Case summary: The person LC is working as a professor at the University of Massachusetts’s department of plant, soil and insect sciences. The professor applied in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for permission to register for the production of marijuana for clinical research. He stated that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the usage of marijuana in medical and adequate quality supply. However, an administrative law judge suggested that the application can be granted but the DEA rejected the application. The DEA stated that the professor has to prove that effective control for unapproved purposes of marijuana will be taken and that the competition to supply it is inadequate. The administration noticed that the professor did not prove the above concerns. The professor appealed to the U.S. Court to review the order.
To find: The reasons for which the court should wait until the agency completes its procedural process.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 23 Solutions
Book Title
- Pls help ASAParrow_forwardexamples of landmark case laws where the offer is not clear ?arrow_forward19) The Elle Corporation manufactures fingernail polish. Suzy buys a container of Elle's fingernail polish, applies it to her nails, and suffers a severe allergic reaction. She sues Elle under the implied warranty of merchantability, The test for determining whether Suzy will recover is whether: A) the nail polish she bought was suitable for the needs of the average consumer. B) the nail polish she bought properly performed its function of coloring one's nails. C) such a reaction in an appreciable number of consumers was reasonably foreseeable. D) the ingredient causing the reaction was foreign to the nail polish or natural to it. nating one model, Bobby noticesarrow_forward
- when we thought about legal reasoning we know about legal syllogism, premises apply in general sense, what conclusion might be drawn from these?arrow_forwardThe case of L'Estrange v F Graucob Ltd: Select one: a. Is best known for the legal principles relating to privity of contract b. Is best known for the legal principles relating to conditions and warranties c. Is best known for the legal principles relating to incorporation of terms by signature d. Is best known for the legal principles relating to interpreting exemption clausesarrow_forwardDoes the concept of judicial interpretation of the law mean that judges can make whatever law they wish? And, how can courts remain flexible, if they are required to follow precedent?arrow_forward
- what is the diferences between duty of care and breach of duty?arrow_forwardWhen a party to a lawsuit for breach of contract files pleadings, they must conform to which set of rules? Multiple Choice The Rules of Civil Litigation The Federal Rules of Contracts The Federal Rules of Evidence The Rules of Civil Procedurearrow_forwardState and describe three (3) potentials grounds for overturning an NLRB election.arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education