The SEC prohibits insider trading through the statutory provisions only when the monetary benefit is earned by the insider for himself. The SEC decided to amend the law and the action can be brought even when there is no monetary benefit to insiders. The commission did not follow the procedure of rulemaking and simply announced the law. An objection against the law was brought by a stock brokerage firm on the ground that the rule was made without giving any opportunity for public comments. The rule was ultimately challenged before the federal appellate court. To find: The effect of considering the rule merely as an interpretive rule.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 23, Problem 4RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary:The SEC prohibits insider trading through the statutory provisions only when the monetary benefit is earned by the insider for himself. The SEC decided to amend the law and the action can be brought even when there is no monetary benefit to insiders. The commission did not follow the procedure of rulemaking and simply announced the law. An objection against the law was brought by a stock brokerage firm on the ground that the rule was made without giving any opportunity for public comments. The rule was ultimately challenged before the federal appellate court.

To find: The effect of considering the rule merely as an interpretive rule.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Need help this question solution

General accounting

Want to this question answer general Accounting

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 23, Problem 4RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary:The SEC prohibits insider trading through the statutory provisions only when the monetary benefit is earned by the insider for himself. The SEC decided to amend the law and the action can be brought even when there is no monetary benefit to insiders. The commission did not follow the procedure of rulemaking and simply announced the law. An objection against the law was brought by a stock brokerage firm on the ground that the rule was made without giving any opportunity for public comments. The rule was ultimately challenged before the federal appellate court.

To find: The effect of considering the rule merely as an interpretive rule.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 23, Problem 4RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary:The SEC prohibits insider trading through the statutory provisions only when the monetary benefit is earned by the insider for himself. The SEC decided to amend the law and the action can be brought even when there is no monetary benefit to insiders. The commission did not follow the procedure of rulemaking and simply announced the law. An objection against the law was brought by a stock brokerage firm on the ground that the rule was made without giving any opportunity for public comments. The rule was ultimately challenged before the federal appellate court.

To find: The effect of considering the rule merely as an interpretive rule.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 23, Problem 4RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary:The SEC prohibits insider trading through the statutory provisions only when the monetary benefit is earned by the insider for himself. The SEC decided to amend the law and the action can be brought even when there is no monetary benefit to insiders. The commission did not follow the procedure of rulemaking and simply announced the law. An objection against the law was brought by a stock brokerage firm on the ground that the rule was made without giving any opportunity for public comments. The rule was ultimately challenged before the federal appellate court.

To find: The effect of considering the rule merely as an interpretive rule.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 5

Chapter 23, Problem 4RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary:The SEC prohibits insider trading through the statutory provisions only when the monetary benefit is earned by the insider for himself. The SEC decided to amend the law and the action can be brought even when there is no monetary benefit to insiders. The commission did not follow the procedure of rulemaking and simply announced the law. An objection against the law was brought by a stock brokerage firm on the ground that the rule was made without giving any opportunity for public comments. The rule was ultimately challenged before the federal appellate court.

To find: The effect of considering the rule merely as an interpretive rule.

Answer 6

Chapter 23, Problem 4RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary:The SEC prohibits insider trading through the statutory provisions only when the monetary benefit is earned by the insider for himself. The SEC decided to amend the law and the action can be brought even when there is no monetary benefit to insiders. The commission did not follow the procedure of rulemaking and simply announced the law. An objection against the law was brought by a stock brokerage firm on the ground that the rule was made without giving any opportunity for public comments. The rule was ultimately challenged before the federal appellate court.

To find: The effect of considering the rule merely as an interpretive rule.

Answer 7

Chapter 23, Problem 4RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary:The SEC prohibits insider trading through the statutory provisions only when the monetary benefit is earned by the insider for himself. The SEC decided to amend the law and the action can be brought even when there is no monetary benefit to insiders. The commission did not follow the procedure of rulemaking and simply announced the law. An objection against the law was brought by a stock brokerage firm on the ground that the rule was made without giving any opportunity for public comments. The rule was ultimately challenged before the federal appellate court.

To find: The effect of considering the rule merely as an interpretive rule.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 11

Ch. 23 - Assume that the Securities and Exchange Commission...Ch. 23 - Assume that the Securities and Exchange Commission...Ch. 23 - Assume that the Securities and Exchange Commission...Ch. 23 - Prob. 4RE Ch. 23 - Prob. 1IS Ch. 23 - Prob. 2IS Ch. 23 - Prob. 1BS Ch. 23 - Informal Rulemaking. Assume that the Food and Drug...Ch. 23 - Rulemaking. The Investment Company Act prohibits a...Ch. 23 - Prob. 4BCP

Solution Summary: The author explains the effect of considering the rule as an interpretive rule.

Videos

Want to see the full answer?

Chapter 23 Solutions