Concept explainers
Introduction:
A large state college which enrolls close to 20,000 students is SWU. It is known for its football team which falls in top 20 rankings. With the aim of reaching number 1 ranking, Person PF was hired as the head coach in 2009.
The head coach demanded a new stadium and with the increasing attendance and serious financial issues, Dr. J, the president of SWU decided to expand the capacity. Thousand new seats with skyboxes were included. The head coach demanded new dormatorites for the players.
The construction of the stadium was given to Mr. BH with timeline of 270 days after the end of 2015 season and before the start of 2016 season. With the view of completing the project in 250 or 240 days, Mr. BH asked his employees to find ways for crashing the project and the data is given.
To calculate: The probability of finishing the project in 270 days.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 3 Solutions
Principles of Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management (10th Edition)
- Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?arrow_forward
- English Petroleum (EP) has to decide whether or not to drill for oil in a particular place. After its recent disaster in gulf, it has decided to conduct a thorough analysis before venturing into any new exploration projects. An in-house analysis revealed the following information: There are three possible results of drilling: a high yield with NPV $100 million, a moderate yield with NPV $50 million, or no oil. The drilling operation costs $50 million. At similar places, 50%, 30%, and 20% of previous drillings have given high, moderate, or no yield respectively. 1. Should EP drill for oil? What is the expected value associated with the decision. Now suppose a seismic test is available which would indicate a favorable, neutral, or discouraging prospects for the drilling. • There is a 52% chance the test will give favorable results; if it does, the respective probabilities of High, Moderate, or No yield become 35/52, 15/52, and 2/52. • There is a 22% chance the test will give neutral…arrow_forwardSmall City currently has 1,020,000 square feet of office space, of which 765,000 square feet is occupied by 3,000 employees who are mainly involved in professional services such as finance, insurance, and real estate. Small City’s economy has been fairly strong in recent years, but employment growth is expected to be somewhat lower during the next few years, with projections of an increase of just 130 additional employees per year for the next three years. The amount of space per employee is expected to remain the same. However, a new 153,000 square foot office building was started before the recession and its space is expected to become available at the end of the current year (one year from now). No more space is expected to become available after that for quite some time. Required: a. What is the current occupancy rate for office space in Small City? b. How much office space will be absorbed each year for the next three years? c. What will the occupancy rate be at the end of each…arrow_forwardDiHL Co. is a Danao-based logistics company owned by Engr. Donald H. Lalican. Anticipating the growing demand for delivery services, he developed a strategic plan for the year 2022. The options are to hire additional delivery crews in their Mandaue facility, construct a new facility in Talisay City, or subcontract Ohlala Move, a small-time company. A study conducted by the marketing department forecasted the following payoff values, which are summarized in the table below. The values are expressed as gains and alpha = 0.6. *a.) Which decision alternative has a minimum payoff value from the maximum regrets?b.) Which realism approach decision alternative has maximum payoff? c.) Which equally likely decision alternative has the best payoff value?arrow_forward
- DiHL Co. is a Danao-based logistics company owned by Engr. Donald H. Lalican. Anticipating the growing demand for delivery services, he developed a strategic plan for the year 2022. The options are to hire additional delivery crews in their Mandaue facility, construct a new facility in Talisay City, or subcontract Ohlala Move, a small-time company. A study conducted by the marketing department forecasted the following payoff values, which are summarized in the table below. The values are expressed as gains and alpha = 0.6. *What is the best decision alternative under Maximax criterion? (Provide complete decision table solution)arrow_forwardwhat is the center of gravity method and how is it usedarrow_forwardPlease answer the question listed below! Thanks!arrow_forward
- CRUISE MINI CASE: Sunshine Cruise Lines is a cruise operator that offers three- to seven-day cruises along five Caribbean routes. It has developed a reputation as a party cruise operator and the majority of its revenue comes from vacationing college students. This type of customer demand is highly cyclical, and Sunshine finds that repeat purchase is high while its consumers are in college, but practically disappears after graduation. In an effort to encourage its customers to continue taking Sunshine Cruises after they have graduated, the cruise operator has begun offering Adventure Cruises, with port stops on islands known for eco-tourism and biodiversity, both on land and off shore, appealing to young professionals who like to hike and scuba dive or snorkel. In contrast to its party cruises, Sunshine focuses its marketing message for Adventure Cruises on activities at port stops and the convenience of being able to explore several Caribbean destinations from the comfort of a single…arrow_forwardProblem 17 page 552The chancellor of a small regional college is concernedabout the declining freshman enrollment at his college. A number of factors have contributed to the decline, butthe chancellor believes it is directly related to annualtuition increases. He has collected the following data forthe past 8 years.year FreshmanEnrollmentAnnualTuition (In USdollars)1 6,550 32,0002 6,230 37,0003 5,980 45,2004 5,540 45,7005 4,960 46,2006 4,630 46,7007 4,520 52,2008 4,220 57,700a Develop a linear regression equation for forecastingfreshman enrollment as a function of the annual tuition.b Forecast freshman enrollment if the annual tuitionincreases by US$9,000 in Year 9.c Evaluate the "goodness of fit" of the regressionequation by computing the values of R2, r, and Syx and interpret the results.arrow_forwardPart Darrow_forward
- Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning