Concept explainers
(a) The free Cu(I) ion is unstable in solution and has a tendency to disproportionate:
Use the information in Table 19.1 to calculate the equilibrium constant for the reaction. (b) Based on your results in part (a), explain why most Cu(I) compounds are insoluble.
Interpretation:
The equilibrium constant (
) for the given reaction is to be calculated. The reason behind
compounds being insoluble is to be explained.
Concept introduction:
The change in free energy is called Gibb’s free energy and is represented as
If
The standard cell potential can be calculated by the expression as:
The standard Gibbs free energy change is calculated by the expression as:
Here,
is the standard cell potential, and
The equilibrium constant is calculated by the expression as:
The relation between free energy change and standard free energy change is as:
Here,
is the gas constant, and
At equilibrium the above equation is reduced to the expression:
Answer to Problem 79AP
Solution:
a)
b) Stable compounds containing
Explanation of Solution
a) The equilibrium constant for the reaction
From table 19.1, the electrode potential of two half-cell reactions are given as follows:
The Gibbs free energy for first half of the reaction is given as follows:
Substitute
The Gibbs free energy for second half of the reaction is given as follows:
Substitute
The overall reaction by the two half-cell reactions is given as follows:
The total standard Gibbs free energy is calculated as follows:
Now, the equilibrium constant is calculated as follows:
Substitute
Therefore, the equilibrium constant for the reaction is
b) Most
According to part (a), the free
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 22 Solutions
Chemistry
- An aqueous solution of an unknown salt of vanadium is electrolyzed by a current of 2.50 amps for 1.90 hours. The electroplating is carried out with an efficiency of 95.0%, resulting in a deposit of 2.850 g of vanadium. a How many faradays are required to deposit the vanadium? b What is the charge on the vanadium ions (based on your calculations)?arrow_forwardA constant current of 1.40 amp is passed through an electrolytic cell containing a 0.100 M solution of AgNO3 and a silver anode and a platinum cathode until 2.48 g of silver is deposited. a How long does the current flow to obtain this deposit? b What mass of chromium would be deposited in a similar cell containing 0.100 M Cr3+ if the same amount of current were used?arrow_forwardA constant current of 1.25 amp is passed through an electrolytic cell containing a 0.050 M solution of CuSO4 and a copper anode and a platinum cathode until 3.00 g of copper is deposited. a How long does the current flow to obtain this deposit? b What mass of silver would be deposited in a similar cell containing 0.15 M Ag+ if the same amount of current were used?arrow_forward
- 2. What is the oxidation number of the metal in (NH4)3[Fe(CN)6]? 0 +1 +2 +3arrow_forwardThe standard reduction potential for the reaction [Co( H 2 O)6]3+(aq)+e[CO( H 2 O)6]2+(aq) is about 1.8 V. The reduction potential for the reaction [Co( NH 3 )6]3+(aq)+e[Co( NH 3 )6]2+(aq) is +0.1 V. Calculate the cell potentials to show whether the complex ions,. [Co( H 2 O)6]2+ and or [Co( NH 3 )6]2+, can be oxidized to the corresponding Cobalt (III) complex by oxygen.arrow_forwardPlatinum(II) forms many complexes, among them those with the following ligands. Give the formula and charge of each complex. (a) two ammonia molecules and one oxalate ion (C2O42-) (b) two ammonia molecules, one thiocyanate ion (SCN-), and one bromide ion (c) one ethylenediamine molecule and two nitrite ionsarrow_forward
- Use the formation constant of [Au(CN)2] in Appendix K to determine the equilibrium concentration of Au+(aq) in a solution that is 0.0071 M CN and 1.1 104 M [Au(CN)2]. Is it reasonable to conclude that 100% of the gold in solution is present as the [Au(CN)2] complex ion? Explain.arrow_forwardThe following data were collected for the reaction, H2(g) + L(g) ** - HI(g), at equilibrium at 25°C: [HJ = 0.10 mol L-1, [IJ = 0.20 mol L"\ [HI] = 4.0 mol L’1 Calculate the equilibrium constant for the reaction at this temperature.arrow_forwardThe transition metals form a class of compounds called metal carbonyls, an example of which is the tetrahedral complex Ni(CO)4. Given the following thermodynamic data (at 298 K): (a) Calculate the equilibrium constant for the formation of Ni(CO)4(g) from nickel metal and CO gas. (b) Is the reaction of Ni(s) and CO(g) product- or reactant-favored at equilibrium? (c) Is the reaction more or less product-favored at higher temperatures? How could this reaction be used in the purification of nickel metal?arrow_forward
- Copper(I) ion disproportionates to copper metal and copper(ll) ion. (See Study Question 99.) 2 Cu+(aq) Cu(s) + Cu2 + (aq) (a) What two half-reactions make up the disproportionation reaction? (b) Use values of the standard reduction potentials for the two half-reactions in part (a) to determine whether this disproportionation reaction is product-favored at equilibrium. (c) What is the equilibrium constant for this reaction? If you have a solution that initially contains 0.10 mol of Cu+ in 1.0 L of water, what are the concentrations of Cu+ and Cu2+ at equilibrium?arrow_forwardUse electrode potentials to answer the following questions, assuming standard conditions. a Do you expect permanganate ion (MnO4 ) to oxidize chloride ion to chlorine gas in acidic solution? b Will dichromate ion (Cr2O72) oxidize chloride ion to chlorine gas in acidic solution?arrow_forwardThe standard reduction potential for the reaction [Co(H2 O)6]3+(aq) + e− ⟶ [Co(H2 O)6]2+(aq) is about 1.8 V. The reduction potential for the reaction [Co(NH3)6]3+(aq) + e− ⟶ [Co(NH3)6]2+(aq) is +0.1 V. Calculate the cell potentials to show whether the complex ions, [Co(H2O)6]2+ and/or [Co(NH3)6]2+, can be oxidized to the corresponding cobalt(III) complex by oxygen.arrow_forward
- Chemistry for Engineering StudentsChemistryISBN:9781337398909Author:Lawrence S. Brown, Tom HolmePublisher:Cengage LearningGeneral Chemistry - Standalone book (MindTap Cour...ChemistryISBN:9781305580343Author:Steven D. Gammon, Ebbing, Darrell Ebbing, Steven D., Darrell; Gammon, Darrell Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon, Darrell D.; Gammon, Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon; DarrellPublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry: The Molecular ScienceChemistryISBN:9781285199047Author:John W. Moore, Conrad L. StanitskiPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Chemistry & Chemical ReactivityChemistryISBN:9781337399074Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David TreichelPublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry & Chemical ReactivityChemistryISBN:9781133949640Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David TreichelPublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry: Principles and PracticeChemistryISBN:9780534420123Author:Daniel L. Reger, Scott R. Goode, David W. Ball, Edward MercerPublisher:Cengage Learning