PROCESS OF SCIENCE In what sense is the Hardy–Weinberg principle a null hypothesis?
To review:
The reason for Hardy-Weinberg principle to be regarded as a null hypothesis.
Introduction:
The Hardy-Weinberg principle is the equilibrium, which states that in a population there are no genetic variations. It means the genetic variation remains constant in a population from one generation to the next generation.
Explanation of Solution
The Hardy-Weinberg principle has five assumptions, namely; random mating, no natural selection, no genetic drift, no mutation, and no gene flow. These assumptions are possible factors in the process of evolution. These factors often contribute to the generation of allele frequencies in a population.
The null hypothesis favors no variation, association, and the relation between the entities taken into account. The Hardy-Weinberg principle is useful for calculating the expected genotype and phenotype frequencies, if no evolutionary process and random mating are occurring. Thus, it is a null hypothesis.
The null hypothesis states that there is no relation and association between the two variables. Hardy-Weinberg principle is a null hypothesis as it follows that no mutation, no gene flow, random mating, and no natural selection is occurring.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 23 Solutions
Biological Science (6th Edition)
- In 3-4 sentences, explain the difference between a null hypothesis and an alternate hypothesis. Then, give an example of each--in other words, make up a null hypothesis and an alternate hypothesis for a hypothetical experiment.arrow_forwardYou are asked to draw and explain the goal of the Meselson-Stahl (1958) Experiment as outlined in the classroom. You need to draw your own diagram and use short sentences to explain the steps and/or important points, deductions. Clearly state what happens at each step.arrow_forwardState whether the following statements are true or false. (a). A hypothesis must be testable and fasifiable. (b). Failure to falsify a hypothesis proves that hypothesis. (C) In the context of science, a law is general and can lead to new testable hypotheses.arrow_forward
- The hypothetico-deductive method in science includes all of the following components except: designing a critical test for the hypothesis, as exemplified by Galileo’s test of falling objects unquestioning acceptance of Platonic Idealism, as practiced by certain medieval Benedictines continuous testing of the hypothesis by further inquiry, as emphasized by Socrates logical deduction (from a universal rule to particular predictions), as emphasized by Aristotle logical induction (from particulars to universals), as emphasized by Platoarrow_forwardwhat is central dogma of biology? Is it entirely accurate?arrow_forwardYou observe that every time your neighbor, who always wears a yellow hat, walks out his front door, he gets dive bombed by a crow. From this observation, what is a testable hypothesis? What is your prediction based on your hypothesis? Please design an experiment to test this hypothesis and prediction. You must identify the independent and dependent variables, as well as at least 2 control variables, and your experiment must contain an experimental group and a control grouparrow_forward
- A well-designed experiment will contain both positive and negative controls. Which of the following is a false statement? Choose one from the following: (A) a positive control experiment is missing some of the components of the experiment and should give a negative result (B) a positive control experiment contains all of the components of an experiment and should give a positive result (C) a negative control experiment is missing the element being tested and should give a negative result (D) if there are multiple components of an experiment, there should be multiple negative controls (E) if a negative control experiment give positives results, it is likely that the experiment is contaminatedarrow_forwardThe hypothetico-deductive method in science includes all of the following components except: logical deduction (from a universal rule to particular predictions), as emphasized by Aristotle designing a critical test for the hypothesis, as exemplified by Galileo’s test of falling objects unquestioning acceptance of Aristotle’s authority, as practiced by late medieval scholastics continuous testing of the hypothesis by further inquiry, as emphasized by Socrates logical induction (from particulars to universals), as emphasized by Platoarrow_forwardCompare and contrast random and systematic experimental errors with specific examples either real or fictitious. Explain how these types of errors can be identified and reduced in an experiment.arrow_forward
- Biology 2eBiologyISBN:9781947172517Author:Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann ClarkPublisher:OpenStaxHuman Heredity: Principles and Issues (MindTap Co...BiologyISBN:9781305251052Author:Michael CummingsPublisher:Cengage Learning