Case s ummary : Company SDBCH acquired a company SDBC in New York City. At the time of acquisition, company SDBC was in a collateral bargaining agreement with company L, Bakery, Confectionary, tobacco workers, and the union GMIU. Company SDBC at time of the renewal of negotiation agreement refused to give the financial statement to the union GMIU. SDBC did not allow company L to inspect and take notes on the financial statements and offered an opportunity to the union GMIU to make its own copy. To find : The engagement of company SDBC in unfair labor practice.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 22, Problem 5BCP

Summary Introduction

Case s ummary : Company SDBCH acquired a company SDBC in New York City. At the time of acquisition, company SDBC was in a collateral bargaining agreement with company L, Bakery, Confectionary, tobacco workers, and the union GMIU. Company SDBC at time of the renewal of negotiation agreement refused to give the financial statement to the union GMIU. SDBC did not allow company L to inspect and take notes on the financial statements and offered an opportunity to the union GMIU to make its own copy.

To find : The engagement of company SDBC in unfair labor practice.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Mark Young is the head of the painting department in a large hospital; 20 union employees report to him. Before coming on board at the hospital, he had worked as an independent contractor. At the hospital, he took a position that was newly created because the hospital believed change was needed in how painting services were provided. Upon beginning his job, Mark did a 4-month analysis of the direct and indirect costs of painting services. His findings supported the perceptions of his administrators that painting services were inefficient and costly. As a result, Mark completely reorganized the department, designed a new scheduling procedure, and redefined the expected standards of performance. Mark says that when he started out in his new job he was “all task,” like a drill sergeant who didn’t seek any input from his subordinates. From Mark’s point of view, the hospital environment did not leave much room for errors, so he needed to be strict about getting painters to do a good job…

The union (Union) member-employees of the Erie Resistor Company (Company) struck Company over the terms of a new collective bargaining agreement that was being negotiated between Company and Union. Company continued production operations during the strike by hiring new hires and crossover union members who were persuaded to abandon the strike and come back to work. Company promised all replacement workers super seniority. This would take the form of adding twenty years to the length of a worker’s actual service for the purpose of future layoffs and recalls. Many union members accepted the offer. Union filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Is Company’s offer of the super seniority lawful? Explain your answer.

In the Silvestri v. Optus Software, Inc. case, the employment contract contained a 2-year employment agreement with a satisfaction clause. Which of the following was held? A. The satisfaction clause was not enforced, because it was a restraint on trade. B. The satisfaction clause was not enforced, because it was subjective. C. The employer breached the contract and had to pay damages. D. The termination of employment before the 2- year period was enforced.