In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen. To find: The validity of H’s claim of US citizenship. The effect on the claim due to his inefficiency in English language.

Question

Carla is a police officer and a first-generation immigrant. She was assigned to work at a local casino. Carla liked the work and suggested to her brother (in her country of origin) that he come to the United States and work with her to learn English more fluently. The casino rejected his application because of his choppy English. How would you analyze the Immigration Reform and Control Act regarding the casino not hiring Carla's brother because of his choppy English?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 22, Problem 7BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To find:The validity of H’s claim of US citizenship. The effect on the claim due to his inefficiency in English language.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain: The change in the visa status of H and the ruling of the appellate court.

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain :The interests of the family member while determining the immigration status of a person by the court.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Carla is a police officer and a first-generation immigrant. She was assigned to work at a local casino. Carla liked the work and suggested to her brother (in her country of origin) that he come to the United States and work with her to learn English more fluently. The casino rejected his application because of his choppy English. How would you analyze the Immigration Reform and Control Act regarding the casino not hiring Carla's brother because of his choppy English?

3. What protection under human rights law does an individual have who has been denied employment based upon their weight? A) protection based on sex and physical disability B) no protection under human rights law, as being overweight is not a human rights provision C) protection based on physical disability, if it is medically diagnosed as a disability D) a BFOR can be easily established for most job positions that allow for discrimination

Connor applied to be an officer in the Canadian Forces, but his application was denied because of his poor credit rating. He filed a human rights complaint on the basis that the requirement to provide a credit check was discriminatory. Do you think his human rights complaint will be successful?

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 22, Problem 7BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To find:The validity of H’s claim of US citizenship. The effect on the claim due to his inefficiency in English language.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain: The change in the visa status of H and the ruling of the appellate court.

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain :The interests of the family member while determining the immigration status of a person by the court.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 22, Problem 7BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To find:The validity of H’s claim of US citizenship. The effect on the claim due to his inefficiency in English language.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain: The change in the visa status of H and the ruling of the appellate court.

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain :The interests of the family member while determining the immigration status of a person by the court.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 22, Problem 7BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To find:The validity of H’s claim of US citizenship. The effect on the claim due to his inefficiency in English language.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain: The change in the visa status of H and the ruling of the appellate court.

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain :The interests of the family member while determining the immigration status of a person by the court.

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 5

Chapter 22, Problem 7BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To find:The validity of H’s claim of US citizenship. The effect on the claim due to his inefficiency in English language.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain: The change in the visa status of H and the ruling of the appellate court.

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain :The interests of the family member while determining the immigration status of a person by the court.

Answer 6

Chapter 22, Problem 7BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To find:The validity of H’s claim of US citizenship. The effect on the claim due to his inefficiency in English language.

Answer 7

Chapter 22, Problem 7BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To find:The validity of H’s claim of US citizenship. The effect on the claim due to his inefficiency in English language.

Answer 8

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain: The change in the visa status of H and the ruling of the appellate court.

Answer 9

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary:In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain: The change in the visa status of H and the ruling of the appellate court.

Answer 10

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain :The interests of the family member while determining the immigration status of a person by the court.

Answer 11

(c)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: In this case, a charge of misrepresentation was brought against the person H who was a citizen of Pakistan. H entered US in 2002 and two years later signed an I-9 form declaring that he was a US citizen. Later, he married a US citizen. On the case of misrepresentation H testified that he believed that he was a citizen of US and was going to marry a US citizen.

To Explain :The interests of the family member while determining the immigration status of a person by the court.

Answer 12

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 13

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 14

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 15

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 16

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 17

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

Answer 18

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

Answer 19

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

Answer 20

Trending now

Answer 21

This is a popular solution!

Answer 22

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Answer 23

Ch. 22 - Prob. 1RE Ch. 22 - Prob. 2RE Ch. 22 - Prob. 3RE Ch. 22 - Prob. 4RE Ch. 22 - Prob. 1IS Ch. 22 - Prob. 2IS Ch. 22 - Prob. 1BS Ch. 22 - Prob. 2BS Ch. 22 - Prob. 3BCP Ch. 22 - Prob. 4BCP

Solution Summary: The author explains that H's visa status should not be changed because he misrepresented himself as a US citizen and was liable to be deported back.

Chapter 22 Solutions