Capital rationing decision for a service company involving four proposals
Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows:
The company's capital rationing policy requires a maximum cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum average
Instructions
- 1. Compute the cash payback period for each of the four proposals.
- 2. Giving effect to straight-line
depreciation on the investments and assuming no estimated residual value, compute the average rate of return for each of the four proposals. Round to one decimal place. - 3. Using the following format, summarize the results of your computations in parts (1) and (2). By placing the calculated a mounts in the first two columns on the left and by placing a check mark in the appropriate column to the right, indicate which proposals should be accepted for further analysis and which should be rejected.
- 4. For the proposals accepted for further analysis in part (3), compute the net present value. Use a rate of 15% and the present value of $1 table appearing in this chapter (Exhibit 2).
- 5. Compute the present value index for each of the proposals in part (4). Round to two decimal places.
- 6. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present values of net
cash flows computed in part (4). - 7. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present value indexes computed in part (5).
- 8. Based on the analyses, comment on the relative attractiveness of the proposals ranked in parts (6) and (7).
1.
Cash payback method:
Cash payback period is the expected time period which is required to recover the cost of investment. It is one of the capital investment method used by the management to evaluate the long-term investment (fixed assets) of the business.
Average rate of return method:
Average rate of return is the amount of income which is earned over the life of the investment. It is used to measure the average income as a percent of the average investment of the business, and it is also known as the accounting rate of return.
The average rate of return is computed as follows:
Net present value method:
Net present value method is the method which is used to compare the initial cash outflow of investment with the present value of its cash inflows. In the net present value, the interest rate is desired by the business based on the net income from the investment, and it is also called as the discounted cash flow method.
Present value index:
Present value index is a technique, which is used to rank the proposals of the business. It is used by the management when the business has more investment proposals, and limited fund.
The present value index is computed as follows:
The cash payback period for the given proposals.
Explanation of Solution
The cash payback period for the given proposals is as follows:
Proposal A:
Initial investment=$680,000
Cash payback period of Proposal A | ||||
Year | Net cash flows | Cumulative net cash flows | ||
1 | 200,000 | 200,000 | ||
2 | 200,000 | 400,000 | ||
3 | 200,000 | 600,000 | ||
6 months (1) | 80,000 | 680,000 |
Table (1)
Hence, the cash payback period of proposal A is 3 years and 6 months.
Working note:
Calculate the number of months in the cash payback period:
Proposal B:
Initial investment=$320,000
Cash payback period of Proposal B | ||||
Year | Net cash flows | Cumulative net cash flows | ||
1 | 90,000 | 90,000 | ||
2 | 90,000 | 180,000 | ||
3 | 70,000 | 250,000 | ||
4 | 70,000 | 320,000 |
Table (2)
Hence, the cash payback period of proposal B is 4 years.
Proposal C:
Initial investment=$108,000
Cash payback period of Proposal C | ||||
Year | Net cash flows | Cumulative net cash flows | ||
1 | 55,000 | 55,000 | ||
2 | 53,000 | 108,000 |
Table (3)
Hence, the cash payback period of proposal C is 2 years.
Proposal D:
Initial investment=$400,000
Cash payback period of Proposal D | ||||
Year | Net cash flows | Cumulative net cash flows | ||
1 | 180,000 | 180,000 | ||
2 | 180,000 | 360,000 | ||
3 months (2) | 40,000 | 400,000 | ||
Table (4)
Hence, the cash payback period of proposal D is 2 years and 3 months.
Working note:
Calculate the no. of months in the cash payback period:
2.
The average rate of return for the give proposals.
Explanation of Solution
The average rate of return for the given proposals is as follows:
Proposal A:
Hence, the average rate of return for Proposal A is 14.1%.
Proposal B:
Hence, the average rate of return for Proposal B is 2.5%.
Proposal C:
Hence, the average rate of return for Proposal C is 52.6%.
Proposal D:
Hence, the average rate of return for Proposal D is 30.0%.
