Case summary : The company LI sells the only style of catridge which works with the company’s printer. The other companies acquired the used cartridges and refurbished them to sell them in competition with LI. The company offered a twenty percent discount to customers if they returned the used cartridges of the company. The company SSC was involved in making and selling of the remanufactured cartridges. LI released an advertisement to claim that the products sold by the company are violating the patent rights of LI. A legal suit was filed by LI in federal district court for violation of the intellectual property right. The company SSC countered the claim by alleging that the company LI did false advertisement. The counterclaim was dismissed and the court ordered that company SSC had no right to sue the company LI. Company SSC appealed to the appellate court. The appellate court reversed the decision. The company LI appealed to the supreme court and won.
To find: Whether SSC is entitled to relief under the court’s ruling.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution- You are required to use the IRAC model to answer all questions. What are the Issues- What are the Laws on the Issues – Application of the Law to the Issue- Analysis – Conclusion – Question 1 Robert entered into an agreement with Best Foods Limited to purchase 100 pounds of chicken. However, Robert signed the contract without reading its contents. The contract contained an exclusion clause, which expressly omitted all his rights under the Sale of Goods Act. Robert collected the chicken from Best Foods, which unknown to him was tainted, regrettably he did not observe that fact and immediately refrigerated the chicken. A few days later, 10 pounds of chicken was taken out of the freezer and cooked. Consequently, the entire family had to be hospitalized due to medical complications which was suspected to be caused by the decay of the frozen chicken. Robert’s attorney wrote Best Foods Limited threatening legal action for the sale of the tainted chicken. However, Best Foods is…arrow_forwardYou are required to use the IRAC model to answer all questions. What are the Issues- What are the Laws on the Issues – Application of the Law to the Issue- Analysis – Conclusion – Question 1 Robert entered into an agreement with Best Foods Limited to purchase 100 pounds of chicken. However, Robert signed the contract without reading its contents. The contract contained an exclusion clause, which expressly omitted all his rights under the Sale of Goods Act. Robert collected the chicken from Best Foods, which unknown to him was tainted, regrettably he did not observe that fact and immediately refrigerated the chicken. A few days later, 10 pounds of chicken was taken out of the freezer and cooked. Consequently, the entire family had to be hospitalized due to medical complications which was suspected to be caused by the decay of the frozen chicken. Robert’s attorney wrote Best Foods Limited threatening legal action for the sale of the tainted chicken. However, Best Foods is…arrow_forwardTypically what are the sections of an IS policy.arrow_forward
- Need a long and detailed self-explanatory analysis of the following case after hearing the oral argument of the case in Oyez Bank of America Corp. v. City of Miamiarrow_forwardA dentai OTTice aoesn't have accessible parking spots. When a patient with mobility challenges complains, the receptionist tells him that because the office is not bound by the Fair Housing Act, the office is not required to have accessible parking spots. Did the receptionist respond correctly? Yes. The receptionist is correct that the office is not covered by the Fair Housing Act, which only covers residential housing. She was not required by any law to provide the patient with accessible parking. Yes. Disability is not a protected class under any federal law. No. A dental office is a public accommodation and therefore covered by the Fair Housing Act, which requires accessibility. No. A dental office is a public accommodation and therefore covered by the ADA. whicharrow_forwardAccording to the case FTC v Standard Education, Question 11 options: The Court advocated a change of standard from the ignorant-consumer standard to the reasonable-person standard The Court set a precedent that unless an advertisement makes a obviously false claim, an advertisement is not deceptive The Court advocated a change of standard from the reasonable-person standard to the gullible-consumer standard The rule of caveat emptor should be the guiding principle in deciding consumer fraud casesarrow_forward
- Title Applying TQM in Manufacturing versus Administration One large company that has been successful in... Description Applying TQM in Manufacturing versus Administration One large company that has been successful in applying Total Quality Management (TQM) principles in manufacturing reports that it has had less success in applying the same techniques in improving administrative functions such as order taking, distribution, and human resources. This company (which has won several quality awards and has significantly improved its product quality) used state-of-theart TQM methods to train all of its employees in how to apply TQM. However, the company has not been able to achieve the same cost reductions and service quality enhancements in administrative areas as it has in the manufacturing area. Assuming that this phenomenon extends to other companies, why do you think that TQM works better in manufacturing than in nonmanufacturing/ service areas?arrow_forwardPLS HELP ASAParrow_forward18. Which of the following is not a per se violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act? Group of answer choices A trade association A price-fixing agreement A market division A group boycottarrow_forward
- For years, Delaney has lived in a house on Shiflet Street that has a 15-foot setback, which was legal when it was built. Zoning regulations changed to now require a 20-foot setback in her neighborhood. Her home isn't hurting anyone, so Delaney was allowed to keep her home the way it is. What is this an example of? illegal nonconforming use special exception legal nonconforming use buffer zoningarrow_forwardTransferring copyrighted music recordings to others, without the copyright owners’authorization, is:a) goodwill.b) a fair use.c) illegal.d) a licensearrow_forwardPls help ASAParrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education