Concept explainers
FOCUS ON EVOLUTION
The fossil record indicates that there have been five mass extinction events in the past 500 million years (see Concept 23.2). Many ecologists think we are currently entering a human-caused sixth mass extinction event. Briefly discuss the history of mass extinctions and the length of time it typically takes for species diversity to recover through the process of evolution. Explain why this should motivate us to slow the loss of biodiversity today.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 43 Solutions
Campbell Biology in Focus (2nd Edition)
Additional Science Textbook Solutions
Fundamentals of Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Loose Leaf For Integrated Principles Of Zoology
Microbiology Fundamentals: A Clinical Approach - Standalone book
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & Physiology
Genetics: From Genes to Genomes, 5th edition
- Is extinction normal? Explain. What is NOT normal about it now? Why is the loss of biodiversity so crucial to Earth and us?arrow_forwardExtinction Match the following items. NOTE: If you want to change your selection, you'll need to delete the one you already chose. After you delete it, the list of choices will pop back up and you can make a different choice. Sudden, dramatic loss of biodiversity mass extinction Routine loss of biodiversity; about 1 per million species years background extinctionarrow_forwardplease very soon full explanationarrow_forward
- Create a Venn Diagram comparing and contrasting rapid and gradual mass extinction (make sure to include examples of each)arrow_forwardMass extinction has never been documented to occur before occurs often, with rapid recovery of species diversity has occurred five times in the past, but is occurring more quickly this time O has occurred once before due to human activities cannot be distinguished from background extinction ratesarrow_forward1) The very high levels of Iridium at the KT boundary was confirmed in different parts of the world and supported an already existing hypothesis, a supernova had caused the extinction. How was this hypothesis tested? • Scientists looked for planetary evidence of a supernova • Scientists ruled out all the other hypothesis and only the supernova was left • Scientists tested the amount of plutonium in the KT boundary • Scientists studied craters from ancient asteroids 2) How was community feedback important in developing the asteroid hypothesis? • Working alone allowed Walter to remain unbiased • Scientists working together were able to prove all the alternate hypotheses wrong • Scientists collected multiple lines of evidence from different fields to support the hypothesis • Other scientists were able to disprove the asteroid hypotheses 3) The evidence that an asteroid did hit earth at the KT boundary is strong. But did it cause extinction of the dinosaurs? What additional hypotheses are…arrow_forward
- Extinction is a natural phenomenon. It is estimated that 99% of all species that ever lived are now extinct. Why then do we say that we are now experiencing an extinction (loss of biodiversity) crisis? O Humans have greater medical needs than at any other time in history, and many potential medicinal compounds are being lost as plant species become extinct. Scientists have finally identified most of the species on Earth and are thus able to quantify the number of species becoming extinct. Most biodiversity hot spots have been destroyed by recent ecological disasters. The current rate of extinction is high and human activities threaten biodiversity at all levels. Humans are ethically responsible for protecting endangered species.arrow_forwardplease explain A drawback of the time hypothesis to explain the variation in species richness is that 1. Cannot account for algal diversity. 2. Fossils do not preserve well in the oceans. 3. Geological activity may interfere with species richness measurements. 4. It is not applicable to marine ecosystems because there was no glaciation in oceans. 5. Humans significantly modified marine environments.arrow_forwarddo you think that loss of species (species extinctions) are something that humans should be concerned about? Support your answer with at least 2 supporting details.arrow_forward
- Metapopulations: model The figure below indicates overall colonization and extinction patterns based on patch occupancy for a given metapopulation. If the patch occupancy (P) of the metapopulation is 0.5, which of the following statements is most likely true? Overall Colonization Rate cP(1-P) Overall Extinction Rate - eP A. The patch occupancy is at equilibrium (i.e. not changing). 10 0.75 B. The patch occupancy is expected to 0.50 increase. 0.25 C. The patch occupancy is expected to 00 0.0 0.25 0.50 0.75 Patch Occupancy (P) decrease. Equilibrium Patch Occupancy- 0.65 D. None of the above statements is true. Overall Colonization/Extinction Ratesarrow_forwardWhat are two ways humans can preserve biomass? DO NOT COPY FROM GOOGLEarrow_forwardTwo terrestrial ecosystems based on photosynthesis and chemolithosynthesis (hydrothermal vents) trap their energy from specific energy sources. Tidal squeezing has also been suggested. The type of energy sources define the character of the ecosystems observed. What other energy source can you identify that might drive other kinds of ecosystems elsewhere in the universe? Speculate on the type of organisms that might evolve based on that energy source.What would be the characteristics of the primary producers (the organisms that trap the energy)?arrow_forward
- Biology (MindTap Course List)BiologyISBN:9781337392938Author:Eldra Solomon, Charles Martin, Diana W. Martin, Linda R. BergPublisher:Cengage LearningBiology: The Dynamic Science (MindTap Course List)BiologyISBN:9781305389892Author:Peter J. Russell, Paul E. Hertz, Beverly McMillanPublisher:Cengage Learning