Concept explainers
Case summary: The company KCCC operates coal mines in West Virginia. The US Department of Labor charged the no.1 coal mine of KCCC for “significant and substantial” (S&S) violations of the FMSH Act. There was a potential danger of explosion due to improper sealing of electronic equipment. The violation of the mine act designates that it ‘could significantly and substantially affect and cause safety and health threats. The argument of secretary that ‘Could’ constitutes the mere possibility of threat is hazardous if the violation existed. The company, KCCC filed a lawsuit against the secretary of the Department of Labor to evident the violation.
To find: The deference in the interpretation of the statute by the court.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 23 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
- What is the profit margin if the tax rate is 32 percent?arrow_forwardNova Flex Corp. had net fixed assets of $20,500 at the start of the year and $21,800 at the end. The company recorded $4,200 in depreciation and spent $9,000 on purchasing new fixed assets. How much in fixed assets did Nova Flex Corp. sell during the year?arrow_forwardPlease given correct answer for General accounting question I need step by step explanationarrow_forward
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education