MASTERINGPHYSICS W/ETEXT ACCESS CODE 6
13th Edition
ISBN: 9781269542661
Author: YOUNG
Publisher: PEARSON C
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 40, Problem 40.9DQ
To determine
To explain: Whether it is possible to represent the wave function of a particle in a box as a combination of two standing waves and the physical interpretation of this representation.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
1. Given the following probability density function: p(x) = Ae¬^(x-a)².
2. A particle of mass, m, has the wavefunction given by: Þ(x,t) = Ce-a[(mx²/h) + it] .
3. In a few sentences, explain why it is impossible to calculate (p) in the first problem, whereas in the
second problem this is straightforward. Highlight the key concepts that differentiate these problems.
2. Consider a system with Neumann boundary conditions. Show that the Neumann Green's
function is symmetric under exchange of its two position variables i.e.
Gr(7,7") = Gy(", 5).
GN(F,")
3. A particle of mass m moves in one dimension in a potential given
by v(s)-c). where 8() is the Dirac delta function. The particle is
bound. Find the value , such that the probability of finding the
particle with l<, is exactly 1/2.
Chapter 40 Solutions
MASTERINGPHYSICS W/ETEXT ACCESS CODE 6
Ch. 40.1 - Does a wave packet given by Eq. (40.19) represent...Ch. 40.2 - Prob. 40.2TYUCh. 40.3 - Prob. 40.3TYUCh. 40.4 - Prob. 40.4TYUCh. 40.5 - Prob. 40.5TYUCh. 40.6 - Prob. 40.6TYUCh. 40 - Prob. 40.1DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.2DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.3DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.4DQ
Ch. 40 - If a panicle is in a stationary state, does that...Ch. 40 - Prob. 40.6DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.7DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.8DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.9DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.10DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.11DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.12DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.13DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.14DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.15DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.16DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.17DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.18DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.19DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.20DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.21DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.22DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.23DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.24DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.25DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.26DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.27DQCh. 40 - Prob. 40.1ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.2ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.3ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.4ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.5ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.6ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.7ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.8ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.9ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.10ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.11ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.12ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.13ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.14ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.15ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.16ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.17ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.18ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.19ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.20ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.21ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.22ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.23ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.24ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.25ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.26ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.27ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.28ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.29ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.30ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.31ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.32ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.33ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.34ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.35ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.36ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.37ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.38ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.39ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.40ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.41ECh. 40 - Prob. 40.42PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.43PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.44PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.45PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.46PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.47PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.48PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.49PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.50PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.51PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.52PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.53PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.54PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.55PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.56PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.57PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.58PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.59PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.60PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.61PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.62PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.63PCh. 40 - Prob. 40.64CPCh. 40 - Prob. 40.65CPCh. 40 - Prob. 40.66CPCh. 40 - Prob. 40.67PPCh. 40 - Prob. 40.68PPCh. 40 - Prob. 40.69PPCh. 40 - Prob. 40.70PP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Is it possible to measure energy of 0.75h for a quantum harmonic oscillator? Why? Why not? Explain.arrow_forwardHi there, I would just like to ask the Copenhagen interpretation of Light that is both as a particle and a wave and would like to verify if I understand it right. So basically Light exists as both a particle and a wave but we'll only know what state it is in when we test it or we won't know what state it will be unless we open the box (in reference to Schrodingers thought experiment). Because before diving to the quantum mechanics interpretation of light, I thought of it as a particle moving in a wave but since both cannot exist at the same time or at least it would bend our understanding of the two. I would like to receive some enlightenment thank you!arrow_forward. Is it possible for the de Broglie wavelength of a “particle”to be greater than the dimensions of the particle? To besmaller? Is there any direct connection? Explain.arrow_forward
- B6arrow_forwardFor a particle in a box, what would the probability distribution function Ic I2 look like if the particle behaved like a classical (Newtonian) particle? Do the actual probability distributions approach this classical form when n is very large? Explain.arrow_forwardAre the following phenomena wave or particle behaviors? Give your reasoning. (a) Television picture, (b) rainbows, (c) football sailing between goal posts, (d) telescope observing the moon, (e) police radararrow_forward
- 4. For parts a, b, c state whether the given wavefunction is admissible or not and justify your answer. (a) Given y (x, t) = Cei(kx-wt) + Cze-i(kx+wt) with C1 and C2 complex numbers and k real. (b) Given 4 (x, t) = A cos(@t) e-blal with A and b real, and b > 0. (c) Given (x, t) = Ce-iwte-alx| for -o 0. (d) Sketch the probability density associated with the wavefunction p(x, t) defined in part (c).arrow_forwardIn order to solve the Schrödinger equation, one needs to apply boundary conditions. Which of the following best describe what is meant by boundary conditions in this context? The values of the wave function and its time derivative at t=0. The values of the wave function and its spatial derivatives at t=0. The functional form of the potential, V(r). The continuity both the first and second derivatives of the time derivatives. E The continuity of the wave function and its spatial derivatives at a boundary between regions of different potentials, V(r).arrow_forward1) An electron is confined to a square box of length L, and the walls of that box are infinitely high. The zero-point energy (ZPE) is defined as the minimal energy that corresponds to the smallest quantum number n. What would be the length of the box L such that the ZPE of the electron located inside this box is equal to its rest mass energy mec2?arrow_forward
- 1. A particle of mass m is in the state Y(r, t) = Ac 25 = Ac 25 where A and w are positive real constants and i= v-1. For what time-intependent potential energy function V(x) does Y satisfy the Schrödinger equation for a particle of mass m? (Simply plug the Y you are given into the time-dependent Schrödinger equation: h a?¥(x,t) aY(x,t) ih at +V(x)¥(x,t) , 2m take the space and time derivatives and solve for V(x).]arrow_forwardNonearrow_forward2arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern ...PhysicsISBN:9781337553292Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage Learning
University Physics Volume 3PhysicsISBN:9781938168185Author:William Moebs, Jeff SannyPublisher:OpenStax
Modern PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781111794378Author:Raymond A. Serway, Clement J. Moses, Curt A. MoyerPublisher:Cengage Learning
Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern ...
Physics
ISBN:9781337553292
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning
University Physics Volume 3
Physics
ISBN:9781938168185
Author:William Moebs, Jeff Sanny
Publisher:OpenStax
Modern Physics
Physics
ISBN:9781111794378
Author:Raymond A. Serway, Clement J. Moses, Curt A. Moyer
Publisher:Cengage Learning