MindTap Business Law, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card for Cross/Miller's The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases, 10th (MindTap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337093842
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 25, Problem 1BS
Summary Introduction
Case summary: A company F processes a soft drink called FU. The company uses special acid to clean the returnable bottle for further processing. The acid is diluted and then passed into a navigable stream. Also, broken bottles are crushed and are thrown into the stream.
To find : The violation of environmental laws by the company F.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Nevada passes a statute that any 18-wheel truck passing through Nevada must meet a Clean Fuel Fleet Exhaust Emission Standard of no more than 2.8 nitrous oxide (NOx). The federal statute requirement for such trucks is no more than 3.8 NOx. Carlton is driving his 18-wheeler cross-country to deliver a load and stops at a Nevada weigh station. The weigh station officer inspects Carlton’s documents, notes that Carlton’s truck has a 3.4 NOx emission level, and issues a citation. On what grounds might Carlton fight this citation?
Discuss the legal principles which apply to the following business situations:
a) A council officer advises a motorist that parking in a particular street is permitted. In fact, the street is a clearway with no parking permitted and the motorist’s car is towed away and a substantial fine imposed.
b) A food manufacturer is warned by a radical political group that ground glass has been placed in certain cans of baked beans. Treating the warning as a prank, the manufacturer does nothing, but a consumer is injured when eating beans from a can which has been tampered with.
Over the years, the Red Cross has been guided in its use of donations by honoring donor intent. This policy helped the organization deal with a major ethical challenge after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The Red Cross received more than $1 billion in donations and initially diverted some money to ancillary operations, such as creating a strategic blood reserve. After donors objected, however, the organization reversed its decision and – honoring donor intent – used the contributions to directly benefit people affected by the tragedy. Should the American Red Cross have reversed its initial decision to divert some of the money donated for September 11 relief efforts to pressing but ancillary operations? Support your chosen position.
Chapter 25 Solutions
MindTap Business Law, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card for Cross/Miller's The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases, 10th (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Pollution remediation obligations should be recognized if which of the following obligating events has occurred? Multiple Choice A violation of a pollution prevention permit has occurred. All of the given items are obligating events that would require recognition of a pollution remediation obligation. The government is compelled to take remediation action due to imminent endangerment to the public health. The government is named or will be named as the responsible or potentially responsible party to a remediation.arrow_forwardhow electrical company cares for its employees, customers, suppliers, the community where it does business, and beyond. Describe its green initiatives and care for the environment, its philanthropic initiatives, and whether it does or does not adhere to laws where it does business, considering ethics and lawful behaviour, its history, and any pending litigation (lawsuits).arrow_forwardExplain the National Environmental Policy Act (1970).arrow_forward
- Anthem, one of the largest healthcare insurers in the United States, implemented an“avoidable ER” policy to help manage the care of its enrollees. The policy stated thatAnthem would not pay for emergency room visits if the company determined that the visitwas not necessary. The policy, which was instituted in six states beginning in 2015, wasmeant to encourage patients to seek care in appropriate settings. However, providers feelthat this policy might cause patients to avoid emergency treatment, even when it isnecessary. In response to customer and provider complaints, Anthem created severalexceptions: Claims will be covered if a healthcare provider tells a patient to go to theemergency room, if the patient is under 15 years of age, if the patient is outside his or her state of residence, and if the patient had a CT scan or MRI or underwent surgery. Still,providers are unhappy with the policy (Livingston 2018).How is this policy an example of managed care?arrow_forwardAnthem, one of the largest healthcare insurers in the United States, implemented an“avoidable ER” policy to help manage the care of its enrollees. The policy stated thatAnthem would not pay for emergency room visits if the company determined that the visitwas not necessary. The policy, which was instituted in six states beginning in 2015, wasmeant to encourage patients to seek care in appropriate settings. However, providers feelthat this policy might cause patients to avoid emergency treatment, even when it isnecessary. In response to customer and provider complaints, Anthem created severalexceptions: Claims will be covered