Multinational transfer pricing, effect of alternative transfer-pricing methods, global income tax minimization. Tech Friendly Computer, Inc., with headquarters in San Francisco, manufactures and sells a desktop computer. Tech Friendly has three divisions, each of which is located in a different country:
- a. China division—manufactures memory devices and keyboards
- b. South Korea division—assembles desktop computers using locally manufactured parts, along with memory devices and keyboards from the China division
- c. U.S. division—packages and distributes desktop computers
Each division is run as a profit center. The costs for the work done in each division for a single desktop computer are as follows:
China division: | Variable cost = 900 yuan |
Fixed cost = 1,980 yuan | |
South Korea division: | Variable cost = 350,000 won |
Fixed cost = 470,000 won | |
U.S. division: | Variable cost = $125 |
Fixed cost = $325 |
- Chinese income tax rate on the China division’s operating income: 40%
- South Korean income tax rate on the South Korea division’s operating income: 20%
- U.S. income tax rate on the U.S. division’s operating income: 30%
Each desktop computer is sold to retail outlets in the United States for $3,800. Assume that the current foreign exchange rates are as follows:
Both the China and the South Korea divisions sell part of their production under a private label. The China division sells the comparable memory/keyboard package used in each Tech Friendly desktop computer to a Chinese manufacturer for 4,500 yuan. The South Korea division sells the comparable desktop computer to a South Korean distributor for 1,340,000 won.
- A. Calculate the after-tax operating income per unit earned by each division under the following transfer-pricing methods: (a) market price, (b) 200% of full cost, and (c) 350% of variable cost. (Income taxes are not included in the computation of the cost-based transfer prices.)
- B. Which transfer-pricing method(s) will maximize the after-tax operating income per unit of Tech Friendly Computer?
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 22 Solutions
Horngren's Cost Accounting, Student Value Edition Plus MyLab Accounting with Pearson eText - Access Card Package (16th Edition)
- What difficulties do you see in using a full-cost transfer-pricing system in the future?arrow_forwardThe manager of a microchip (chip for short) manufacturing firm can choose from various production technologies and must determine whether or not to (a) move part of their production to a foreign plant, and (b) use the same technology in their foreign plant that they use in their domestic plant. Chip manufacturers can produce using either sophisticated equipment and relatively few workers (prevalent choice in the US) or many workers and less complex equipment (prevalent choice abroad). U.S. chip firms have been moving much of their production abroad for many years. Worldwide sales of chips made in the U.S. dropped from 66% in 1976 to 34% in 1998, and to 17% in 2011, then rose slightly to 21% in early 2015. U.S. chip firms moved their production abroad because of lower taxes, lower labor costs, and capital grants provided by foreign governments. These grants reduce the cost of operating a foreign facility by as much as 25%, compared to the costs of running a U.S. plant.…arrow_forwardIf the two division managers are compensated based on after-tax division operating income, which transfer-pricing method will each prefer? Which transfer-pricing method will maximize the total aftertax operating income of Express Grow?arrow_forward
- Reasons that a company might choose to acquire a business in a foreign country include all of the following except: Take advantage of free trade agreements Purchase local customer loyalty Local management understands local ing-hiet equatitionsarrow_forwardi-Qua group is a drinking water factory in US. As the business progresses, demand is increasing in Texas, Chicago and New York. And the company owner plans to build a factory so that customer needs in the area can be met without having to send from the main factory. Some of the considerations for decision making can be seen based on the data below: a. How much is the annual sales volume (box) for each area to be able to compete on a competitive advantage strategy with competitors? b. What do you suggest to the company based on the cost data above for the location of its factory construction? Explain why and use the calculation data so that decision making can be in accordance with the company strategy that you have learned.arrow_forwardConsider a Japanese firm that sells product Y in the local market and contemplates sales to the US. If the Japanese firm enters the American market it will compete in quantities against a US firm already in the market. The inverse demand for Y in the US is Pus = 250 - Q (all prices and costs in this problem are in ŞUS), where Q = qu + qj, is total quantity eventually sold by the two competitors. The production of Y requires operating a plant at a fixed cost F = 300, as well as 1 unit of labor and 1 unit of capital per unit of output. Currently, at both the US and Japan the cost of capital is $15/unit and that of labor $10/unit. The Japanese firm has the option to either invest directly in operating a plant in the US, or use at no extra fixed cost its already existing plant in Japan, shipping its product to the US. In that case a transportation cost of $10/unit has to be paid on top of any production cost; also, American customs require a $5/unit duty for any Y imports. a) Find the…arrow_forward
- 17. Companies are involved in exporting their product to different parts of the world then setting up a producing facility abroad. Explain what are the advantages and limitation of such strategy.arrow_forward"Companies with labor incentive manufacturing processes are most likely to benefit from sending manufacturing operations overseas because the bulk of potential cost savings relate to labor costs".Question: Prepare an analysis showing whether a product line or other business segment should be added or dropped.(Note: Samsung Manufacturing)arrow_forwardp4-9arrow_forward
- Which of the following is an example of managing economic exposure by flexible sourcing policy? An American company sells its products in Brazil and Portugal. Reduced sales in Brazil due to the dollar appreciation against the “real” can be compensated by increased sales in Portugal due to the dollar depreciation against the euro. If yen is strong, it is preferable for a Japanese company to open a manufacturing subsidiary in the U.S. to produce and sell its products there. An American IT company hires software developers in Ukraine because of the weak position of grivna against dollar. A Canadian company spends a lot of money for research & development activities to improve its reputation and gain more customers.arrow_forwardBSF Limited is an Indian multinational company. It ships pre-packaged snacks to Hong Kong, the United Kingdom, and the United States, where sales affiliates resell these snacks. BSF, as the parent company, engages in numerous intrafirm transactions with its affiliates. Since the outbreak of COVID-19, BSF is concerned about the funds that it has in its Hong Kong affiliate. Therefore, BSF has decided that it should re-examine its transfer pricing policy with its Hong Kong affiliate to reposition funds from Hong Kong to India. The corporation tax rate in Hong Kong is 35%, whereas it is 21% in India. At present, BSF charges Hong Kong affiliate a transfer price of $100 for a Box of Snacks. Since transfer pricing is a well-known tax avoidance method or fund repositioning, Hong Kong tax authority has been vigilant in tackling such incidences. Answer the following questions related to the transfer pricing: A. What do you recommend that BSF should do for repositioning funds from Hong Kong to…arrow_forwardSuppose Coca-Cola and Pepsi Companies have each one affiliate in Sultanate of Oman. But Coca-Cola affiliate was able to reduce the cost of its raw materials more than Pepsi affiliate which leads to the increase of its market share in the Sultanate of Oman. Which of the following exposures do 14 you think is the Omani affiliate of Pepsi Company facing? O a. Translation exposure O b. Economic exposure O C. Accounting exposure O d. Transaction exposurearrow_forward
- Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337912020Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. TaylerPublisher:South-Western College PubFinancial Reporting, Financial Statement Analysis...FinanceISBN:9781285190907Author:James M. Wahlen, Stephen P. Baginski, Mark BradshawPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...AccountingISBN:9781337115773Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. HeitgerPublisher:Cengage Learning