3.
To indicate: The proposals which should be accepted for further analysis, and which should be rejected.
Answer to Problem 26.6APR
The proposals which should be accepted for further analysis, and which should be rejected is as follows:
Figure (1)
Explanation of Solution
Proposals A and B are rejected, because proposal A and B fails to meet the required maximum cash back period of 3 years, and they has less rate of return than the other proposals. Hence, Proposals C and D are preferable.
4.
The net present value of preferred proposals.
Explanation of Solution
Calculate the net present value of the proposals which has 12% rate of return as follows:
Proposal C:
Figure (2)
Hence, the net present value of proposal C is $62,067.
Proposal D:
Figure (3)
Hence, the net present value of proposal D is $94,920.
5.
To determine: The present value index for each proposal.
Explanation of Solution
The present value index for each proposal is as follows:
Proposal C:
Calculate the present value index for proposal C:
Hence, the present value index for proposal C is 1.575.
Proposal D:
Calculate the present value index for proposal D:
Hence, the present value index for proposal D is 1.237.
6.
To rank: The proposal from most attractive to least attractive based on the present value of net cash flows.
Explanation of Solution
Proposals are arranged by rank is as follows:
Proposals | Net present value | Rank |
Proposal D | $ 94,920 | 1 |
Proposal C | $ 62,067 | 2 |
Table (5)
7.
To rank: The proposal from most attractive to least attractive based on the present value of index.
Explanation of Solution
Proposals are arranged by rank is as follows:
Proposals | Present value index | Rank |
Proposal C | 1.57 | 1 |
Proposal D | 1.24 | 2 |
Table (6)
8.
To analysis: The proposal which is favor to investment, and comment on the relative attractiveness of the proposals based on the rank.
Explanation of Solution
On the basis of net present value:
The net present value of Proposal C is $62,067, and Proposal D is $94,920. In this case, the net present value of proposal D is more than the net present value of proposal C. Hence, investment in Proposal D is preferable.
On the basis of present value index:
The present value index of Proposal C is 1.57, and the present value index of Proposal D is 1.24. In this case, Proposal C has the favorable present value index, because the present value index of Proposal C (1.57) is more than Proposal D (1.24). Thus, the investment in Proposal C is preferable (favorable).
Every business tries to get maximum profit with minimum investment. Hence, the cost of investment in Proposal C is less than the proposal D. Thus, investment in Proposal C is preferable.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 26 Solutions
Working Papers, Chapters 1-17 for Warren/Reeve/Duchac's Accounting, 26th and Financial Accounting, 14th
- Capital rationing decision involving four proposals Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: The company’s capital rationing policy requires a maximum cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum average rate of return of 12% is required on allprojects. 1f the preceding standards are met, the net present value method and presentvalue indexes are used to rank the remaining proposals. Instructions Compute the present value index for each oldie proposals in part (4). Round to two decimal places.arrow_forwardCash payback period for a service company Janes Clothing Inc. is evaluating two capital investment proposals for a retail outlet, each requiring an investment of 975,000 and each with a seven-year life and expected total net cash flows of 1,050,000. Location 1 is expected to provide equal annual net cash flows of 150,000, and Location 2 is expected to have the following unequal annual net cash flows: Determine the cash payback period for both location proposals.arrow_forwardThere are two projects under consideration by the Rainbow factory. Each of the projects will require an initial investment of $35,000 and is expected to generate the following cash flows: Use the information from the previous exercise to calculate the internal rate of return on both projects and make a recommendation on which one to accept. For further instructions on internal rate of return in Excel, see Appendix C.arrow_forward
