(a)
When the higher payments catch up in total dollars received with the lower payment that begins earlier.

Answer to Problem 101P
The higher payments catch up in total dollars received with the lower payment that begins earlier in the 18 Year in case of higher payments collected.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Option A: Receive $2,000 per month from age 66 − 85 i.e. 19 Years
Option B: Receive $1,500 per month from age 62 − 85 i.e. 23 Years.
Based on the above information, the following tables express the total cumulative dollars received.
Annual Receipts (Option 1) = $2,000 × 12 = $24,000
Annual Receipts (Option 2) = $1,500 × 12 = $18,000
Option 1: $2,000 from Age 66 - 85 | Option 2: $1,500 from Age 62 - 85 | ||||
Age | Annual Receipt | Cumulative Receipt | Age | Annual Receipt | Cumulative Receipt |
66 | $24,000.00 | $24,000.00 | 62 | $18,000.00 | $18,000.00 |
67 | $24,000.00 | $48,000.00 | 63 | $18,000.00 | $36,000.00 |
68 | $24,000.00 | $72,000.00 | 64 | $18,000.00 | $54,000.00 |
69 | $24,000.00 | $96,000.00 | 65 | $18,000.00 | $72,000.00 |
70 | $24,000.00 | $120,000.00 | 66 | $18,000.00 | $90,000.00 |
71 | $24,000.00 | $144,000.00 | 67 | $18,000.00 | $108,000.00 |
72 | $24,000.00 | $168,000.00 | 68 | $18,000.00 | $126,000.00 |
73 | $24,000.00 | $192,000.00 | 69 | $18,000.00 | $144,000.00 |
74 | $24,000.00 | $216,000.00 | 70 | $18,000.00 | $162,000.00 |
75 | $24,000.00 | $240,000.00 | 71 | $18,000.00 | $180,000.00 |
76 | $24,000.00 | $264,000.00 | 72 | $18,000.00 | $198,000.00 |
77 | $24,000.00 | $288,000.00 | 73 | $18,000.00 | $216,000.00 |
78 | $24,000.00 | $312,000.00 | 74 | $18,000.00 | $234,000.00 |
79 | $24,000.00 | $336,000.00 | 75 | $18,000.00 | $252,000.00 |
80 | $24,000.00 | $360,000.00 | 76 | $18,000.00 | $270,000.00 |
81 | $24,000.00 | $384,000.00 | 77 | $18,000.00 | $288,000.00 |
82 | $24,000.00 | $408,000.00 | 78 | $18,000.00 | $306,000.00 |
83 | $24,000.00 | $432,000.00 | 79 | $18,000.00 | $324,000.00 |
84 | $24,000.00 | $456,000.00 | 80 | $18,000.00 | $342,000.00 |
85 | $24,000.00 | $480,000.00 | 81 | $18,000.00 | $360,000.00 |
82 | $18,000.00 | $378,000.00 | |||
83 | $18,000.00 | $396,000.00 | |||
84 | $18,000.00 | $414,000.00 | |||
85 | $18,000.00 | $432,000.00 |
From the above table, it can be seen that the cumulative collection in Year 23 is $432,000 in case of Option 2 and in case of Option 1 the cumulative collection in Year 18 is $432,000.
Conclusion:
Hence the year in which higher payments catch up in total dollars received with the lower payment that begins earlier is determined.
(b)
Which alternative has the higher Present value.

Answer to Problem 101P
The alternative with the higher Present value is Option 1 i.e. Collect payments of $2,000 per month from age 66 − 85.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Option A: Receive $2,000 per month from age 66 − 85
Option B: Receive $1,500 per month from age 62 − 85.
Based on the above information, the following tables express the total cumulative dollars received.