if a healthcare provider tells a patient to go to theemergency room, if the patient is under 15 years of age, if the patient is outside his or her state of residence, and if the patient had a CT scan or MRI or underwent surgery. Still,providers are unhappy with the policy (Livingston 2018).1-Why did Anthem implement this policy?arrow_forwardThe United States Department of Transportation regulates that certain employees engaged in oil and gas pipeline operations are required to submit to random drug testing. The employee does not have to be suspected of drug use before being tested. Review the documents found at https://www.transportation.gov/odapc. If the employees challenge this rule in court, will the rule be upheld? What is a police state? If the United States were a police state, privacy and other rights that we often take for granted could be commonplace and easily justified in the interest of security. If that were the situation, would a case like this one have even come before a court? What is a safety sensitive position? Why are these positions highly regulated? What advantages are there to an employer to use basic principles of fairness in investigating and disciplining employees? Do you think that employees who feel that they are being treated fairly will likely be more productive and more loyal than employees…arrow_forward
- For the scenario below, determine the legality of the company's actions. Ioncorp sells cabinets nationwide to the furniture company Blinkorp. It makes an agreement that Blinkorp will only sell Ioncorp cabinets in its warehouses. Strictly illegal Legal Illegal, depending on impactarrow_forwardThe Endangered Species Act (ESA) charges the National Marine Fisheries Service (a federal agency) with the duty to “ensure” that any proposed action by the council does not “jeopardize” any threatened or endangered species. The Steller sea lion is on the list of endangered species. The agency developed a North Pacific marine fishery plan that permitted a significant harvest of fish by commercial fisheries in the area. Greenpeace, an environmental group, challenged the agency on the grounds that the plan was not based on a sufficient number of biological studies on the impact of the allowed fishing on the Steller sea lion. Greenpeace’s biologic opinion concluded that the fishery plan would reduce the level of food for the sea lions by about 40% to 60% if the juvenile fish were not counted in that figure. Greenpeace’s expert maintained that counting juvenile fish was misleading because they were not capable of reproducing and the government agency’s figure was, as a result, much lower at…arrow_forwardYuri created a very unique service offered by her company. Her company dubs lesson and speeches to any language for political persons and resource speaker. In order to protect her company from unfair competition what type of intellectual property should Yuri apply for? Yuri should apply for copyright P so that no one can published their service without their permission Yuri should apply for industrial design to protect the ornamental shape of their product Yuri should apply for geographical origin since product came from their home town Yuri should apply for service mark in order to protect her company from unfair competitionarrow_forward
- ANTHEM’S AVOIDABLE EMERGENCY ROOM POLICYAnthem, one of the largest healthcare insurers in the United States, implemented an“avoidable ER” policy to help manage the care of its enrollees. The policy stated thatAnthem would not pay for emergency room visits if the company determined that the visitwas not necessary. The policy, which was instituted in six states beginning in 2015, wasmeant to encourage patients to seek care in appropriate settings. However, providers feelthat this policy might cause patients to avoid emergency treatment, even when it isnecessary. In response to customer and provider complaints, Anthem created severalexceptions: Claims will be covered if a healthcare provider tells a patient to go to theemergency room, if the patient is under 15 years of age, if the patient is outside his or her state of residence, and if the patient had a CT scan or MRI or underwent surgery. Still,providers are unhappy with the policy (Livingston 2018). What other solutions could be used…arrow_forwardCharter of Rights and Freedoms In 1988, the federal government introduced a legislation, Tobacco Products Control Act, created in complete and total prohibition on all advertising and promotion of tobacco products in Canada. The act also required a health warning of a specific nature to be put on tobacco packaging and prohibited the manufacturers from putting any other information on those packages. The manufacturer challenged the legislation before the Supreme Court claiming that it interfered with the manufacturer’s right to freedom of expression section 2 (b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 1) Do Supreme Court has legal right to interpret the legislated law? 2) Does law infringe the freedom of expression of the charter? Please state your reasons.arrow_forwardDescribe the constitution of Canada's division of powers and how it relates to environmental legislation. Describe the sources and boundaries of each level of government's jurisdiction and authority with regard to environmental law (Canada).arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education