To use the Minitab output to estimate each parameter in this multiple regression model for predicting calories burned with the Cybex machine and estimate σ .

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 28, Problem 28.41E

(a)

To determine

To use the Minitab output to estimate each parameter in this multiple regression model for predicting calories burned with the Cybex machine and estimate σ .

(a)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 28.41E

Calories=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01 Ind_slow−145.06 NoIncline−72.83 2%Incline .

Explanation of Solution

In the question, it is given that,

Ind_slow=1 for MPH≤3Ind_slow=0 for MPH>3NonIncline=1 for 0%inclineNonIncline=0 for other inclines2%Incline=1 for 0%incline2%Incline=0 for other inclines

And a Minitab output is shown fitting a multiple regression model to predict calories form MPH, Ind_slow, NoIncline and 2% Incline for a man.

Thus, the parameter in this multiple regression model for predicting calories burned with the Cybex machine can be modeled as, from the output Minitab:

Calories=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01 Ind_slow−145.06 NoIncline−72.83 2%Incline

And the estimated σ is from the Minitab as:

s=34.2865 .

(b)

To determine

To find out how many separate lines are fitted with this model and explain do the lines all have the same slope and identify each fitted line.

(b)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 28.41E

There are eight separate lines that are fitted with this model and no, all the lines do not have the same slope.

Explanation of Solution

In the question, it is given that,

Ind_slow=1 for MPH≤3Ind_slow=0 for MPH>3NonIncline=1 for 0%inclineNonIncline=0 for other inclines2%Incline=1 for 0%incline2%Incline=0 for other inclines

And a Minitab output is shown fitting a multiple regression model to predict calories form MPH, Ind_slow, NoIncline and 2% Incline for a man.Thus, the parameter in this multiple regression model for predicting calories burned with the Cybex machine can be modeled as, from the output Minitab:

Calories=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01 Ind_slow−145.06 NoIncline−72.83 2%Incline

Now, there are eightseparate lines that are fitted with this model and no,all the lines do not have the same slope because as we see in the Minitab output for this model and all the slopes are different. The lines that are fitted with this model are as follows:

Calories=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01 Ind_slow−145.06 NoIncline−72.83 2%Incline=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01(0)−145.06(1)−72.83(1)=−153.14+145.841MPH

Calories=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01 Ind_slow−145.06 NoIncline−72.83 2%Incline=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01(0)−145.06(0)−72.83(1)=−8.08+145.841MPH

Calories=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01 Ind_slow−145.06 NoIncline−72.83 2%Incline=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01(0)−145.06(0)−72.83(0)=64.75+145.841MPH

Calories=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01 Ind_slow−145.06 NoIncline−72.83 2%Incline=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01(0)−145.06(1)−72.83(0)=−80.31+145.841MPH

Calories=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01 Ind_slow−145.06 NoIncline−72.83 2%Incline=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01(1)−145.06(1)−72.83(1)=−203.15+145.841MPH

Calories=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01 Ind_slow−145.06 NoIncline−72.83 2%Incline=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01(1)−145.06(0)−72.83(1)=−58.09+145.841MPH

Calories=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01 Ind_slow−145.06 NoIncline−72.83 2%Incline=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01(1)−145.06(0)−72.83(0)=14.74+145.841MPH

Calories=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01 Ind_slow−145.06 NoIncline−72.83 2%Incline=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01(1)−145.06(1)−72.83(0)=−130.32+145.841MPH

(c)

To determine

To explain do you think that this model provides a good fit for these data.

(c)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 28.41E

Yes, this model provides a good fit for these data.

Explanation of Solution

In the question, it is given that,

Ind_slow=1 for MPH≤3Ind_slow=0 for MPH>3NonIncline=1 for 0%inclineNonIncline=0 for other inclines2%Incline=1 for 0%incline2%Incline=0 for other inclines

And a Minitab output is shown fitting a multiple regression model to predict calories form MPH, Ind_slow, NoIncline and 2% Incline for a man. Thus, the parameter in this multiple regression model for predicting calories burned with the Cybex machine can be modeled as, from the output Minitab:

Calories=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01 Ind_slow−145.06 NoIncline−72.83 2%Incline

Since the R2=99.3% that means 99.3% of the variation is explained by the MPH in the model and that is why this model provides a good fit for these data.

(d)

To determine

To explain is there significant that more calories are burned for higher speeds and state the hypotheses and identify the test statistics and P-value and provide a conclusion.

(d)

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 28.41E

Yes, there is significant that more calories are burned for higher speeds and P-value is zero and F=1819.18 .

Explanation of Solution

In the question, it is given that,

Ind_slow=1 for MPH≤3Ind_slow=0 for MPH>3NonIncline=1 for 0%inclineNonIncline=0 for other inclines2%Incline=1 for 0%incline2%Incline=0 for other inclines

And a Minitab output is shown fitting a multiple regression model to predict calories form MPH, Ind_slow, NoIncline and 2% Incline for a man. Thus, the parameter in this multiple regression model for predicting calories burned with the Cybex machine can be modeled as, from the output Minitab:

Calories=64.75+145.841MPH−50.01 Ind_slow−145.06 NoIncline−72.83 2%Incline

The hypothesis will be defined as:

Null hypothesis: There is no significant difference between them.

Alternative hypothesis: There is significant evidence that more calories are burned for higher speeds.

Since we can see that the P-value is zero i.e. P<0.05⇒Reject H0 . Thus, we can conclude that we have sufficient evidence to show that there is significant that more calories are burned for higher speeds. The test statistics value is F=1819.18 .

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Can you help me solve problem 38 with steps im stuck.

How do the samples hold up to the efficiency test? What percentages of the samples pass or fail the test? What would be the likelihood of having the following specific number of efficiency test failures in the next 300 processors tested? 1 failures, 5 failures, 10 failures and 20 failures.

The battery temperatures are a major concern for us. Can you analyze and describe the sample data? What are the average and median temperatures? How much variability is there in the temperatures? Is there anything that stands out? Our engineers’ assumption is that the temperature data is normally distributed. If that is the case, what would be the likelihood that the Safety Zone temperature will exceed 5.15 degrees? What is the probability that the Safety Zone temperature will be less than 4.65 degrees? What is the actual percentage of samples that exceed 5.25 degrees or are less than 4.75 degrees? Is the manufacturing process producing units with stable Safety Zone temperatures? Can you check if there are any apparent changes in the temperature pattern? Are there any outliers? A closer look at the Z-scores should help you in this regard.

Answer 2