Annual Receipts (Option 1) = $2,000 × 12 = $24,000
Annual Receipts (Option 2) = $1,500 × 12 = $18,000
Option 1: $2,000 from Age 66 - 85 | Option 2: $1,500 from Age 62 - 85 | ||||||
Age | Annual Receipt | P.V.Factor @ 6% | Present Value of Amount | Age | Annual Receipt | P.V.Factor @ 6% | Present Value of Amount |
1 | $24,000.00 | 0.9434 | $22,641.60 | 1 | $18,000.00 | 0.9434 | $16,981.20 |
2 | $24,000.00 | 0.8900 | $21,360.00 | 2 | $18,000.00 | 0.8900 | $16,020.00 |
3 | $24,000.00 | 0.8396 | $20,150.40 | 3 | $18,000.00 | 0.8396 | $15,112.80 |
4 | $24,000.00 | 0.7921 | $19,010.40 | 4 | $18,000.00 | 0.7921 | $14,257.80 |
5 | $24,000.00 | 0.7473 | $17,935.20 | 5 | $18,000.00 | 0.7473 | $13,451.40 |
6 | $24,000.00 | 0.7050 | $16,920.00 | 6 | $18,000.00 | 0.7050 | $12,690.00 |
7 | $24,000.00 | 0.6651 | $15,962.40 | 7 | $18,000.00 | 0.6651 | $11,971.80 |
8 | $24,000.00 | 0.6274 | $15,057.60 | 8 | $18,000.00 | 0.6274 | $11,293.20 |
9 | $24,000.00 | 0.5919 | $14,205.60 | 9 | $18,000.00 | 0.5919 | $10,654.20 |
10 | $24,000.00 | 0.5584 | $13,401.60 | 10 | $18,000.00 | 0.5584 | $10,051.20 |
11 | $24,000.00 | 0.5268 | $12,643.20 | 11 | $18,000.00 | 0.5268 | $9,482.40 |
12 | $24,000.00 | 0.4970 | $11,928.00 | 12 | $18,000.00 | 0.4970 | $8,946.00 |
13 | $24,000.00 | 0.4688 | $11,251.20 | 13 | $18,000.00 | 0.4688 | $8,438.40 |
14 | $24,000.00 | 0.4423 | $10,615.20 | 14 | $18,000.00 | 0.4423 | $7,961.40 |
15 | $24,000.00 | 0.4173 | $10,015.20 | 15 | $18,000.00 | 0.4173 | $7,511.40 |
16 | $24,000.00 | 0.3936 | $9,446.40 | 16 | $18,000.00 | 0.3936 | $7,084.80 |
17 | $24,000.00 | 0.3714 | $8,913.60 | 17 | $18,000.00 | 0.3714 | $6,685.20 |
18 | $24,000.00 | 0.3503 | $8,407.20 | 18 | $18,000.00 | 0.3503 | $6,305.40 |
19 | $24,000.00 | 0.3305 | $7,932.00 | 19 | $18,000.00 | 0.3305 | $5,949.00 |
20 | $24,000.00 | 0.3118 | $7,483.20 | 20 | $18,000.00 | 0.3118 | $5,612.40 |
21 | $18,000.00 | 0.2942 | $5,295.60 | ||||
22 | $18,000.00 | 0.2775 | $4,995.00 | ||||
23 | $18,000.00 | 0.2618 | $4,712.40 | ||||
24 | $18,000.00 | 0.2470 | $4,446.00 | ||||
$275,280.00 | $225,909.00 |
Net present value is the difference of Sum of Present values of cash inflows and Sum of Present values of
In the given scenario, Present values are calculated by calculating the present values of cash inflows in the form of annual receipts.
Present value factor is calculated as 1/1.06 ^ N where N is the year.
From the above table, it can be seen that the net present value of Option 1 far exceeds the net present value of option 2.
Conclusion:
Hence the option with the higher net present value is determined.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 5 Solutions
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS W/DASHBOARD
- Use a game tree to illustrate why an aircraft manufacturer may price below the current marginal cost in the short run if it has a steep learning curve. (Hint: Show that learning by doing lowers its cost in the second period.) Part 2 Assume for simplicity the game tree is illustrated in the figure to the right. Pricing below marginal cost reduces profits but gives the incumbent a cost advantage over potential rivals. What is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium?arrow_forwardAnswerarrow_forwardM” method Given the following model, solve by the method of “M”. (see image)arrow_forward
- As indicated in the attached image, U.S. earnings for high- and low-skill workers as measured by educational attainment began diverging in the 1980s. The remaining questions in this problem set use the model for the labor market developed in class to walk through potential explanations for this trend. 1. Assume that there are just two types of workers, low- and high-skill. As a result, there are two labor markets: supply and demand for low-skill workers and supply and demand for high-skill workers. Using two carefully drawn labor-market figures, show that an increase in the demand for high skill workers can explain an increase in the relative wage of high-skill workers. 2. Using the same assumptions as in the previous question, use two carefully drawn labor-market figures to show that an increase in the supply of low-skill workers can explain an increase in the relative wage of high-skill workers.arrow_forwardPublished in 1980, the book Free to Choose discusses how economists Milton Friedman and Rose Friedman proposed a one-sided view of the benefits of a voucher system. However, there are other economists who disagree about the potential effects of a voucher system.arrow_forwardThe following diagram illustrates the demand and marginal revenue curves facing a monopoly in an industry with no economies or diseconomies of scale. In the short and long run, MC = ATC. a. Calculate the values of profit, consumer surplus, and deadweight loss, and illustrate these on the graph. b. Repeat the calculations in part a, but now assume the monopoly is able to practice perfect price discrimination.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





