In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen. To find: The validity of H’s claim of US citizenship. The effect on the claim due to his inefficiency in English language.

Question

General accounting

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 22, Problem 7BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To find:The validity of H’s claim of US citizenship. The effect on the claim due to his inefficiency in English language.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain: The change in the visa status of H and the ruling of the appellate court.

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain :The interests of the family member while determining the immigration status of a person by the court.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

General accounting

ANSWER

Teacher of account solve this asap

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 22, Problem 7BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To find:The validity of H’s claim of US citizenship. The effect on the claim due to his inefficiency in English language.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain: The change in the visa status of H and the ruling of the appellate court.

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain :The interests of the family member while determining the immigration status of a person by the court.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 22, Problem 7BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To find:The validity of H’s claim of US citizenship. The effect on the claim due to his inefficiency in English language.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain: The change in the visa status of H and the ruling of the appellate court.

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain :The interests of the family member while determining the immigration status of a person by the court.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 22, Problem 7BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To find:The validity of H’s claim of US citizenship. The effect on the claim due to his inefficiency in English language.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain: The change in the visa status of H and the ruling of the appellate court.

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain :The interests of the family member while determining the immigration status of a person by the court.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 5

Chapter 22, Problem 7BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To find:The validity of H’s claim of US citizenship. The effect on the claim due to his inefficiency in English language.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain: The change in the visa status of H and the ruling of the appellate court.

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain :The interests of the family member while determining the immigration status of a person by the court.

Answer 6

Chapter 22, Problem 7BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To find:The validity of H’s claim of US citizenship. The effect on the claim due to his inefficiency in English language.

Answer 7

Chapter 22, Problem 7BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To find:The validity of H’s claim of US citizenship. The effect on the claim due to his inefficiency in English language.

Answer 8

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain: The change in the visa status of H and the ruling of the appellate court.

Answer 9

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain: The change in the visa status of H and the ruling of the appellate court.

Answer 10

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain :The interests of the family member while determining the immigration status of a person by the court.

Answer 11

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain :The interests of the family member while determining the immigration status of a person by the court.

Answer 12

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 13

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 14

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 15

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 16

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 17

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

Answer 18

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

Answer 19

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

Answer 20

Trending now

Answer 21

This is a popular solution!

Answer 22

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 23

Ch. 22 - Prob. 1RE Ch. 22 - Prob. 2RE Ch. 22 - Prob. 3RE Ch. 22 - Prob. 4RE Ch. 22 - Prob. 1IS Ch. 22 - Prob. 2IS Ch. 22 - Prob. 1BS Ch. 22 - Prob. 2BS Ch. 22 - Prob. 3BCP Ch. 22 - Prob. 4BCP

Solution Summary: The author explains that H's visa status should not be changed because he misrepresented himself as a US citizen and was liable to be deported back.

Chapter 22 Solutions