(a)
Whether higher levels of education for women will lead to an increase or decrease in the
Explanation of Solution
The opportunity cost for a mother who chooses/decides not to work outside the home will be high if there are higher levels of education for women. This is because higher levels of education will ensure higher earnings for the women, thus the amount of earnings forgone by staying at home will increase for mothers, thus increased opportunity costs.
Introduction:
Opportunity costs is the cost in terms of forgone benefit that a person could have received by choosing an alternative course of action.
(b)
Whether higher
Explanation of Solution
If the unemployment rates are higher, then there will be a decline in the opportunity costs for staying at home. Higher unemployment rates will mean lesser opportunity of getting a job, and therefore lower opportunity cost.
Introduction:
Opportunity costs is the cost in terms of forgone benefit that a person could have received by choosing an alternative course of action.
(c)
Whether higher average pay levels for women will lead to an increase or decrease in the opportunity costs for mothers who decide not to work outside the home.
Explanation of Solution
The opportunity cost for forgoing job opportunities for staying at home will be higher if the average earnings of the women are higher as they will have to forgo higher amount of money.
Introduction:
Opportunity costs is the cost in terms of forgone benefit that a person could have received by choosing an alternative course of action
(d)
Whether lower demand for labor in industries that traditionally employ women will lead to an increase or decrease in the opportunity costs for mothers who decide not to work outside the home.
Explanation of Solution
Lower demand for labor in industries that traditionally employ women will imply lower chances for women to get a job in the industry. Since they will not be able to get a job, the opportunity cost for staying at home is decreases in comparison to working.
Introduction:
Opportunity costs is the cost in terms of forgone benefit that a person could have received by choosing an alternative course of action.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- Don't used Ai solutionarrow_forwardThe preferences of a consumer are represented by the following utility function: U = min (×1, 2x2) If income is 100 and p1=p2=1 a) What is the optimal bundle? b) If p₁=4, what is the new optimal bundle? c) If p2=4, what is the new optimal bundle? d) Decompose the price effect into income and substitution effect and provide a graphical representation of your results.arrow_forwardChallenges of Nepal's foreign trade.arrow_forward
- General Accounting Question solution and give me Blank ? Carrow_forwardIt is possible to use transformational leadership strategies to reach unethical objectives. Traditional leadership theories and morals standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues. For the statement above, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statements.arrow_forwardDiscuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forward
- answerarrow_forwardDiscuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax