for each purchased semiconduc-tor plus $1 million in vendor development cost.a) Assuming that Ritz must have the semiconductor…
*please dont use excel to solve.*
Just BRIEFLY explain b & c
for b:
elaborate/explain the criteria used.
for c:
elaborate why it is labeled "worst" and "best" case scenario
Chapter 5 Solutions
EP PRIN.OF OPERATIONS MGMT.-MYOMLAB
Ch. 5.S - Prob. 1DQCh. 5.S - Prob. 2DQCh. 5.S - Prob. 3DQCh. 5.S - Discuss the 3 Rs.Ch. 5.S - Prob. 5DQCh. 5.S - Prob. 6DQCh. 5.S - Prob. 7DQCh. 5.S - Prob. 1PCh. 5.S - Prob. 2PCh. 5.S - Prob. 3P
Ch. 5.S - Prob. 4PCh. 5.S - Prob. 5PCh. 5.S - Prob. 6PCh. 5.S - Prob. 7PCh. 5.S - Prob. 8PCh. 5.S - Prob. 9PCh. 5.S - Prob. 10PCh. 5.S - A Southern Georgia school district is considering...Ch. 5.S - Prob. 12PCh. 5.S - Prob. 13PCh. 5.S - Prob. 14PCh. 5.S - Prob. 15PCh. 5.S - Prob. 16PCh. 5.S - Prob. 17PCh. 5.S - Prob. 18PCh. 5.S - Prob. 19PCh. 5.S - Prob. 1.1VCCh. 5.S - Prob. 1.2VCCh. 5.S - Prob. 1.3VCCh. 5.S - Prob. 2.1VCCh. 5.S - Prob. 2.2VCCh. 5.S - Prob. 2.3VCCh. 5 - Prob. 1EDCh. 5 - Prob. 1DQCh. 5 - What techniques do we use to define a product? ...Ch. 5 - Prob. 3DQCh. 5 - Prob. 4DQCh. 5 - Prob. 5DQCh. 5 - Prob. 6DQCh. 5 - Describe four organizational approaches to product...Ch. 5 - Explain what is meant by robust design.Ch. 5 - Prob. 9DQCh. 5 - What information is contained in a bill of...Ch. 5 - What information is contained in an engineering...Ch. 5 - What information is contained in an assembly...Ch. 5 - Prob. 13DQCh. 5 - Explain how the house of quality translates...Ch. 5 - Prob. 15DQCh. 5 - Prob. 16DQCh. 5 - Why are the direct interaction and surrogate...Ch. 5 - Prob. 18DQCh. 5 - Prob. 1PCh. 5 - Prob. 2PCh. 5 - Construct a house of quality matrix for a...Ch. 5 - Prob. 5PCh. 5 - Prob. 6PCh. 5 - Prob. 7PCh. 5 - Prob. 8PCh. 5 - Prepare a bill of material for (a) a pair of...Ch. 5 - Prob. 10PCh. 5 - Prepare a script for telephone callers at the...Ch. 5 - Prob. 12PCh. 5 - Prob. 18PCh. 5 - Review strategic process positioning options for...Ch. 5 - Select a service business that involves...Ch. 5 - Prob. 21PCh. 5 - Prob. 22PCh. 5 - Residents of Mill River have fond memories of ice...Ch. 5 - Prob. 24PCh. 5 - Prob. 25PCh. 5 - Prob. 26PCh. 5 - Prob. 27PCh. 5 - Prob. 1CSCh. 5 - Prob. 2CSCh. 5 - Prob. 3CSCh. 5 - Prob. 1VCCh. 5 - Prob. 2VCCh. 5 - Prob. 3VCCh. 5 - Prob. 4VC
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?arrow_forward
- Ritz Products's materials manager, Tej Dhakar, must determine whether to make or buy a new semiconductor for the wrist TV that the firm is about to produce. One million units are expected to be produced over the life cycle. If the product is made, start-up and production costs of the make decision total $3 million, with a probability of 0.4 that the product will be satisfactory and a 0.6 probability that it will not. If the product is not satisfactory, the firm will have to reevaluate the decision. If the decision is reevaluated, the choice will be whether to spend another $3 million to redesign the semiconductor or to purchase. Likelihood of success the second time that the make decision is made is 0.8. If the second make decision also fails, the firm must purchase. Regardless of when the purchase takes place, Dhakar's best judgment of cost is that Ritz will pay $0.40 for each purchased semiconductor plus $2 million in vendor development cost. Part 2 a) Assuming that…arrow_forward1. Decision Rules. A company is choosing a motorized mechanism for a new toy, a dancing ballerina (TippiToes) that is currently under development. Demand is uncertain. but the company is confident that demand will be: Light (25,000 units), Moderate (100,000 units) or Heavy (150,000) units. The payoff table for each mechanism (in $) is given below. Action: Choice of Mechanism Event Gears and Levers Spring Weights and Pulleys Pneumatic Light 25,000 -10,000 -125,000 -300,000 Moderate 400,000 440,000 400,000 300,000 Heavy 650,000 740,000 750,000 700,000 Questions: (1) Apply Maximax, Maximin, Minimax Regret, and EMV rules (assuming that the probability of Light demand is 0.1, Moderate demand is 0.7, and Heavy demand is 0.2) to decide what mechanism should the company choose? (2) What is the expected value of perfect information? (3) Draw a decision tree to solve this problem.arrow_forward2. Come up with a decision using each of the different criteria under conditions of uncertainty using the table below. The payoff values are expressed as LOSSES and alpha = 0.5 State of Nature (Production Rate) Alternatives Very Low Low Moderate High Machine Brand A Machine Brand B Machine Brand C Machine Brand D Machine Brand E 163 125 -87 -19 58 128 -90 -59 36 40 185 -21 13 -56 -71 106 11 48 -55 107 Machine Brand F -98 -94 -24 Machine Brand G -33 176 165 16arrow_forward
- Ritz Products's materials manager, Tej Dhakar, must determine whether to make or buy a new semiconductor for the wrist TV that the firm is about to produce. Three million units are expected to be produced over the life cycle. If the product is made, start-up and production costs of the make decision total $2 million, with a probability of 0.5 that the product will be satisfactory and a 0.5 probability that it will not. If the product is not satisfactory, the firm will have to reevaluate the decision. If the decision is reevaluated, the choice will be whether to spend another $2 million to redesign the semiconductor or to purchase. Likelihood of success the second time that the make decision is made is 0.8. If the second make decision also fails, the firm must purchase. Regardless of when the purchase takes place, Dhakar's best judgment of cost is that Ritz will pay $0.60 for each purchased semiconductor plus $2 million in vendor development cost. a) Assuming that Ritz must have the…arrow_forwardRitz Products's materials manager, Tej Dhakar, must determine whether to make or buy a new semiconductor for the wrist TV that the firm is about to produce. Four million units are expected to be produced over the life cycle. If the product is made, start-up and production costs of the make decision total $1 million, with a probability of 0.5 that the product will be satisfactory and a 0.5 probability that it will not. If the product is not satisfactory, the firm will have to reevaluate the decision. If the decision is reevaluated, the choice will be whether to spend another $1 million to redesign the semiconductor or to purchase. Likelihood of success the second time that the make decision is made is 0.8. If the second make decision also fails, the firm must purchase. Regardless of when the purchase takes place, Dhakar's best judgment cost is that Ritz will pay $0.50 for each purchased semiconductor plus $2 million in vendor development cost. a) Assuming that Ritz must have the…arrow_forwardRitz Products's materials manager, Tej Dhakar, must determine whether to make or buy a new semiconductor for the wrist TV that the firm is about to produce. Three million units are expected to be produced over the life cycle. If the product is made, start-up and production costs of the make decision total $1 million, with a probability of 0.5 that the product will be satisfactory and a 0.5 probability that it will not. If the product is not satisfactory, the firm will have to reevaluate the decision. If the decision is reevaluated, the choice will be whether to spend another $1 million to redesign the semiconductor or to purchase. Likelihood of success the second time that the make decision is made is 0.8. If the second make decision also fails, the firm must purchase. Regardless of when the purchase takes place, Dhakar's best judgment of cost is that Ritz will pay $0.40 for each purchased semiconductor plus $2 million in vendor development cost. a) Assuming that Ritz…arrow_forward
- Come up with a decision using each of the different criteria under conditions of uncertainty using the table below. The payoff values are expressed as LOSSES.arrow_forwardMacDonald Products, Inc., of Clarkson, New York, has the option of (a) proceeding immediately with production of a new top-of-the-line stereo TV that has just completed prototype testing or (b) having the value analysis team complete a study. If Tyrone Martin, VP for operations, proceeds with the existing prototype (option a), the firm can expect sales to be 110,000 units at $600 each, with a probability of 0.39 and a 0.61 probability of 70,000 at $600. If, however, he uses the value analysis team (option b), the firm expects sales of 75,000 units at $770, with a probability of 0.76 and a 0.24 probability of 70,000 units at $770. Value engineering, at a cost of $110,000, is only used in option b. Which option has the highest expected monetary value (EMV)? The EMV for option a is $ and the EMV for option b is $ monetary value. (Enter your responses as integers.) Therefore, option has the highest expectedarrow_forwardMacDonald Products, Inc., of Clarkson, New York, has the option of (a) proceeding immediately with production of a new top-of-the-line stereo TV that has just completed prototype testing or (b) having the value analysis team complete a study. If Tyrone Martin, VP for operations, proceeds with the existing prototype (option a), the firm can expect sales to be 120,000 units at $570 each, with a probability of 0.34 and a 0.66 probability of 70,000 at $570. If, however, he uses the value analysis team (option b), the firm expects s 90,000 units at $710, with a probability of 0.74 and a 0.26 probability of 60,000 units at $710. Value engineering, at a cost of $90,000, is only used in option b. Which option has the highest expected monetary value (EMV)? The EMV for option a is $ and the EMV for option b is $. Therefore, option has the highest expected monetary value. (Enter your responses as integers.)arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,
Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
MarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033791Author:Pride, William MPublisher:South Western Educational Publishing
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Marketing
Marketing
ISBN:9780357033791
Author:Pride, William M
Publisher:South Western Educational Publishing