(a)
The applicable interest rates for a sum of $160 if it is to become $170 in one year’s time and if it was $150 a year ago.
(a)
Answer to Problem 10P
The applicable interest rate for a sum of $160 if it is to become $170 in one year’s time is 6.6%.
The applicable interest rates for a sum of money that was worth $150 one year ago to become $170 in one year’s time is 6.25%
Explanation of Solution
Next, the first square root of 1.0666 must be calculated in order to find the value of ‘r’.
Next, the same equation would be used to calculate the
The next step involves in calculating the first square root of 1.0625 in order to derive the value of ‘r’.
Both the interest rates for the past year and the year ahead must be derived by using the future value equation. In the first equation, the future value would be $160 and the present value, $150. As the interest rate is being calculated for a period of one year, the “n” value becomes one. Solving the equation, the final answer would be 6.6%. In the second equation, the present value is $160 and the future value is $170. Further, the timespan involved is again one year, making the “n” value one. The answer would be 6.25%.
Introduction:
As money has a value that changes with the passage of time, calculating the rate of interest is essential in the field of investments. It is said to be the income received for amounts lent. The value of a certain amount of money today will not be the same in one year’s time or one year ago. Hence, the interest rate is helpful in bringing these values to a common platform.
(b)
The interest rate applicable for a sum of $150 invested one year from today, that would become $170 one year from today.
(b)
Answer to Problem 10P
The interest rate applicable for a sum of $150 invested one year from today that would become $170 one year from today is 6.4%.
Explanation of Solution
Next, the second square root of 1.133 should be found in order to determine the value of ‘r’.
As the amount of $150 has been invested one year ago and shall be grown into $170 one year from now, the total timespan involved would be two years. The sum is done with the standpoint that $150 would be invested today, to be grown into $170 in two years. When solved, the applicable interest rate would be 6.4%
Introduction:
Time value of money is the reason why interest is being calculated for moneys that are invested over a span of time. If one invests a particular amount of money today, the future value of that amount would either appreciate or
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 3 Solutions
ENGINEERING ECONOMIC ENHANCED EBOOK
- answerarrow_forwardDiscuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- For the statement below, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statement. Incompetent leaders can't be ethical leaders. Traditional leadership theories and moral standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues.arrow_forwardpresentation on "Dandelion Insomnia." Poemarrow_forwardDon't used Ai solutionarrow_forward
- "Whether the regulator sells or gives away tradeable emission permits free of charge, the quantities of emissions produced by firms are the same." Assume that there are n identical profit-maximising firms where profit for each firm is given by π(e) with л'(e) > 0; π"(e) < 0 and e denotes emissions. Individual emissions summed over all firms gives E which generates environmental damages D(E). Show that the regulator achieves the optimal level of total pollution through a tradeable emission permit scheme, where the permits are distributed according to the following cases: Case (i) the firm purchases all permits; Case (ii) the firm receives all permits free; and Page 3 of 5 ES30031 Case (iii) the firm purchases a portion of its permits and receives the remainder free of charge.arrow_forwardcompare and/or contrast the two plays we've been reading, Antigone and A Doll's House.arrow_forwardPlease answer step by steparrow_forward
- Suppose there are two firms 1 and 2, whose abatement costs are given by c₁ (e₁) and C2 (е2), where e denotes emissions and subscripts denote the firm. We assume that c{(e) 0 for i = 1,2 and for any level of emission e we have c₁'(e) # c₂' (e). Furthermore, assume the two firms make different contributions towards pollution concentration in a nearby river captured by the transfer coefficients ε₁ and 2 such that for any level of emission e we have C₂'(e) # The regulator does not know the resulting C₁'(e) Τι environmental damages. Using an analytical approach explain carefully how the regulator may limit the concentration of pollution using (i) a Pigouvian tax scheme and (ii) uniform emissions standards. Discuss the cost-effectiveness of both approaches to control pollution.arrow_forwardBill’s father read that each year a car’s value declines by 10%. He also read that a new car’s value declines by 12% as it is driven off the dealer’s lot. Maintenance costs and the costs of “car problems” are only $200 per year during the 2-year warranty period. Then they jump to $750 per year, with an annual increase of $500 per year.Bill’s dad wants to keep his annual cost of car ownership low. The car he prefers cost $30,000 new, and he uses an interest rate of 8%. For this car, the new vehicle warranty is transferrable.(a) If he buys the car new, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(b) If he buys the car after it is 2 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(c) If he buys the car after it is 4 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(d) If he buys the car after it is 6 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(e) What strategy do you recommend? Why? Please show each step and formula,…arrow_forwardO’Leary Engineering Corp. has been depreciating a $50,000 machine for the last 3 years. The asset was just sold for 60% of its first cost. What is the size of the recaptured depreciation or loss at disposal using the following depreciation methods?(a) Straight-line with N = 8 and S = 2000(b) Double declining balance with N = 8(c) 40% bonus depreciation with the balance using 7-year MACRS Please show every step and formula, don't use excel. The answer should be (a) $2000 loss, (b) $8000 deo recap, (c) $14257 dep recap, thank you.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education