- Project S has a cost of $10,000 and is expected to produce benefits (cash flows) of $3,000 per year for 5 years. Project L costs $25,000 and is expected to produce cash flows of $7,400 per year for 5 years. Calculate the two projects’ NPVs, IRRs, MIRRs, and PIs, assuming a cost of capital of 12%. Which project would be selected, assuming they are mutually exclusive, using each ranking method? Which should actually be selected?arrow_forwardAverage rate of return method, net present value method, and analysis for a service company The capital investment committee of Arches Landscaping Company is considering two capital investments. The estimated operating income and net cash flows from each investment are as follows: Each project requires an investment of 75,000. Straight-line depreciation will be used, and no residual value is expected. The committee has selected a rate of 12% for purposes of the net present value analysis. Instructions 1. Compute the following: A. The average rate of return for each investment. B. The net present value for each investment. Use the present value table appearing in Exhibit 2 of this chapter. (Round present values to the nearest dollar.) 2. Prepare a brief report for the capital investment committee, advising it on the relative merits of the two investments.arrow_forwardNet present value method, internal rate of return method, and analysis for a service company The management of Advanced Alternative Power Inc. is considering two capital investment projects. The estimated net cash flows from each project are as follows: The wind turbines require an investment of 887,600, while the biofuel equipment requires an investment of 911,100. No residual value is expected from either project. Instructions 1. Compute the following for each project: A. The net present value. Use a rate of 6% and the present value of an annuity table appearing in Exhibit 5 of this chapter. B. A present value index. (Round to two decimal places.) 2. Determine the internal rate of return for each project by (A) computing a present value factor for an annuity of 1 and (B) using the present value of an annuity of 1 table appearing in Exhibit 5 of this chapter. 3. What advantage does the internal rate of return method have over the net present value method in comparing projects?arrow_forward
- Net present value method, present value index, and analysis for a service company First United Bank Inc. is evaluating three capital investment projects by using the net present value method. Relevant data related to the projects are summarized as follows: Instructions 1. Assuming that the desired rate of return is 15%, prepare a net present value analysis for each project. Use the present value table appearing in Exhibit 2 of this chapter. 2. Determine a present value index for each project. (Round to two decimal places.) 3. Which project offers the largest amount of present value per dollar of investment? Explain.arrow_forwardStaten Corporation is considering two mutually exclusive projects. Both require an initial outlay of 150,000 and will operate for five years. The cash flows associated with these projects are as follows: Statens required rate of return is 10%. Using the net present value method and the present value table provided in Appendix A, which of the following actions would you recommend to Staten? a. Accept Project X and reject Project Y. b. Accept Project Y and reject Project X. c. Accept Projects X and Y. d. Reject Projects X and Y.arrow_forwardThere are two projects under consideration by the Rainbow factory. Each of the projects will require an initial investment of $35,000 and is expected to generate the following cash flows: If the discount rate is 12%, compute the NPV of each project.arrow_forward
- There are two projects under consideration by the Rainbow factory. Each of the projects will require an initial investment or $28.000 and is expected to generate the following cash flows: If the discount rate is 5% compute the NPV of each project and make a recommendation of the project to be chosen.arrow_forwardUsing capital rationing to make capital investment decisions Mountain Manufacturing is considering the following capital investment proposals. Mountains requirement criteria include a maximum payback period of five years and a required rate of return of 12.5%. Determine if each investment is acceptable or should be rejected (ignore qualitative factors). Rank the acceptable investments in order from most desirable to least desirable.arrow_forward(a)Evaluate the projects using each of the following criteria, stating which project(s) Insignia Corporation Limited should choose under each criteria and why: Payback Discounted Payback Net Present Value Profitability Indexarrow_forward
- Survey of Accounting (Accounting I)AccountingISBN:9781305961883Author:Carl WarrenPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337912020Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. TaylerPublisher:South-Western College PubFinancial And Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337902663Author:WARREN, Carl S.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
- EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTFinanceISBN:9781337514835Author:MOYERPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENTPrinciples of Accounting Volume 2AccountingISBN:9781947172609Author:OpenStaxPublisher:OpenStax CollegeIntermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course...FinanceISBN:9781337395083Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. DavesPublisher:Cengage Learning