Case summary:In this case, a person M hired a fire safety consultancy OFP, owned by the person D for the disposal of insulation from his building. D and M's employees were aware of the fact that the insulation contains asbestos but they did not have a license for its removal. Ignoring this fact, they completed the work by dumping the hazardous substance at certain places which resulted in the cleaning cost of $50,000. The court convicted M for the violation of the Clean Air Act and he was sentenced an imprisonment for 120 months as well as fine.
To find:The results if M had the license for removing asbestos.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Chapter 25 Solutions
MindTap Business Law, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card for Cross/Miller's The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases, 10th (MindTap Course List)
- Can you solve this financial accounting problem with appropriate steps and explanations?arrow_forwardCan you solve this general accounting question with accurate accounting calculations?arrow_forwardIn 2019, Philip Industries sold 3,800 units at $275 each. Variable costs were $195 per unit, and fixed costs were $120,000. What was Philip Industries' 2019 net income?arrow_forward
